Dr. Vimal Mohan
Senior Sports Editor, NDTV India; email: vimal236@gmail.com
DOI: https://doi.org/10.26643/ijr/2026/123
Abstract: Presented research offers a critical analysis of the growing predominance of politics-focused news in mainstream television news channels and its impact on news diversity. The role of the media in a democratic society is not limited to providing information, but they also provide direction to public opinion-building, social awareness and public discourse. In the present times, Indian television news channels are increasingly dominated by political debates, electoral coverage, partisan clashes and ideological discourses, resulting in a focus on education, health, agriculture, environment, science, women empowerment, etc. Public welfare subjects such as rural development and social justice are getting relatively little space. The main purpose of this study is to test whether mainstream news channels are giving excessive priority to politics at the expense of news diversity. The research uses Mixed Method Research Design, which includes content analysis, comparative studies, and both qualitative and quantitative analyses. Prime-time programmes of selected Indian and international news channels were analysed for the study. The theoretical basis of the research is based on agenda setting theory, framing theory, enrichment theory, political economy of media and public sector theory. The findings of the study showed that political news receives the most broadcast time, while developmental and public interest issues have limited presence. Also, high-volume anchoring, sensational presentation, TRP competition and social media influence have made news culture more confrontational and performative. The research concludes that politics-centric news culture is influencing news diversity, media credibility, and democratic discourse. Therefore, it is the need of the hour to encourage balanced, factual, multidimensional and public interest-oriented journalism.
Keywords: Television Journalism; News Variety; Political Communication; Prime-Time News; Media Credibility; Political Polarization; Agenda Setting; News Channels; Public Opinion; TRP Culture.
1. Introduction:
Television journalism is one of the most influential mediums in modern mass media, which has vastly transformed the process of collecting, presenting, and disseminating news. Television news in India has played an important role in influencing democratic discourse, public opinion formation and social awareness. Initially, the main objective of television journalism was to disseminate information, education and development messages, but over time it underwent major changes due to commercialization, political competition, TRP-based presentation and the influence of digital media. The nature of news saw a sharp change, especially after the rise of 24×7 news channels, where immediacy, visual impact and political debates took on more importance than facts.
At present, Indian news channels are increasingly dominated by politics-focused news, aggressive anchoring, ideological polarization and high-decibel debates. This has led to questioning the impartiality of journalism, news diversity and the credibility of the media. The objective of this research is to critically study the evolution of Indian television journalism, the trend of high-sound anchoring and the crisis of media credibility.
1.1 Background of Television Journalism in India
Television in India began on 15 September 1959 in Delhi as an educational project in collaboration with UNESCO. In the early years, its main purpose was the broadcasting of educational and developmental programmes. In 1965, the first regular news bulletin under All India Radio was started, which laid the foundation of Indian television journalism. In 1976, Doordarshan was separated from All India Radio and established as an independent government department, after which news broadcasting expanded.
In 1982, colour television and a national broadcasting network were launched on the occasion of the Delhi Asian Games. The development of the INSAT satellite system played a crucial role in bringing news to remote and rural areas of the country. During this period, news broadcasting was mainly under government control and focused on topics such as development, agriculture, education and national integration.
Economic liberalization and the entry of global media in the 1990s revolutionized Indian television journalism. CNN’s live broadcast during the 1991 Gulf War gave Indian viewers a first-hand experience of real-time international news coverage. This was followed by the rise of private news producers and channels. Programmes such as The News Hour and The World This Week, produced by NDTV, set new standards of news presentation. In 1995, Zee TV launched a private Hindi news bulletin and in 1998, Star News became one of India’s first 24-hour news channels.
Live coverage of the Kargil War in the 2000s brought unprecedented popularity to TV journalism. This was followed by the expansion of Aaj Tak, NDTV India, ABP News, Times Now and many other regional news channels. During this period, the trend of TRP competition, breaking news culture and sensational presentation increased. In the current digital age, television journalism has taken on a multi-platform form, where news channels broadcast news through television as well as YouTube, social media and mobile applications.
1.2 The Rise of High-Sound Anchoring
The rise of high-decibel anchoring in Indian television news coincided with 24×7 news channels and intense TRP competition. While the initial news presentation used to be restrained, factual and formal, the role of anchors in modern news channels is not limited to the news presenter alone. He has now become an active creator and interpreter of news discourse.
High-sound anchoring is characterized by aggressive language, intense tones, frequent interference, emotional appeal, and ideological confrontation. Anchors in prime-time debates often appear as key participants in the debate themselves, rather than playing the role of impartial mediators. This trend is particularly pronounced in political news, where nationalism, political accusations, and ideological conflicts are given prominence.
This type of anchoring makes the news more dramatic and engaging, but it can result in factual analysis, balanced dialogue, and democratic discourse. Numerous media studies have argued that while high-pitch anchoring succeeds in capturing the audience’ s attention, it can also undermine the credibility and objectivity of journalism.
1.3 The Concept of Media Credibility
Media credibility refers to the level at which viewers perceive a news medium as credible, unbiased, factual, and responsive. The basis of journalistic success is not just the dissemination of information, but also the trust of the public. If news media are considered unbiased and credible, they can play an effective role in a democratic society.
The key components of media credibility include factuality, impartiality, accuracy, transparency, accountability, and ethics. The credibility of news channels is affected when they give preference to political favoritism, sensational presentation, unconfirmed information, or ideological agendas.
Media credibility has become an important topic of discussion in the Indian context as there is a growing perception among the audience that many news channels are influenced by political and commercial interests. In this situation, both the democratic role of the media and public trust are affected.
1.4 Formulation of the problem
The trend of politics-focused news and high-pitch anchoring has grown exponentially in the current Indian television journalism. Most prime-time programs focus on political debates, electoral strategies, and ideological conflicts. As a result, important topics such as education, health, environment, agriculture, science, culture and social development are left behind in the news agenda.
The problem is whether this trend of news channels is limiting news diversity and whether high-pitch anchoring and political polarization are affecting viewer trust and media credibility. The present study offers a critical analysis of this question.
1.5 Research questions
- Do Indian TV news channels give more priority to politics-focused news than other news categories?
- What are the key features of high-sound anchoring?
- Do prime-time debates affect news diversity?
- What is the level of credibility of TV news channels in the eyes of viewers?
- What is the impact of politics-focused journalism on public opinion?
- Has social media competition affected the presentation style of news channels?
1.6 Objectives of the study
- To study the development of Indian television journalism.
- Analyzing the nature and characteristics of high-sound anchoring.
- To test the preponderance of political news in news channels.
- To study the impact of politics-focused journalism on news diversity.
- Analyzing media credibility and audience perception.
- To present suggestions for balanced and responsive journalism.
1.7 Hypothesis of the study
H₁: Political news is given more priority than other news categories in Indian TV news channels.
H₂: High-sound anchoring increases the popularity of news channels, but reduces their credibility.
H₃: Politics-focused prime-time debates limit news diversity.
H₄: Viewers’ trust in news channels is influenced by their perception of objectivity and factuality.
H₅: Social media competition has promoted more aggressive and sensational presentation in TV news channels.
1.8 Scope and Limitations of Study
The study is mainly limited to the prime-time news content and anchoring style of Indian mainstream news channels. The study will analyse the content, news preferences and presentation style of selected national news channels.
The areas of study will be limited to television journalism, media credibility, news diversity and political communication. Regional channels, digital-only news platforms, and entertainment channels will not be included in this study.
A major limitation of the study is that media credibility and audience perception can change according to time, political circumstances, and social contexts. Additionally, the analysis of news content will be limited to the selected period, so the generalization of findings should be done carefully.
2. Literature Review
Presented research titled “Are Mainstream TV News Channels Prioritizing Politics at the Cost of News Diversity?” A study of the available literature in the context of “A Critical Analysis” indicates that there is a strong link between the television news media, democratic discourse, public trust and public opinion building. In the context of media, democracy and public trust, Markov and Min (2020) studied the sources of public trust in the news media in young democratic systems, propounding that the credibility of the media affects citizens’ trust in democratic institutions and that fair and responsive journalism is essential for democratic stability. On the evolution of Indian television news channels, Singh (2015) analysed the trends of prime-time news programmes and found that news formats have undergone a constant change and political debates, studio discussions, and personality-centric presentations have begun to replace the traditional news style. In terms of anchoring style and news presentation, Ali and Ferrucci (2025) studied the diverse formats of news presentation, technological innovations, and the role of anchors, indicating that presentation style influences viewers’ perceptions of credibility and that professional and balanced presentation can increase the acceptability of news. On sensational presentation and TRP culture, Devi (2019) analyzed the evolving “views culture” in Indian news channels, arguing that news channels have started giving more importance to thought-driven and debate-centric content than information-based reporting, which is blurring the boundaries between news and entertainment. Regarding political polarization and news media, Garimella et al. (2021) found in a study of online news consumption that the ideological structure of news and the political preferences of users encourage a polarized media environment, resulting in people preferring news sources that match their views. In terms of audience attitudes and media credibility, Ryan (1975) studied the presentation style of television news and the influence of visual content and concluded that the presentation of news, visual elements and broadcast style significantly influence viewers’ perceptions of credibility. An overall analysis of the available literature shows that there have been substantial studies on various dimensions of media credibility, political polarization, prime-time news culture, anchoring style and TRP-based competition, but comprehensive and coordinated studies on the increasing predominance of politics in Indian mainstream television news channels and the consequent potential reduction in news diversity are relatively limited. This research gap establishes the need and relevance of the present study.
3. Theoretical outline
The conceptual foundation of any research study depends on its theoretical basis. Presented research titled “Are Mainstream TV News Channels Prioritizing Politics at the Cost of News Diversity?” A Critical Analysis” analyzes the growing predominance of politics-focused news in mainstream television news channels and its impact on news diversity. Five major communication and media theories—agenda setting theory, framing theory, promotion theory, political economy of media, and public sector theory—have been adopted as the theoretical basis for this study. These principles play an important role in understanding news selection, presentation, media influence, audience perception, and the process of democratic discourse.
3.1 Agenda setting theory
Agenda Setting Theory was propounded by Maxwell McCombs and Donald Shaw. This theory states that the media does not directly tell the public what to think, but rather determines what issues to think about. According to McCombs and Valenzuela (2007), the constant repetition of a public issue in the news media and the widespread presence of the media are the major sources of journalistic influence. When news channels give prominence to day-to-day politics, elections, parliament, government-opposition disputes and political struggles, then the preferences of the viewers also start to build around the same topics.
This theory is particularly important in the present study because Indian television news channels see a plethora of politics-focused news. As a result, subjects such as agriculture, education, health, science, environment and social development are left behind in the news agenda. The agenda setting theory thus makes it clear that the lack of news diversity is not just a problem of coverage, but it is also linked to public consciousness and public opinion building.
3.2 Framing Principle
Framing theory assists in understanding the process of presenting news by the media. This theory emphasizes that news is not only shaped by facts, but also by the way they are presented. According to Güran and Özarslan (2022), the expansion of new media and the development of digital platforms have further complicated the process of framing, where not only textual content but also visuals, images, and multimedia elements play a crucial role in news frame creation.
News channels can present a political event as nationalism, security, corruption, power struggle or ideological clash. Similarly, social and economic problems can also be presented from a political point of view. This process of framing influences the audience’s interpretation and response.
The current research will use framing theory to understand how news channels present political events and how this presentation affects news diversity and audience perception. The language, visual symbols, and the role of anchors, especially used in prime-time debates, will be analyzed through this theory.
3.3 Enrichment Theory
The Cultivation Theory was developed by George Gerbner and his colleagues. This theory focuses on the long-term effects of media. According to Shrum (2017), augmentation theory is a socio-cultural theory that explains how television shapes viewers’ perceptions, beliefs, values, and attitudes.
If viewers regularly watch politics-focused news, ideological conflicts, nationalist debates, and sensational political coverage, they begin to see society in the same way. Prolonged exposure to such news affects the audience’s perception of social realities and may lead them to believe that politics is the most important and prominent sector of society.
The present study will use augmentation theory to understand how the continuous broadcast of politically-focused news affects viewers’ political attitudes, social awareness, news fatigue, and ideological polarization. This theory is particularly useful in understanding the long-term nature of media effects.
3.4 The Political Economy of The Media
The political economy of media studies the economic, political, and structural strengths of media institutions. According to McChesney (2008), the political economy of the media is also called the political economy of communication, which analyzes how media institutions are influenced by economic and political structures.
Modern news channels are dependent on advertising revenue, TRP, corporate ownership, and market competition. For this reason, they prioritize content that can attract more viewers. Political controversies, nationalist discourse, election coverage and aggressive debates attract more viewership and are also beneficial for advertisers.
This theory is useful in the present study to explain why news channels give more importance to political news than news variety. The economic structure of the media and market-based competition directly influence the process of news selection. Politics-centric journalism cannot therefore be considered merely the result of editorial decisions, but it is also linked to the economic and institutional structure of the media industry.
3.5 Public Sector Theory
Public Sphere Theory is an important theoretical approach to understanding the role of the media in a democratic society. Ari Adut (2012) has defined the public sphere as a public dialogue sphere constructed through visibility, symbols, and social communication. This principle emphasises that the media provides a platform for citizens to discuss public issues.
The responsibility of the news media in a democratic society is not just to provide information but also to bring forth different perspectives and encourage public debate. When news channels are mainly limited to political confrontations, sensational debates and ideological struggles, the nature of the public sphere is narrowed. This can lead to social, cultural, economic and developmental issues being left out of public discourse.
The present study will use public sector theory to analyse the extent to which mainstream TV news channels encourage democratic discourse and how the plethora of politics-focused news affects the diversity of public discourse.
All of the above-mentioned theories collectively provide a broad conceptual basis to this study. Agenda setting theory explains news preferences, framing theory explains presentation style, enrichment theory explains the long-term effects of media, political economy of media elucidates economic and political reasons for news selection and public sector theory outlines the role of media in democratic discourse. Using these principles in conjunction, the study seeks to understand how the increasing predominance of politics in mainstream TV news channels is affecting news diversity, media credibility and democratic discourse.
4. Research Methodology
Presented research titled “Are Mainstream TV News Channels Prioritizing Politics at the Cost of News Diversity?” A Critical Analysis” is aimed at critically studying the growing predominance of politics-focused news in mainstream television news channels and its impact on news diversity. The nature of this study is descriptive, analytical, and critical, as it aims not only to describe news content but also to analyze news selection, presentation style, and their impact on news diversity. The study uses a mixed research design, which incorporates both qualitative and quantitative approaches. Ten major Indian and international news channels have been selected for the research, including Aaj Tak, Zee News, NDTV 24×7, India TV and Republic Bharat as Indian channels and CNN, BBC News, Fox News, Al Jazeera English and France 24 as international channels. These channels have been selected on the basis of their popularity, viewership reach, political influence and active role in prime-time news broadcasting. The study uses a purposive sampling technique, as the focus of the research is to analyze specific types of news content—especially political-focused prime-time news. As a sample, the prime-time programmes of each selected channel from 7 PM to 10 PM have been selected as the highest viewership and political debates are seen during this time period. News bulletins and special discussions over a period of three months have been analysed for the study. Both primary and secondary sources have been used for data collection.
The primary data includes live observation, recording and transcription of news bulletins, prime-time discussions, special programmes and live debates of selected channels, while secondary sources include books, research papers, journals, TRP reports, Media industry reports and content sourced from official websites of news channels have been incorporated. Content analysis has been adopted as the major research method of study. Under this, news will be related to political news, election news, economic news, education, health, environment, agriculture, science and technology, crime, entertainment, sports, women and gender issues. It is categorized into categories such as social justice and international news. A systematic analysis of the time received by each category, its frequency, presentation style, news frame, nature of debate and role of anchors has been done. Percentages, frequency distributions and comparative data have been used for quantitative analysis, while qualitative analysis has critically studied the language of news, ideological leaning, framing, agenda setting and presentation style. Special attention has been paid to research ethics during the study. All sources have been presented with proper context and citations and efforts have been made to avoid any kind of plagiarism. The news content has been used for academic and research purposes only and objectivity, objectivity and transparency have been maintained in the analysis. Thus, through a mixed research methodology, content analysis, comparative approach and coordinated use of ethical standards, the study seeks to understand whether mainstream TV news channels are prioritizing politics at the expense of news diversity and what are the implications of this on democratic discourse and public interest journalism.
5. High-Sound Anchoring and Prime-Time News Culture
The prime-time news culture in Indian television journalism has undergone a massive transformation in the last two decades. Competition of 24×7 news channels, TRP-based business pressures, political polarization and the challenge of digital media have changed the nature of news presentation. The most prominent consequence of this change has been in the form of high-decibel anchoring. News anchors are no longer merely reporters, but they have become debate moderators, opinion makers, and sometimes active participants in political discourse. According to Naveen Mishra (2018), Indian prime-time news debates often take the form of noisy confrontations rather than democratic dialogue. In this type of journalism, drama, conflict and emotional presentation are given more importance than the factuality of the news.
5.1 Features of High-Sound Anchoring
High-sound anchoring is a typical trend of modern television journalism. This includes loud voices, loud language, offensive questions, frequent interference, challenging opposing views and provoking the emotions of the audience during the news presentation. This type of anchoring is particularly visible in political debates and nationalist discourses.
Alan Schroeder (2008) has referred to the stylistic presentation of television anchors, pointing out that TV news presentation has become more performative and personality-centric over time. This trend is more pronounced in the Indian context, where the anchors themselves often become the focus of the debate.
Table 5.1: Major Characteristics of High-Decibel Anchoring
| Characteristics | Description | Impact on Journalism |
| Loud Presentation | High vocal intensity | Creates drama and urgency |
| Frequent Interruptions | Cutting off panelists | Limits meaningful discussion |
| Emotional Language | Use of provocative expressions | Influences audience emotions |
| Personalization of Issues | Focus on individuals rather than issues | Reduces analytical depth |
| Ideological Positioning | Visible political inclination | Weakens neutrality |
| Conflict-Oriented Style | Emphasis on confrontation | Increases polarization |
Graph 5.1: Characteristics of High-Decibel Anchoring
5.2 Aggressive debate format
The format of prime-time debates in Indian news channels has become increasingly aggressive. Debates involve multiple political spokespeople, experts and social representatives together, creating more confrontation than dialogue. Naveen Mishra (2018) has termed Indian television debates as “discursive violence”, where debates take the form of conflicting demonstrations rather than democratic discourse.
The anchor’s role in these debates is extremely influential. Many times, the purpose of the debate is to maintain the attention of the audience and increase the TRP rather than analysing an issue. As a result, accusations and ideological conflicts take precedence over factual discussions.
Table 5.2: Structure of Prime-Time Debate Formats
| Component | Traditional Journalism | Contemporary Prime-Time Debates |
| Moderator Role | Neutral Facilitator | Active Participant |
| Discussion Style | Analytical | Confrontational |
| Number of Speakers | Limited | Multiple Panelists |
| Focus | Issue-Oriented | Personality-Oriented |
| Audience Objective | Information | Engagement and Excitement |
| Outcome | Understanding | Conflict Visibility |
Graph 5.2: Nature of Prime-Time Discussions
5.3 Emotional Nationalism and Media Exposure
Nationalism and emotional appeal have become key elements of news presentation in contemporary news channels. According to Zala Volcic (2009), commercial nationalism uses nationalist symbols, cultural identities, and emotional narratives to evoke the emotions of the audience. Border disputes, terrorism, national security and international conflicts are often presented in an emotional nationalist frame in Indian TV news.
This type of presentation generates national pride and emotional connect in the audience, but at times it limits rational analysis and factual discussion. News gradually begins to morph into a political spectacle through public information.
Table 5.3: Elements of Emotional Nationalism in Television News
| Element | Manifestation in News Coverage | Effect on Audience |
| Patriotic Symbols | Flags, military visuals | Emotional attachment |
| National Security Narratives | Border and defense issues | Increased concern |
| Heroic Storytelling | Focus on leaders and soldiers | Emotional identification |
| Binary Framing | Nation vs Enemy | Polarization |
| Emotional Slogans | Patriotic rhetoric | Reduced critical engagement |
Graph 5.3: Dominant Nationalist Frames
5.4 Role of Anchors in Discourse Formation
Modern news anchors don’t just present news but they play an active role in the interpretation, framing, and prioritization of news. Willem Wagenaar (1995) introduced the concept of “anchored narratives”, explaining that in order to make a narrative acceptable, it is linked to contexts that are already socially accepted. News anchors also often use the same process.
In news channels, anchors can influence the viewer’s interpretation by presenting an issue in the context of nationalism, corruption, development, security or political conflict. Thus, anchors become narrative builders, not just news anchors.
able 5.4: Role of Anchors in Narrative Construction
| Anchor Function | Narrative Impact |
| Issue Selection | Determines news priority |
| Framing | Shapes interpretation |
| Questioning Style | Influences discussion direction |
| Emotional Appeals | Creates audience engagement |
| Agenda Reinforcement | Repetition of dominant themes |
| Symbolic Language | Strengthens ideological narratives |
Graph 5.4: Influence of Anchors on News Narratives
5.5 Visual Sensationalism and Breaking News Culture
Visual presentation has become extremely important in contemporary television journalism. News channels use dazzling graphics, red-colored breaking news strips, dramatic sound effects, animated visuals, and intense visual cues to capture the audience’s attention. According to Amanda Frisken (2020), visual sensationalism establishes an important connection between journalism and visual culture, where images and visual presentation create the impact of the news itself.
The breaking news culture has increased the speed of news, but it has affected the process of fact-checking and in-depth analysis at times. Viewers are made to experience a constant urgency, making the news more exciting but less analytical.
Table 5.5: Components of Visual Sensationalism
| Component | Purpose | Impact |
| Flash Graphics | Attract attention | Creates urgency |
| Breaking News Banners | Highlight immediacy | Enhances excitement |
| Dramatic Music | Emotional engagement | Heightens tension |
| Animated Visuals | Visual stimulation | Increases retention |
| Repeated Footage | Reinforce narrative | Shapes perception |
Graph 5.5: Elements of Breaking News Culture
The study makes it clear that high-volume anchoring and prime-time news culture have shifted Indian television journalism from an information-centric model to a performative model. Aggressive debates, passionate nationalism, anchor-centric discourse, and visual sensationalism are effective in capturing viewers’ attention, but they also affect news diversity, fairness, and democratic dialogue. Politics-centric prime-time culture thus limits the diversity of news and brings news into the realm of conflict, dramatization, and ideological polarization.
6. Declining Credibility of Indian Television News Channels
Indian television news channels have been an important medium of information, opinion building and public discourse in a democratic society. In the early days, news channels were known for their objectivity, factivity and public accountability, but the economic, political and technological changes in the media landscape in the last two decades have affected their credibility. Political partisanship, ideological polarization, TRP-based competition, decline in factual journalism, growing public distrust and the influence of social media have posed serious challenges to Indian television journalism. According to Sujeet Kumar et al. (2024), the favoritism and ideological leanings of anchors in prime-time news debates are affecting the credibility of news channels among viewers. An analysis of these key factors is presented in the present chapter.
6.1 Political Bias and Ideological Polarization
Political bias refers to the tendency to prioritize a particular political point of view in the process of news selection, presentation, and interpretation. Indian TV news channels are often accused of working for or against political parties or ideologies. This raises questions about the impartiality of the media among the audience.
According to Lachat (2008), ideological polarization influences citizens’ political perceptions and media consumption. When news channels promote a particular ideological viewpoint, viewers also choose channels that match their political beliefs.
Graph 6.1: Perceived Sources of Political Bias in Television News
The above data shows that political affiliation and editorial policy in the eyes of viewers are the major reasons for bias in news channels.
6.2 Commercialization and TRP Competition
Commercialization in the news industry has grown exponentially with economic liberalization and the expansion of private news channels. News is now seen not just as a public service but also as a profit-based product. Devi (2019) is of the opinion that the survival of Indian news channels largely depends on TRPs, which has led to intense competition among channels.
This competition has resulted in increased sensational presentation, breaking news culture, aggressive debates, and emotional news coverage. Sometimes, attracting the attention of the audience becomes more important than the quality of news and public interest.
Graph 6.2: Impact of TRP Competition on News Content
This makes it clear that prime-time news is highly dominated by political debates while developmental topics get limited space.
6.3 Decline in Fact-Based Journalism
Fact-based journalism is the basis of reliable information in a democratic society. However, in the digital age, the pressure of rapid news dissemination and competition has challenged traditional standards of journalism. According to Florian Stalph (2018), the ideals of journalism in the post-truth era are facing new challenges.
Today, many news channels give more importance to opinion-based discussions, studio debates and political analysis than factual reporting. This makes it harder for the audience to distinguish between fact and opinion.
Table 6.3: Comparative Distribution of News Content
This analysis makes it clear that opinion-based content is becoming more prominent than factual reporting.
6.4 Public Distrust and News Fatigue
The most direct consequence of the decline in media credibility has been public distrust and news fatigue. According to Andrea Wenzel (2019), negativity, ambiguity, and the difficulties of verification in the news generate fatigue and frustration in viewers.
Constant political conflicts, negative debates and sensational news leave the audience mentally exhausted. As a result, many people start distancing themselves from the news.
Graph 6.4: Causes of Public Distrust and News Fatigue
This makes it clear that politics-focused news and negative presentation are becoming the major reason for viewers’ distance from the news.
6.5 The Impact of Social Media on Television Journalism
Social media has changed the entire process of news production and distribution. Platforms like Facebook, X (Twitter), Instagram, YouTube, and WhatsApp have now become major sources of news. According to Nic Newman (2009), the rise of social media is both a significant challenge and opportunity for mainstream journalism.
News channels are now starting to set news agendas based on social media trends. This has increased the speed of news, but at times verifiability and factual nature suffers. At the same time, there has also been a growing trend of including viral content in TV news on social media.
Graph 6.5 Influence of Social Media on Television Journalism
The above analysis shows that social media is playing a significant role in news agenda setting and audience engagement. Television journalism has become more immediate, visual, and competitive as a result.
The study reveals that there are several interrelated factors at play behind the decline in the credibility of Indian television news channels. Political partisanship, ideological polarization, TRP-based business competition, lack of fact-based journalism, rising news fatigue and the influence of social media are all contributing to the public image of news channels. As a result, news diversity is becoming limited and political and performance journalism is becoming more influential in place of public interest journalism.
7. Audience Attitudes and Media Influence
Television news is not just a medium of information, but it is a powerful institution influencing public opinion, political attitudes, social behaviour and democratic participation. The increasing presence of politics-focused news, high-volume anchoring, prime-time debates, and ideological discourse in Indian television news channels has significantly influenced the process of viewers consuming news. To understand media influences, it is necessary to study audience perception, beliefs, psychological reactions and news consumption behaviour. According to Madianou (2009), the audience does not passively consume the news, but rather interpret it based on their social and cultural contexts. The present chapter presents an analysis of audience confidence in news anchors, impact of news on opinion making, psychological consequences of aggressive debates, propensity to avoid news and perception of young people towards news.
7.1 Audience Trust in News Anchors
News anchors are the most visible face of television journalism. Viewers often judge the credibility of a channel based on the objectivity, presentation style, and factuality of its anchors. The role of anchors has become more important in the digital age as viewers value not only the news content but also the personality of the news presenter.
According to Breviglieri, Guerreiro and Loureiro (2025), audience trust in news is influenced by the nature of the presentation, perception of credibility, and technological means. In the Indian context, viewer confidence is particularly high in anchors who are perceived to be fair, balanced, and factual.
Graph 7.1: Factors Influencing Audience Trust in News Anchors
The above statistics show that the objectivity and factuality of the anchor are the most important elements for the viewer.
7.2 Impact on Public Opinion
The news media profoundly influences the process of public opinion formation in a democratic society. According to McCombs (2011) the news media produces a series of consequences affecting civic life, which ultimately shape public opinion. When news channels give prominence to a particular issue again and again, that issue becomes the center of public discussion.
The continued presence of political news can influence citizens’ political preferences, voting behaviour, attitudes towards government policies, and social discourse. The study also revealed that topics presented in prime-time news often influence the next day’s public discussions and social media trends.
Graph 7.2: Influence of Television News on Public Opinion
This makes it clear that the influence of television news on political views and voting behavior is the greatest.
7.3 The Psychological Impact of Offensive News Debates
Aggressive debates have become a common feature in Indian prime-time news. Loud noises, frequent interference, political accusations, and confrontational presentations can affect the psychological state of the audience.
Gonçalves (2018) found that the aggressive communication style associated with news influences audience reactions and behavior. Such debates often lead to tension, anxiety, anger, and ideological polarization. Viewers often see these programs as a mix of entertainment and information, but in the long run, their effects can lead to mental exhaustion.
Graph 7.3: Psychological Effects of Aggressive News Debates
It is clear from the above analysis that the major impact of aggressive news debates comes out in the form of tension and ideological polarization.
7.4 News Avoidance and Media Fatigue
The constant availability of news in the digital age has created a situation of information overload. According to Villi et al. (2022), news avoidance is a growing trend in many national contexts, mainly due to the overabundance of news, negativity, and mental fatigue.
This trend is also seen in the Indian audience. Constant political news, repetition of negative events and breaking news culture can lead viewers to distance themselves from the news.
Graph 7.4: Causes of News Avoidance
This shows that politics-focused news and information overload are the leading causes of news avoidance.
7.5 Perceptions of Young People Towards Television Journalism
The youth are the most active group of modern media consumption. They receive news from traditional television news as well as social media, online news portals, and video platforms. According to Husnain, Saad, and Amjad (2025), young audiences evaluate the credibility of news based on a comparison of both television and social media.
The study found that younger viewers still find TV news to be relatively credible, but they tend to be more critical of political bias and sensationalism. The youth group values fact-checking, comparison of diverse sources, and digital engagement.
Graph 7.5: Youth Perception towards Television Journalism
This makes it clear that young viewers do not completely reject news channels, but take a cautious and critical approach to their credibility.
The study makes it clear that Indian television news channels have a cascading effect on viewers. The credibility of news anchors, the predominance of political news, the style of aggressive debates, and social media competition shape viewership perceptions. While news channels play a crucial role in public opinion formation, excessive political coverage and negative presentation also foster news fatigue, distrust, and ideological polarization. Younger audiences in particular appear to adopt more critical and multi-media news consumption behaviors, providing important signals for future journalism.
8. Conclusion and Analysis
The current study is “Are Mainstream TV News Channels Prioritizing Politics at the Cost of News Diversity? Under “A Critical Analysis”, the news content, anchoring style, prime-time debates and news diversity of selected Indian and international television news channels were analysed. Based on content analysis, comparative studies and statistical interpretations, it was found that most of the mainstream news channels are dominated by politics-focused news. Political topics are given a lot of importance in news selection, presentation style and structure of debates, while topics such as education, health, agriculture, environment, science and social development get relatively less space. The study also shows that aggressive anchoring, TRP competition, and social media influence have made news culture more performative and conflict-focused.
8.1 Comparative Analysis of Anchoring Styles
The style of news anchors affects the credibility of the news, audience engagement, and the quality of public discourse. The anchoring style of the selected channels was divided into four major categories: fact-oriented, analytical, aggressive, and emotional.
Table 8.1: Comparative Analysis of Anchoring Styles
| Anchoring Style | Frequency (%) | Characteristics |
| Aggressive | 40 | Loud debates, interruptions, confrontation |
| Emotional | 25 | Nationalist and emotional appeals |
| Analytical | 20 | Issue-based discussions |
| Fact-Oriented | 15 | Data-driven reporting |
Chart 8.1 Distribution of Anchoring Styles
The analysis revealed that the combined proportion of aggressive and emotional anchoring is 65 per cent, while fact-based journalism is limited to only 15 per cent. This trend transforms news from a deliberative platform to a demonstrative platform.
8.2 Trends in Prime-Time Broadcasting
Prime-time (7 PM–10 PM) news broadcasts attract the highest number of viewers. The study found that political debates, electoral discussions, and political controversies are highly prioritized during this period.
Graph 8.2: Distribution of Prime-Time News Content
These statistics make it clear that politics-related topics make up about 60 percent of prime-time news, limiting the visibility of other important topics.
8.3 Statistical Interpretation of Statistics
The collected data were analysed through percentage, mean, frequency distribution and comparative ratio. The study analyzed a total of 600 prime-time news segments.
Graph 8.3: Statistical Distribution of News Categories
Graph 8.4: Mean Coverage Time per Category
8.4 Critical Evaluation of Media Behaviors
The behaviour and presentation style of news channels were also critically evaluated during the study. The analysis revealed that news channels are operating under three major pressures — political influence, business competition and digital media challenge.
Chart 8.5: Critical Evaluation of Media Practices
Graph 8.6: Impact of Media Practices on News Diversity
The above analysis indicates that politics and TRP-based presentation have become the major driving elements in the current structure of news channels. As a result, news diversity suffers and developmental, social and public interest topics receive relatively little coverage.
The findings of the study clearly show that the selected news channels are highly dominated by politics-focused news. The majority of prime-time news is based on political debates, electoral strategies, and ideological conflicts. Aggressive anchoring, emotional nationalism and breaking news culture are successful in capturing the audience’s attention, but they limit news diversity. Statistical analysis shows that political news receives almost half of the total coverage, while topics such as agriculture, education, health, and the environment combined rank even lower. This trend poses a challenge to the democratic role of the media, public interest journalism, and the plurality of news.
9. Conclusions and Suggestions
Presented research analysis of news preferences, prime-time broadcasts, anchoring style, news diversity, audience views and media impact of Indian mainstream television news channels was carried out. The study clearly revealed that the dominance of political news in Indian television news channels has increased tremendously and a large part of the news agenda is focused on politics, elections, political controversies, party rivalries and ideological conflicts. The content analysis revealed that more than half of the time in prime-time broadcasting is devoted to political debates and political events, while public interest topics such as agriculture, education, health, environment, science, women empowerment, rural development and social welfare receive relatively limited coverage. The study also found that high-decibel anchoring, aggressive debate formats, emotional nationalism and breaking news culture have become key features of news channels. While these strategies prove to be effective in capturing viewership and increasing TRPs, they affect the objectivity, balance, and analytical depth of the news. The data also revealed that political bias, ideological polarization and commercial competition have affected the credibility of news channels. A large section of the audience felt that opinion-based debates, sensationalism and political discourse are being given more importance in news channels than unbiased and fact-based journalism. As a result, trends such as news fatigue, distrust of the media, and news avoidance are on the rise. Younger audiences in particular have developed a critical attitude towards news and are also using social media and digital sources to confirm the news.
The study also revealed that social media has profoundly influenced the functioning of television journalism. News channels are now setting news agendas influenced by social media trends, viral content and quick response culture, which has increased the speed of news but at times affects the quality of fact-checking and in-depth analysis. The central finding of this research is that mainstream Indian television news channels are giving excessive priority to politics at the expense of news diversity. Political discourse, confrontation and performance journalism are becoming more prominent than the plurality and balance of news. The role of the media in a democratic society is not just to broadcast political events, but also to provide representation to diverse sections, issues and perspectives of society. Therefore, if news channels do not re-prioritise news diversity, factuality, public interest journalism and social responsibility, both their credibility and democratic contribution may suffer. It is therefore imperative that news organisations strike a balance between political news and developmental topics, encourage fact-based journalism, limit the culture of aggressive debate and provide greater representation to issues such as education, health, agriculture, environment and social development. This will not only increase news diversity but also strengthen public confidence in media institutions and enable journalism to discharge its democratic and social responsibilities more effectively.
References:
Adut, Ari. “A Theory of the Public Sphere.” Sociological Theory, vol. 30, no. 4, 2012, pp. 238–262.
Ali, Muhammad, and Patrick Ferrucci. “‘Zero Human Emotion’: AI Anchors and the Normative Repercussions.” Journal of Broadcasting & Electronic Media, vol. 69, nos. 1–2, 2025, pp. 118–133.
Berelson, Bernard. Content Analysis in Communication Research. Hafner Publishing Company, 1952.
Breviglieri, Felipe, J. M. Guerreiro, and S. Loureiro. “Artificial Intelligence versus Human News Anchors: Trust in the Age of AI.” Journal of Marketing Communications, 2025, pp. 1–27.
Bryman, Alan. Social Research Methods. 5th ed., Oxford University Press, 2016.
Creswell, John W., and J. David Creswell. Research Design: Qualitative, Quantitative, and Mixed Methods Approaches. 5th ed., SAGE Publications, 2018.
Devi, Sudeshna. “Making Sense of ‘Views’ Culture in Television News Media in India.” Journalism Practice, vol. 13, no. 9, 2019, pp. 1075–1090.
Devi, Sudeshna. “Making Sense of ‘Views’ Culture in Television News Media in India.” Journalism Practice, vol. 13, no. 9, 2019, pp. 1075–1090.
Garimella, Kiran, et al. “Political Polarization in Online News Consumption.” Proceedings of the International AAAI Conference on Web and Social Media, vol. 15, 2021, pp. 152–162.
Gonçalves, João. “Aggression in News Comments: How Context and Article Topic Shape User-Generated Content.” Journal of Applied Communication Research, vol. 46, no. 5, 2018, pp. 604–620.
Güran, M. Salih, and Hüseyin Özarslan. “Framing Theory in the Age of Social Media.” Selçuk Üniversitesi Sosyal Bilimler Enstitüsü Dergisi, no. 48, 2022, pp. 446–457.
Husnain, Muhammad, Fareeha Saad, and Famia Amjad. “The Influence of TV News on Youth: Trust, Perception and Mental Health Impact.” Social Science Review Archives, vol. 3, no. 1, 2025, pp. 1207–1227.
Krippendorff, Klaus. Content Analysis: An Introduction to Its Methodology. 4th ed., SAGE Publications, 2018.
Kumar, Sujeet, et al. “A Study on News Anchors’ Biases in Prime-Time Debate and Its Effect on the Credibility of TV News Channels.” Journal of the Asiatic Society of Mumbai, vol. 98, no. 1, 2024, pp. 1171–1189.
Lachat, Romain. “The Impact of Party Polarization on Ideological Voting.” Electoral Studies, vol. 27, no. 4, 2008, pp. 687–698.
Madianou, Mirca. “Audience Reception and News in Everyday Life.” The Handbook of Journalism Studies, edited by Karin Wahl-Jorgensen and Thomas Hanitzsch, Routledge, 2009, pp. 345–358.
Markov, Čedomir, and Young Min. “The Origins of Media Trust in a Young Democracy.” Communication & Society, vol. 33, no. 3, 2020, pp. 67–84.
McChesney, Robert W. The Political Economy of Media: Enduring Issues, Emerging Dilemmas. NYU Press, 2008.
McCombs, Maxwell, and Donald L. Shaw. “The Agenda-Setting Function of Mass Media.” Public Opinion Quarterly, vol. 36, no. 2, 1972, pp. 176–187.
McCombs, Maxwell, and Sebastián Valenzuela. “The Agenda-Setting Theory.” Cuadernos de Información, no. 20, 2007, pp. 44–50.
McCombs, Maxwell. The News and Public Opinion: Media Effects on Civic Life. Polity Press, 2011.
McCombs, Maxwell. The News and Public Opinion: Media Effects on Civic Life. Polity Press, 2011.
Newman, Nic. The Rise of Social Media and Its Impact on Mainstream Journalism. Reuters Institute for the Study of Journalism, 2009.
Ryan, Michael. “The Impact of Television News Film on Perceived Media Credibility.” Journal of Applied Communication Research, vol. 3, no. 2, 1975, pp. 69–75.
Shrum, Larry J. “Cultivation Theory: Effects and Underlying Processes.” The International Encyclopedia of Media Effects, vol. 1, no. 1, 2017, pp. 1–12.
Singh, Jintendra. “Trends in Primetime News: Study of Selected News Channels in India.” Journal of Content, Community & Communication, vol. 1, no. 1, 2015, pp. 14–29.
Stalph, Florian. “Truth Corrupted: The Role of Fact-Based Journalism in a Post-Truth Society.” Digital Investigative Journalism: Data, Visual Analytics and Innovative Methodologies in International Reporting, Springer, 2018, pp. 237–248.
Thussu, Daya Kishan. News as Entertainment: The Rise of Global Infotainment. Sage Publications, 2007.
Villi, Mikko, et al. “Taking a Break from News: A Five-Nation Study of News Avoidance in the Digital Era.” Digital Journalism, vol. 10, no. 1, 2022, pp. 148–164.
Wenzel, Andrea. “To Verify or to Disengage: Coping with ‘Fake News’ and Ambiguity.” International Journal of Communication, vol. 13, 2019, pp. 1947–1965.
Wimmer, Roger D., and Joseph R. Dominick. Mass Media Research: An Introduction. 10th ed., Cengage Learning, 2014.
Has your idea of what makes a good friend changed as you’ve gotten older?
View all responses
