Citation
Papparaya, & Yatanoor, C. M. (2026). India’s Evolving Role in Environmental Protection: A Study in Post-Globalization Era. International Journal of Research, 13(1), 599–607. https://doi.org/10.26643/ijr/2026/v13i1-2
Papparaya
Research Scholar
Department of Political Science
Gulbarga University, Kalaburagi, 585 106
Karnataka
Prof. Chandrakant. M. Yatanoor
Senior Professor & Chairman
Department of Political Science
Gulbarga University, Kalaburagi, 585 106
Karnataka
Abstract:
The advent of globalization, particularly following India’s economic liberalization in 1991, has presented a complex and often contradictory set of challenges and opportunities for the nation’s environmental governance. This paper examines India’s evolving role in environmental protection in this transformative period. It argues that globalization has acted as a dual-edged sword, concurrently accelerating environmental degradation through rapid industrialization and consumerism, while also providing access to green technologies, international finance, and a platform for global environmental diplomacy. The paper analyses the trajectory of India’s domestic environmental policy, highlighting the critical role of judicial activism and the strengthening of legal and institutional frameworks, such as the National Green Tribunal. It further explores India’s transition on the international stage from a cautious participant to a proactive leader, exemplified by its instrumental role in the Paris Agreement and the launch of initiatives like the International Solar Alliance (ISA). Despite these advancements, significant challenges persist, including a persistent gap between policy formulation and implementation, the contentious development-versus-environment debate, and acute vulnerability to climate change. The paper concludes that India’s future role is pivotal; its ability to successfully navigate the intricate nexus of economic growth and ecological sustainability will not only determine its own developmental trajectory but also have profound implications for global environmental security.
Keywords: Globalization, Environmental Protection, India, Sustainable Development, Climate Change, Environmental Policy, Judicial Activism, International Solar Alliance (ISA).
Introduction:
The process of globalization, characterized by the accelerated integration of economies, cultures, and societies, has fundamentally reshaped the global environmental landscape. For developing nations, this integration has been a catalyst for unprecedented economic growth, but it has often come at a significant ecological cost1. India, since its economic liberalization in 1991, stands as a prime case study of this complex dynamic. As one of the world’s fastest-growing major economies and its most populous nation, India’s developmental pathway and its approach to environmental stewardship carry immense global weight. The post-globalization era has forced India to confront a dual reality: the pressures of resource-intensive growth and pollution on one hand, and the opportunities for international collaboration and technological advancement in sustainability on the other2.
Before 1991, India’s environmentalism was largely shaped by domestic concerns, culminating in foundational legislation like the Water (Prevention and Control of Pollution) Act, 1974, the Air (Prevention and Control of Pollution) Act, 1981, and the comprehensive Environment (Protection) Act, 1986, which was enacted in the aftermath of the Bhopal gas tragedy3. However, the post-1991 economic reforms unshackled the industrial sector, attracted Foreign Direct Investment (FDI), and integrated India into global supply chains. This unleashed economic forces that placed immense strain on the country’s natural resource base and its nascent regulatory capacity.
Now, it is essential to examine India’s evolving role in environmental protection since 1991. It reveals that India’s journey has been one of adaptation and transformation, characterized by a reactive strengthening of domestic policy in response to escalating environmental crises and a gradual, yet decisive, shift towards a leadership role in global environmental diplomacy. This paper analysed the dual impacts—negative and positive—of globalization on India’s environment. It will then trace the evolution of the nation’s domestic legal and institutional frameworks, with a special focus on the crucial role of judicial activism. Subsequently, India’s engagement in international environmental forums is discussed. The persistent challenges and future prospects for sustainable development in India are also analysed.
The Dual Impact of Globalization on India’s Environment
Globalization’s effect on India’s environment is not monolithic; it has simultaneously been a source of degradation and a catalyst for positive change.
A. Negative Externalities and Accelerated Degradation
The most visible consequence of economic liberalization was the rapid pace of industrialization and urbanization. The drive to attract investment and boost manufacturing output often led to the relaxation of environmental oversight, creating “pollution havens” in certain industrial clusters4. This resulted in:
- Increased Pollution: Air and water pollution levels surged. The proliferation of thermal power plants, vehicular emissions in rapidly growing cities, and untreated industrial effluents from sectors like textiles, tanneries, and chemicals have led to a severe public health crisis. A 2020 report noted that 22 of the world’s 30 most polluted cities were in India, with Particulate Matter (PM2.5) concentrations far exceeding World Health Organization (WHO) guidelines5.
- Resource Depletion: The demands of a globalized economy have intensified pressure on India’s natural resources. Deforestation for mining, infrastructure projects, and industrial agriculture has accelerated. Water tables have plummeted due to unsustainable extraction for both agriculture and industry, leading to acute water stress in many parts of the country6.
- Consumption Patterns and Waste Management: Globalization introduced global brands and fostered a culture of consumerism. This, coupled with rapid urbanization, has led to a monumental increase in municipal solid waste, plastic waste, and electronic waste (e-waste). The infrastructure for managing this waste has failed to keep pace, resulting in overflowing landfills, polluted water bodies, and informal, hazardous recycling practices7.
B. Positive Opportunities and Catalysts for Change
Despite these severe negative impacts, globalization has also provided pathways for environmental improvement.
- Access to Green Technology and Finance: Integration with the global economy has facilitated the transfer of cleaner and more efficient technologies. India has become one of the world’s largest markets for renewable energy, driven by falling costs of solar panels and wind turbines, largely imported or produced with foreign technology. Furthermore, international financial mechanisms, such as the Green Climate Fund and FDI in sustainable projects, have provided crucial capital for India’s green transition8.
- Enhanced Global Awareness and Civil Society: Globalization has connected Indian environmental movements with international networks. This has amplified the voices of non-governmental organizations (NGOs) and civil society groups, enabling them to exert greater pressure on the government and corporations. Global norms and standards regarding environmental protection and corporate social responsibility have slowly begun to influence domestic policy and corporate behavior9.
- Pressure from International Markets: As Indian companies became more integrated into global supply chains, they faced increasing pressure from international buyers and consumers to adhere to higher environmental and labour standards. This has incentivized some export-oriented industries to adopt cleaner production processes and obtain international certifications like ISO 14001.
The Evolution of Domestic Environmental Governance
In response to the escalating environmental crises of the post-globalization era, India’s domestic governance framework underwent a significant, albeit often reactive, evolution, driven primarily by judicial intervention and subsequent legislative action.
(i) The Era of Judicial Activism
Perhaps the most significant development in Indian environmental jurisprudence has been the proactive role of the judiciary. Through Public Interest Litigations (PILs), the Supreme Court of India and various High Courts have expanded the interpretation of the Constitution to protect the environment. The court declared that the “Right to Life” under Article 21 of the Constitution includes the right to a clean and healthy environment10. This principle became the basis for numerous landmark judgments:
- In the M.C. Mehta v. Union of India series of cases, the Supreme Court issued directives on controlling pollution in the Ganga River, relocating polluting industries from Delhi, and mandating the use of Compressed Natural Gas (CNG) for public transport in the capital11.
- The judiciary established key environmental principles in Indian law, including the “precautionary principle,” the “polluter pays principle,” and the doctrine of “public trust,” which holds that the state is a trustee of natural resources for the public12.
This judicial activism filled a critical void left by executive and legislative inertia, compelling the government to act on pressing environmental issues.
(ii) Strengthening of Institutional and Legal Frameworks
Prompted by judicial orders and growing public pressure, the government strengthened its institutional architecture.
- The National Green Tribunal (NGT): A landmark development was the establishment of the National Green Tribunal in 2010. The NGT is a specialized judicial body equipped with expertise to handle environmental cases effectively and expeditiously. It has delivered several impactful judgments, including bans on old diesel vehicles, regulations on sand mining, and penalties for environmental violations, establishing itself as a powerful environmental watchdog13.
- New Policies and Regulations: The post-globalization era saw the introduction of a new suite of environmental regulations targeting specific problems. These include the E-Waste (Management) Rules, 2016; Plastic Waste Management Rules, 2016; and Solid Waste Management Rules, 2016. The National Environment Policy (2006) was formulated to mainstream environmental concerns into all development activities14.
- Environmental Impact Assessment (EIA): The EIA notification, first issued in 1994 and subsequently amended, made environmental clearance mandatory for a wide range of development projects. However, the EIA process has been a subject of intense debate, with critics arguing that recent amendments, such as the draft EIA Notification 2020, have sought to dilute environmental safeguards in favor of promoting “ease of doing business”15.
India on the Global Stage: International Environmental Diplomacy
India’s role in international environmental negotiations has transformed significantly. Initially, its stance was defensive, strongly advocating for the principle of “Common But Differentiated Responsibilities and Respective Capabilities” (CBDR-RC) to emphasize the historical responsibility of developed nations for climate change and to protect its own “right to develop”16. While this principle remains a cornerstone of its foreign policy, India’s approach has become more proactive and solution-oriented.
A. Leadership in Climate Action: The Paris Agreement
At the 2015 Paris Climate Conference (COP21), India played a crucial role as a bridge between developed and developing nations, helping to forge the final consensus. It submitted ambitious Nationally Determined Contributions (NDCs), which included:
- Reducing the emissions intensity of its GDP by 33-35% by 2030 from 2005 levels.
- Achieving about 40% of cumulative electric power installed capacity from non-fossil fuel-based energy resources by 2030.
- Creating an additional carbon sink of 2.5 to 3 billion tonnes of CO2 equivalent through additional forest and tree cover by 2030.
At COP26 in Glasgow (2021), India further enhanced these commitments, pledging to achieve net-zero emissions by 2070 and setting a target of 500 GW of non-fossil fuel energy capacity by 203017.
B. Proactive Multilateral Initiatives
Beyond its commitments, India has launched major international initiatives, positioning itself as a leader of the Global South in the green transition.
- International Solar Alliance (ISA): Co-founded by India and France in 2015, the ISA is a treaty-based intergovernmental organization that aims to mobilize technology and finance to promote the widespread deployment of solar energy. With over 120 signatory countries, the ISA is a testament to India’s vision of “one sun, one world, one grid” and its leadership in climate solutions18.
- Coalition for Disaster Resilient Infrastructure (CDRI): Launched by India at the 2019 UN Climate Action Summit, the CDRI is a multi-stakeholder global partnership that aims to promote the resilience of new and existing infrastructure systems to climate and disaster risks. This initiative addresses a critical adaptation need for developing countries19.
These initiatives signal a strategic shift in India’s role from being a mere rule- mntaker in global environmental governance to an active agenda-setter.
Challenges and Future Directions
Despite significant progress in policy formulation and international diplomacy, India faces formidable challenges in translating its ambitions into on-the-ground reality.
- The Implementation Gap: A chasm persists between India’s well-formulated environmental laws and their enforcement. State Pollution Control Boards (SPCBs) and other regulatory bodies are often underfunded, understaffed, and susceptible to political and corporate influence. This results in widespread non-compliance and continued environmental degradation20.
- Development vs. Environment Dichotomy: The tension between achieving rapid economic growth and ensuring environmental protection remains a central political challenge. The government has often been accused of prioritizing industrial and infrastructure projects by diluting environmental regulations, as seen in the controversies surrounding forest clearances and the EIA process.
- Climate Change Vulnerability: India is one of the country’s most vulnerable to the impacts of climate change, including extreme weather events, sea-level rise, and water scarcity. Adapting to these impacts will require massive investment and planning, diverting resources that are also needed for mitigation and poverty alleviation21.
- Resource Inefficiency and Circular Economy: India’s economy is still highly resource-intensive. Transitioning to a circular economy model, which emphasizes resource efficiency, recycling, and waste minimization, is crucial but remains in its nascent stages.
In the future, India’s role will be defined by its ability to address these challenges. Key priorities must include strengthening regulatory institutions, investing in enforcement capacity, mainstreaming sustainability into economic planning, and fostering public participation in environmental decision-making.
Conclusion:
The era of globalization has profoundly shaped India’s environmental trajectory, presenting it with a formidable set of problems and a unique array of opportunities. The pressures of a rapidly growing, market-integrated economy have undeniably exacerbated pollution, resource depletion, and ecological stress. However, this same period has seen the rise of a powerful and independent judiciary, the creation of a sophisticated legal framework, and the emergence of India as a credible and influential voice in global environmental diplomacy.
India’s role is inherently paradoxical: it is a major contributor to global environmental challenges, yet it is also a source of innovative, large-scale solutions, particularly in the renewable energy sector. Its leadership through platforms like the ISA and CDRI demonstrates a clear intent to shape a more sustainable global future. The ultimate test, however, lies in its domestic performance. Bridging the gap between policy and practice, resolving the conflict between short-term economic gains and long-term ecological security, and building a truly sustainable development model are the defining challenges for India in the 21st century. The success or failure of this endeavour will not only determine the well-being of its 1.4 billion citizens but will also be a critical factor in humanity’s collective effort to secure a viable planetary future.
References:
- J. A. Frankel, “The Environment and Globalization,” in Globalization: What’s New, M. M. Weinstein, Ed. New York: Columbia University Press, 2005, pp. 129-169.
- E. S. Somanathan and R. S. Kumar, “Environmental Policy in India: A Review,” in A Companion to the Indian Economy, P. Basu, Ed. Hoboken, NJ: Wiley-Blackwell, 2011, pp. 491-508.
- S. Divan and A. Rosencranz, Environmental Law and Policy in India: Cases, Materials and Statutes, 2nd ed. Oxford: Oxford University Press, 2001.
- S. Murty, B. N. Kumar, and M. Paul, “Environmental Regulation, Productive Efficiency and Abatement Cost in Indian Cement Industry,” Ecological Economics, vol. 59, no. 1, pp. 123-134, Aug. 2006.
- IQAir, World Air Quality Report 2020: Region & City PM2.5 Ranking, 2021. [Online]. Available: https://www.iqair.com/world-air-quality-report
- NITI Aayog, Composite Water Management Index, Government of India, New Delhi, Jun. 2018.
- Central Pollution Control Board (CPCB), Annual Report 2018-19 on Implementation of Solid Waste Management Rules, 2016, New Delhi: Ministry of Environment, Forest and Climate Change, 2019.
- International Energy Agency (IEA), India Energy Outlook 2021, Paris: IEA, Feb. 2021.
- A. Kothari, “Environment and Globalization: A View from India,” Development, vol. 48, no. 2, pp. 81-86, Jun. 2005.
- P. Leelakrishnan, Environmental Law in India, 4th ed. New Delhi: LexisNexis, 2016.
- M. C. Mehta v. Union of India, (1987) 1 SCC 395 (Oleum Gas Leak Case).
- L. Rajamani, “The Right to a Healthy Environment in India: The Judiciary’s Role,” Review of European, Comparative & International Environmental Law, vol. 11, no. 2, pp. 175-184, Jul. 2002.
- G. P. Wilson, “India’s National Green Tribunal: A Robust Environmental Court,” Journal of Environmental Law, vol. 27, no. 1, pp. 131-143, Mar. 2015.
- Ministry of Environment, Forest and Climate Change (MoEFCC), National Environment Policy, 2006, Government of India, New Delhi, 2006.
- K. C. S. Kartha and L. V. Kumar, “Dilution of Environmental Norms: An Analysis of the Draft EIA Notification 2020,” Economic and Political Weekly, vol. 55, no. 34, pp. 10-13, Aug. 2020.
- N. Dubash, “The Politics of Climate Change in India: Narratives of Equity and Co-benefits,” Wires Climate Change, vol. 4, no. 3, pp. 191-201, May/Jun. 2013.
- Government of India, India’s Updated First Nationally Determined Contribution Under Paris Agreement (2021-2030), submitted to UNFCCC, Aug. 2022. [Online]. Available: https://unfccc.int/NDCREG
- International Solar Alliance, About ISA, [Online]. Available: https://isolaralliance.org/about/
- Coalition for Disaster Resilient Infrastructure, About CDRI, [Online]. Available: https://www.cdri.world/about-cdri
- S. Narain, “The Challenge of Implementation in India’s Environmental Governance,” in The Oxford Handbook of the Indian Economy, C. Ghate, Ed. Oxford: Oxford University Press, 2012, pp. 603-625.
- Inter-governmental Panel on Climate Change (IPCC), “Climate Change 2022: Impacts, Adaptation and Vulnerability,” Contribution of Working Group II to the Sixth Assessment Report of the Intergovernmental Panel on Climate Change, Cambridge University Press, 2022.





