Alaric Tan Lee Kai -NavigatorCapital Academy

Daily writing prompt
Something on your “to-do list” that never gets done.

Co-Founder of Navigator Capital Academy
Awarded the Hong Kong “Outstanding Financial Strategist Award” and Singapore’s “Best Asset Manager”

Alaric Tan Lee Kai
Chief Investment Officer (CIO) of Navigator Capital Academy | Co-Founder

Alaric Tan Lee Kai has over ten years of institutional-level investment and fund management experience, with long-term deep involvement in the operations of institutional capital, trade execution, and cross-asset strategy development. His professional background spans stocks, ETFs, derivatives, and multi-market interconnected strategies. He excels at building high-probability, replicable trading systems from the perspectives of capital structure and market behavior.

His core expertise focuses on the logic of institutional trading, including:

Institutional Accumulation & Phased Price Target Structuring

Market Behavior & Volume Interpretation in Capital Battle

Risk Control for Institutional Capital in Market-Neutral and Hedging Structures

Cross-Market Arbitrage & Liquidity Management Strategies

In the fields of ETF Fund Regulation and Institutional Asset Management, Alaric has long worked alongside compliance systems to implement strategic execution, balancing return stability, drawdown control, and capital efficiency, consistently delivering investment performance that meets institutional standards.

2020–2024 | Systematic Evolution of Institutional Capital Trading Framework
During this phase, Alaric led and refined a trading framework centered around the behavior of institutional capital. Key developments include:

Upgrading from “Single-Point Trading” to “Capital Rhythm Management”

Trading Logic Focused on Transaction Structure, Capital Flow, and Stage-Specific Objectives

Risk Diversification and Efficiency Enhancement through Multi-Account and Multi-Strategy Coordination

Execution Models Adapted to Different Market Regulatory Environments (Stocks / ETFs / Derivatives)

This framework emphasizes discipline, structure, and consistency in execution, aiming to avoid emotional trading. It ensures that each operation is based on a clear capital path and exit mechanism, providing institutional investors and advanced traders with a practical methodology for long-term operation.

2026 | Forward-Looking Capital Trading and Institutional ETF Allocation
Looking ahead to 2026, Alaric Tan Lee Kai is further focusing on upgrading the institutional capital trading framework. This includes refining institutional-level trading execution structures, deepening ETF-driven asset allocation and rotation strategies, and expanding into global macro hedging and cross-market capital management. The goal is to continuously strengthen the fund’s competitive edge in complex market environments.

Core directions include:

Systematic Upgrading of Institutional Capital Accumulation, Control, and Phased Profit Realization

Institutional-Level Allocation, Hedging, and Rotation Models Centered on ETFs

Global Macro Hedging and Capital Migration Strategies under Multi-Market Linkage

Maintaining Execution Discipline and Capital Efficiency Across Different Regulator Environments

At the execution level, the focus will be on in-depth research of market microstructures and institutional behavior. By meticulously analyzing transaction structures, order book changes, and liquidity distribution, the goal is to enhance the ability to judge key price levels and capital intentions. At the same time, the team will further strengthen deep liquidity management to accommodate the control requirements for large capital flows impacting price movements.

Additionally, the team will continue to push forward the development of customized ETF portfolios and structured investment solutions, offering more stable and replicable institutional-level strategies for investors with different risk preferences and capital sizes.

“The essence of the market has always been the battle between capital. True evolution lies not in chasing concepts, but in establishing a trading system that can adapt to the rhythm of institutional capital and operate in sync with global markets.”
— Alaric Tan Lee Kai

The core of this philosophy lies in deeply integrating mature institutional trading experience with an ETF-driven institutional operational framework, creating an investment methodology centered around structure, discipline, and rhythm. Under Alaric’s leadership, Navigator Capital Academy continues to solidify its position as a forward-looking, practical investment institution.

Options Trading University Crosses 700 Active Members, Reflecting a Shift Toward Disciplined Trading Education

Daily writing prompt
What are your favorite sports to watch and play?

The market for retail trading education continues to evolve as more traders seek structured, risk-aware approaches rather than speculative shortcuts. One of the platforms gaining attention in this space is Options Trading University, an educational initiative focused on professional options trading principles.

According to an article on Reuters, Options Trading University, founded by trader and educator Ryan Hildreth, has surpassed 700 active members since its launch in 2025, signaling growing interest in disciplined, rules-based options trading education.

Photo by TabTrader.com app on Pexels.com

Growing Demand for Structured Trading Education

The rapid expansion of Options Trading University highlights a broader trend within the trading community. As markets remain volatile and increasingly complex, many individual traders are moving away from hype-driven strategies and toward education centered on risk management, consistency, and long-term sustainability.

Options Trading University was created with the idea that trading should be treated as a business rather than a gamble. The platform emphasizes preparation, structure, and repeatable processes — concepts more commonly associated with institutional trading than retail speculation.

Founder Ryan Hildreth has positioned the program as an alternative to courses that promise fast profits or rely solely on pre-recorded material. Instead, the platform focuses on helping traders understand probabilities, manage capital effectively, and remain disciplined through different market conditions.

Ryan Hildreth’s Multi-Platform Educational Ecosystem

Beyond the university itself, Hildreth has built a sizable educational presence across social media. His YouTube channel, Options With Ryan, has grown to more than 70,000 subscribers, reflecting demand for transparent explanations of professional options strategies.

On the channel, Hildreth shares market outlooks, portfolio construction insights, and breakdowns of conservative options strategies. The content is designed to show how experienced traders think and plan, rather than emphasizing short-term gains or sensational results.

Hildreth also maintains an active Instagram presence, where he publishes short-form educational content focused on mindset, risk awareness, and market structure. This multi-platform approach allows traders at different experience levels to engage with disciplined trading concepts in accessible formats.

Conservative Strategies at the Core

At the heart of Options Trading University’s curriculum is a systematic approach to options trading. The program prioritizes conservative strategies such as cash-secured puts and covered calls, typically applied to fundamentally strong and liquid stocks.

These strategies are designed to generate income while maintaining defined risk parameters. Students are taught to evaluate probability, structure positions carefully, and manage trades over time rather than reacting emotionally to market fluctuations.

Key principles emphasized within the program include:

  • Maintaining adequate cash reserves
  • Avoiding excessive leverage or overexposure
  • Defining risk before entering a trade
  • Selecting high-quality underlying assets
  • Managing positions within a structured portfolio framework

This emphasis on capital preservation reflects the platform’s broader philosophy: long-term participation in the markets requires survival first, profits second.

Live Coaching and Community-Based Learning

Unlike many online trading programs that rely entirely on static content, Options Trading University incorporates live elements into its educational model. Members have access to live coaching calls, real-time trade discussions, and interactive Q&A sessions.

This structure allows students to receive ongoing guidance as market conditions change. It also fosters a sense of accountability, as traders can discuss decisions, review outcomes, and refine their execution within a community of peers following similar rules.

The platform’s community aspect has become a central component of its growth. Members participate in portfolio management discussions, risk control workshops, and strategy refinement sessions, creating an environment that mirrors professional trading teams more than isolated retail trading.

Transparency and Performance Context

Hildreth’s teaching approach places strong emphasis on transparency and realistic expectations. While he has shared that his personal trading accounts have demonstrated multi-year average returns of approximately 40 percent annually, these figures are presented strictly for educational context.

The platform consistently stresses that past performance does not guarantee future results. Instead of marketing profit potential, the focus remains on teaching proper position sizing, risk management, and disciplined execution — skills that traders can apply regardless of market direction.

This approach aligns with increasing regulatory and ethical scrutiny in the trading education industry, where exaggerated claims have often overshadowed responsible instruction.

A Global and Expanding Community

Since its launch, Options Trading University has grown into an international community of traders seeking a more professional approach to the markets. Members engage in ongoing education designed to help them remain consistent through bull, bear, and sideways markets.

The platform’s growth suggests that a segment of retail traders is actively seeking alternatives to speculative trading culture. Rather than chasing short-term excitement, these traders appear interested in building sustainable systems grounded in probability and discipline.

Looking Ahead

As Options Trading University continues to expand, its stated focus remains on controlled growth and educational quality. The company plans to refine its systems, enhance student outcomes, and strengthen its position within the options trading education landscape.

Rather than pursuing rapid scale at the expense of integrity, the platform emphasizes maintaining a disciplined ecosystem built around professionalism and long-term thinking. This strategy may prove increasingly relevant as traders navigate uncertain markets and seek education that prioritizes resilience over hype.

Bank vs. Broker: Rethinking Investment Pathways in the Modern Financial Landscape

In today’s investment world, the choice between using a bank or an independent broker has become more than a matter of convenience — it’s a strategic decision that can significantly affect your portfolio’s growth and resilience. With the increasing accessibility of online trading platforms, investors must weigh the pros and cons of traditional banking services against the innovative, often more agile solutions offered by brokers.

The article on Quanloop discusses this shift in detail, explaining how both options serve different investor needs and highlighting the structural and practical trade-offs involved.

Photo by Anna Nekrashevich on Pexels.com

Why Banks Still Dominate for First-Time Investors

Banks continue to hold a strong position in the investment space, especially among those taking their first steps into the financial markets. There’s a sense of security that comes with entrusting your finances to an institution you’ve likely used for years — whether for savings, mortgages, or day-to-day banking. Banks offer bundled services, which can simplify financial planning: one provider, one platform, and often, one advisor for everything from tax filings to retirement planning.

Additionally, regulatory safeguards in the European Union, such as investor compensation schemes up to €20,000, offer a baseline of protection when investing through a bank. The onboarding process is often streamlined, given that the customer already has a verified relationship with the institution. For those who value convenience and professional assistance, especially when managing multiple aspects of personal finance, banks remain a logical and trusted choice.

Independent Brokers: Agility, Cost-Effectiveness, and Control

However, banks are no longer the only — or even the most efficient — option available. Independent brokers have carved out a space by offering low-cost, high-control environments tailored for active and digitally savvy investors. These platforms are built for execution speed, low fees, and access to global markets.

One major distinction is pricing. While banks may charge annual management fees and transactional costs, brokers often operate on a commission-free or per-transaction model. This pricing structure appeals particularly to investors looking to maximize returns without eroding gains through overhead costs. Many brokers also offer fractional shares, enabling investors to start small and scale gradually.

Beyond cost, brokers appeal to those seeking autonomy. With advanced analytics tools, intuitive user interfaces, and 24/7 access to portfolios, modern platforms empower users to research, buy, and sell without intermediary intervention. For those with the confidence to self-direct their investment strategies, this freedom is invaluable.

Understanding the Risk Profile

It’s important to note that while the platforms differ, the inherent risks of investing — such as market volatility, political instability, or economic downturns — remain constant. Independent brokers are regulated and often provide similar levels of investor protection as banks, especially within the EU or U.S. jurisdictions. The core distinction lies in who manages the risk: banks offer guided strategies, while brokers assume that the investor will take an active role.

That said, self-management isn’t without challenges. Without advisory services, retail investors may find it harder to make informed decisions or avoid common psychological traps like panic-selling. For this reason, brokers are often a better fit for those who already possess basic financial literacy or are committed to learning.

Conclusion: A Matter of Strategy and Preference

Ultimately, choosing between a bank and a broker depends on the investor’s experience, financial goals, and appetite for autonomy. Those looking for a hands-off, integrated approach may find value in their bank’s ecosystem. In contrast, investors who seek flexibility, lower fees, and more control over their portfolios are increasingly gravitating toward independent brokers.

As financial services evolve, so too should investment strategies. Understanding the distinct roles that banks and brokers play is the first step toward making a choice that aligns with long-term financial success.