Effect of Entrepreneurship Education and Attitude on Entrepreneurial Intention Among Graduating Students of Polytechnics in Kano State, Nigeria

Daily writing prompt
Can you share a positive example of where you’ve felt loved?

How to Cite

Saleh, S. S., Abdu, R., & Suleiman, M. M. (2026). Effect of Entrepreneurship Education and Attitude on Entrepreneurial Intention Among Graduating Students of Polytechnics in Kano State, Nigeria. International Journal of Research, 13(1), 133–146. https://doi.org/10.26643/eduindex/ijr/2026/8

1Safiyanu Sulaiman Saleh, 2Rabiu Abdu, & 3Muhammad Muhammad Suleiman

1Department of Business Administration and Management,

1School Social & Management Sciences

2Bursary Department

3Department of Computer Science, School of Science & Technology

1,2,3Federal Polytechnic Kabo, Kano, Nigeria

ABSTRACT

This study explores the effects of Entrepreneurship Education (EE) and Entrepreneurial Attitude (EA) on Entrepreneurial Intention (EI) among Polytechnic’s in Kano State. Against the backdrop of Nigeria’s persistent youth unemployment and underemployment, the study seeks to determine whether exposure to entrepreneurship education and the development of a positive entrepreneurial mindset could influence students’ willingness to pursue self-employment. A thorough literature review and empirical evaluation established that entrepreneurship plays a vital role in economic transformation, especially in developing nations. Numerous studies reported a positive and significant link between EE, EA, and EI, some argue that the impact of EE is context-dependent and may be weakened by poor delivery or lack of practical engagement. The empirical literatures confirmed that EE tends to stimulate EI when it promotes self-efficacy, risk-taking, and innovation, and when coupled with a supportive entrepreneurial attitude. However, gaps remain in understanding these relationships in local contexts like Nigerian polytechnics. The study will adopt a quantitative research design and rely on data of the students obtained from the MIS Unit of Kano State Polytechnic, which recorded an HND graduating student population of 1,045 across 32 departments/programmes in various units/schools of the polytechnic Asample size of 285 will be selected using theKrejcie and Morgan (1970). Astratified random sampling technique will ensure that all departments are proportionately represented. Data analysis will be conducted using SPSS version 26, applying descriptive statistics, Pearson’s correlation, and multiple regression analysis. The results is expected to reveal a statistically significant and positive relationship between EE and EI, as well as between EA and EI.

Keywords: Entrepreneurship, Attitude, Intention, Education, Polytechnics

  1.  INTRODUCTION

Entrepreneurship plays a vital role in fostering economic transformation, inclusive growth, and national development across the globe (Johnson, Adeoye, & Chen, 2023; Ferreira, Silva, & Martins, 2022; Okafor, Ezenwa, & Oyetunji, 2021). This is especially true for developing countries like Nigeria, where challenges such as poverty and high unemployment remain critical (Emeka, Agho, & Udeh, 2023; Asuquo, 2024; Idowu, 2023; Aina & Oladipo, 2021). Despite its abundance of human and material resources, Nigeria has struggled to achieve widespread economic prosperity. Most citizens still live below the poverty line, surviving on less than a dollar per day even after over sixty years of independence (Yakubu, Hassan & Omeje, 2022), while unemployment figures continue to rise (Bello, Danjuma, & Suleiman, 2023). A country with a vibrant entrepreneurial base has the potential to become economically stable and prosperous (Nasir, Lukman, Adisa, & Olaniyan, 2023). For young people, unemployment remains a particularly severe issue often double or triple the national average (Popescu & Dinu, 2023).

Entrepreneurship is not accidental – it is an intentional decision shaped by personal, educational, and environmental factors. Numerous studies have shown that entrepreneurial intention (EI) is influenced by aspects such as education, social and family background, and exposure to entrepreneurial education (EE) (Okon & Bello, 2022). This disconnect has fueled academic interest in entrepreneurship as a practical and desirable career path for students. As a result, many studies have examined EI and its antecedents to understand entrepreneurial behavior more deeply (Silva, Pereira, & Oliveira, 2022). Research has shown that African youth are particularly entrepreneurial, demonstrating a readiness to innovate and take risks (Adeniyi, Rashid, & Gamede, 2024). Entrepreneurial intention remains a key indicator for understanding how and why individuals initiate and develop new business ventures (Patel, Sharma, & Bhatnagar, 2021).In line with this, Petrova, Kuznetsova, & Romanova (2023) emphasized the importance of exploring more psychological and environmental variables that influence EI.

Similarly, Nor, Idris, Fatah & Salim (2022) recommended larger sample sizes and broader institutional representation in EI research. Okeke, Nwankwo & Ubah (2023), who examined EI in Muslim-majority regions, advised future research to expand its geographic and cultural scope while also including new influencing variables. Likewise, Khan, Yusuf, Ali, Sharma & Adeel (2021) noted that limited empirical work has been done in developing countries to fully understand the link between EE and EI. Despite the growing significance of EI in policy and practice, few empirical studies have focused on this topic within the Nigerian context. It is against this backdrop, the present study aims to address several of these issues. Specifically, it will investigate the effects of entrepreneurial education and students’ attitudes on entrepreneurial intention among graduating students in Kano State polytechnic.

1.1 PROBLEMS STATEMENT

Despite Nigeria’s abundant human and material resources, the country continues to experience high levels of youth unemployment and poverty. Polytechnic graduates, in particular, face significant challenges in securing employment within their field of study. This disconnect between formal education and economic opportunities has sparked growing concern about the effectiveness of Nigeria’s higher education system in fostering entrepreneurship. While entrepreneurship education (EE) is increasingly recognized as a catalyst for equipping students with the mindset and skills necessary for self-employment, many Nigerian polytechnic still predominantly train students to become employees rather than entrepreneurs. Furthermore, although entrepreneurial intention (EI) is widely acknowledged as a precursor to actual entrepreneurial behavior, empirical studies examining the specific influence of EE and student attitudes on EI remain limited within the Nigerian context. The absence of localized evidence restricts policymakers, educators, and curriculum developers from making informed decisions to bridge the education-employment gap.

This study is crucial because it seeks to address the urgent challenge of youth unemployment in Nigeria by examining the role of entrepreneurial education and student attitudes in shaping entrepreneurial intentions. Previous research conducted in developed countries has demonstrated a positive relationship between EE and EI; however, such findings cannot be directly applied to Nigeria without context-specific investigation. Additionally, scholars have called for expanded research into the psychological and educational factors influencing EI, especially in developing countries. This study not only responds to that call but also contributes to filling a significant empirical gap by focusing on Kano State Polytechnic students at a critical transition point graduation. By identifying the variables that significantly impact EI, the findings of this study will inform educational policies, polytechnic curricula, and entrepreneurial development programs aimed at transforming graduates from job seekers to job creators. Ultimately, the study supports the national goal of promoting economic self-reliance and sustainable development through youth entrepreneurship.

1.2 Objectives of the Study

The primary objective of this study is to examine the effect of entrepreneurship education and students’ attitudes on entrepreneurial intention among HND graduating students of Kano State polytechnic. To achieve this main goal, the study seeks to:

  1. Assess the impact of entrepreneurship education (EE) on the entrepreneurial intention (EI) of HND graduating students of Kano State Polytechnic.
  2. Examine the influence of students’ attitudes towards entrepreneurship on their intention to become entrepreneurs.
  3. Determine the combined effect of entrepreneurship education and attitude on entrepreneurial intention among Kano State Polytechnic HND graduates.

1.3 Hypotheses Development

Based on the above objectives, the study postulated the hypotheses: –

HO1:    There is no significant positive relationship between entrepreneurship education and entrepreneurial intention of HND graduating students of Kano State Polytechnic

HO2:    There is no significant positive relationship between students’ attitude and entrepreneurial intention of HND graduating students of Kano State Polytechnic

HO3:    There is no significant positive relationship between combination of EE & EA and EI of HND graduating students of Kano State Polytechnic  

  • LITERATURE REVIEW/CONCEPTUAL DEFINITIONS

2.1 Entrepreneurial Intention

Entrepreneurial intention (EI) has emerged as a central concept in entrepreneurship research and is widely recognized as a strong predictor of planned, purposeful entrepreneurial behavior (Salim, Farouk & Nor, 2021; Adegbite, Yusuf & Lawani, 2023; Chukwuma, Bello & Hassan, 2022). EI reflects an individual’s conscious decision and commitment to start a new business or engage in entrepreneurial activities in the future. It signifies a deliberate mindset that precedes action, driven by the identification of opportunities and the perceived feasibility of launching a venture (Rahman, Tan & Othman, 2022). Furthermore, EI is often influenced by one’s ability to analyze the environment, assess market gaps, and creatively propose solutions through business ideas. This self-awareness and contextual understanding are what enable individuals, particularly students, to discover and refine entrepreneurial opportunities (Oyelola, Bakare & Adebayo, 2021). Supporting this, Martins, Lima, & Correia (2022) argue that EI represents a goal-oriented mindset, allowing individuals to align their personal and professional aspirations with the dynamic demands of entrepreneurship.

In summary, entrepreneurial intention is a multidimensional concept encompassing the desire, determination, and strategic planning to engage in entrepreneurial activities. It represents a foundational construct for understanding entrepreneurial behavior and is a critical area of interest for scholars, educators, and policymakers seeking to enhance entrepreneurship development, particularly among youth and polytechnic students.

2.2 Entrepreneurship Education and Entrepreneurial Intention

In recent years, there has been a noticeable increase in the institutionalization of entrepreneurship education (EE) within higher education curricula across disciplines. It is now common for students in fields such as the arts, engineering, and sciences to be exposed to formal entrepreneurship training at the Polytechnics level (Chinelo, Abbas & Wang, 2022). This shift reflects a growing consensus on the value of EE in broadening students’ skillsets, encouraging self-reliance, and equipping them with practical knowledge to navigate the uncertainties of post-graduation life (Ibrahim, Musa & Zhang, 2023). Numerous studies have confirmed that EE has a significant and positive impact on entrepreneurial intention (EI), which refers to an individual’s conscious decision to pursue entrepreneurship as a career path (Ayoade, Kwame, & Zhou, 2021). As such, many governments and educational institutions have integrated entrepreneurship into academic policy, not only to combat youth unemployment but also to stimulate innovation, productivity, and inclusive economic growth (Olowolaju, Shah, & Ridwan, 2023). EE serves as a strategic tool to ignite students’ interest in start-ups, wealth creation, and self-employment (Chen, Adebayo & Tan, 2021).

The integration of EE into polytechnic programs is intended to instill fundamental entrepreneurial competencies that guide students toward business ownership and sustainability. As noted by Abdulaziz, Fatai, Munirat, Ifeoma, & Raymond (2023), EE empowers students to acquire essential entrepreneurial knowledge—planning, decision-making, opportunity recognition, risk-taking which supports business creation and strategic management. Beyond technical knowledge, EE fosters creativity, responsibility, and an entrepreneurial mindset, transforming passive learners into active problem-solvers and future business leaders (Nwachukwu, Gomez & Xu, 2022). Empirical research continues to demonstrate a strong theoretical and practical link between EE and EI. Multiple studies have shown that students exposed to structured EE programs exhibit higher entrepreneurial intentions compared to their counterparts without such exposure (Okonjo, Felix, & Wang, 2024; Rahim, Ishola, & Le, 2023). Similarly, researchers such as Fatima, Bello, and Wahab (2022), and Noor, Idris, & Hassan (2021), have found that EE plays a crucial role in shaping students’ attitudes, confidence, and motivation toward entrepreneurship.

 

2.3 Entrepreneurial Attitude and Entrepreneurial Intention

Entrepreneurial education (EE) plays a significant role in shaping students’ entrepreneurial attitudes (EA), especially among those enrolled in business-related and economics programs (Okeke, Yusuf & Bello, 2021). Entrepreneurial attitude refers to an individual’s evaluative disposition – either positive or negative towards entrepreneurship, and it includes cognitive, emotional, and behavioral tendencies (Abdullahi, Musa & Li, 2022). When students develop favorable entrepreneurial attitudes, they are more likely to express interest in entrepreneurial ventures. In this context, attitude serves as a psychological framework that shapes how individuals perceive entrepreneurship and whether they are inclined to engage in it (Ogunyemi, Raji & Zhang, 2022). Attitude influences behavior, as it is linked to how one processes and reacts to information, events, or opportunities. This notion is echoed by Bello, Chukwudi, & Wang (2021), who suggest that entrepreneurial behavior is rooted in how an individual cognitively and emotionally responds to business opportunities and risks.

Scholars have emphasized that entrepreneurial action is an outcome of both attitude and intention. In essence, before entrepreneurship becomes an action, it begins as a mindset shaped by positive perceptions and internal motivation (Saidu, Ibrahim, & Chen, 2023). Therefore, cultivating positive attitudes is crucial in promoting entrepreneurial aspirations among students. Entrepreneurial attitude reflects how welcoming, enthusiastic, or critical students are toward the idea of starting a business. Pulido, Azubuike, & Zhou, (2024) define EA as a predisposition toward entrepreneurship based on self-perceptions of achievement, creativity, personal autonomy, and self-esteem. However, some scholars argue that the relationship is not always linear. For example, Ogundele, Taiwo, & Chen (2021) found that while EE improves EA, other factors such as perceived behavioral control and external support systems are also crucial in translating attitudes into intention. In a broader study, Liang, Adesina, & Wang (2024) noted that even when students have positive attitudes toward entrepreneurship, structural barriers such as lack of funding, mentorship, or market access can reduce their likelihood of acting on those intentions.

2.4 Review of Related Empirical Literature

The relationship between entrepreneurial attitude (EA) andentrepreneurial intention (EI) has attracted significant scholarly attention over the years, particularly due to its centrality in understanding entrepreneurial behavior. Empirical studies across different contexts and time periods consistently show that EA is a strong predictor of EI, though the strength and direction of this relationship may vary depending on cultural, educational, and institutional variables. A seminal work by Krueger, Reilly, & Carsrud (2000) using the Theory of Planned Behavior (TPB) laid the groundwork for understanding intention as a function of attitude, perceived behavioral control, and subjective norms. Their study confirmed that individuals with a positive disposition toward entrepreneurship are more likely to form intentions to start a business. Building on this, Liñán & Chen (2009) conducted a cross-cultural study and found that students with favorable attitudes toward entrepreneurship had higher EI scores across multiple countries, confirming the universality of the attitude-intention relationship. Similarly, Fayolle & Gailly (2015) examined European students and discovered that positive attitudes toward innovation, self-efficacy, and achievement were strongly correlated with entrepreneurial career aspirations.

Recent empirical studies between 2021 and 2024 continue to affirm these earlier findings while offering updated insights. For example, Adeoye, Ladan, & Jiang (2023) investigated Nigerian undergraduates and revealed that entrepreneurial attitude defined by indicators such as personal control, risk tolerance, and creativity significantly predicted students’ entrepreneurial intentions. The study emphasized that EA was not only influenced by personality traits but also shaped by exposure to entrepreneurship education. Okon, Bello, & Wang (2022) examined students in both Nigerian and Chinese polytechnics, and their comparative study revealed that entrepreneurial attitude mediated the impact of entrepreneurial education on EI. Their findings suggest that positive cognitive and emotional evaluations of entrepreneurship, developed through polytechnic curricula and role models, enhance students’ willingness to engage in start-up ventures. In Malaysia, Nasir, Okechukwu, & Fu (2021) conducted a structural equation modeling analysis among business students and found a direct, significant relationship between EA and EI. The study also found that entrepreneurial attitude was strengthened by factors such as internship experiences, student enterprise programs, and perceived entrepreneurial climate on campus. Additionally, Pulido, Azubuike, & Zhou (2024) carried out a longitudinal study in Nigeria that tracked students from their second year through graduation. The study showed that those who participated in project-based entrepreneurship modules developed stronger entrepreneurial attitudes and were three times more likely to express the intention to start their own businesses.

Other studies, such as those by Adamu, Olatunji, & Ye (2023), observed that EA plays a moderating role between entrepreneurship education and EI. While most students showed high levels of enthusiasm for entrepreneurship, the absence of practical application and institutional support led to a gap between intention and action. Similarly, Ogundele, Taiwo, & Chen (2021) reported that although positive entrepreneurial attitudes were prevalent among Nigerian polytechnic students, other factors such as fear of failure, lack of capital, and insufficient mentoring significantly weakened the effect on actual intention. A broader international perspective was presented by Liang, Adesina, & Wang (2024), who explored gender differences in EA and EI across three countries. Their findings indicated that while male students generally displayed higher entrepreneurial attitudes, female students’ EI was significantly influenced by social encouragement and community-based entrepreneurial programs.

Earlier works have also echoed these findings. For instance, Kusmintarti, Thoyib, Ashar, & Maskie (2014) identified that students with strong EA measured by achievement motivation and innovativeness were more inclined to start businesses. Pulka, Aminu, & Rikwentishe (2015) found similar results in a Nigerian context, where EA mediated the relationship between entrepreneurial education and EI. Studies such as Ismail (2015) andRuswanti (2015) emphasized the psychological dimensions of EA, arguing that how individuals emotionally and cognitively relate to entrepreneurship plays a major role in intention formation. Abun, Foronda, & Agoot (2018) found in the Philippines that EA significantly predicted the entrepreneurial intentions of polytechnic students, especially when paired with practical business experiences. Moreover, studies like those by Hassan, Norashikin, & Omar (2016) and Trang & Mintardjo (2018) also confirmed that EA not only predicts EI but can also be enhanced through entrepreneurship education, mentorship, and experiential learning opportunities.

The empirical literature spanning more than two decades strongly supports the assertion that entrepreneurial attitude is a key antecedent of entrepreneurial intention. While the strength of this relationship is generally positive and significant, the impact of attitude on intention can be enhanced or diminished depending on a range of contextual and moderating factors, including exposure to entrepreneurship education, access to resources, institutional support, and socio-cultural influences.

2.5 Research Model

Entrepreneurship Education (EE) 
Entrepreneurial Intention (EI)
Entrepreneurial Attitude (EA) 

Fig 1: Author’s Model, 2025

The research model investigates the influence of Entrepreneurship Education (EE) and Entrepreneurial Attitude (EA) on Entrepreneurial Intention (EI) among HND graduating polytechnic students in Kano State Polytechnic. It proposes that EE directly enhances students’ intentions to become entrepreneurs by equipping them with relevant knowledge, skills, and experiences. At the same time, EE is believed to shape students’ attitudes toward entrepreneurship, such as their confidence, motivation, and risk tolerance, which in turn influence their intention to start a business. Overall, the model is used to explore how exposure to entrepreneurship education and the development of a positive entrepreneurial mindset together drive students’ willingness to engage in entrepreneurial activities after graduation.

  • METHODOLOGY

This study will adopt a quantitative research design, aimed at assessing the effects of entrepreneurship educationandentrepreneurial attitudeonentrepreneurial intention among HND graduating students of Kano State Polytechnic. The design is non-experimental and analytical, utilizing structured data to evaluate relationships among variables. The target population will comprise all HND graduating students of 2025 from32 departments/programmes, with a total of 1,045 students as documented by the institution’s Management Information System (MIS) Unit. To determine the appropriate sample size, the Krejcie and Morgan (1970) table will be used, yielding a representative sample of 285 respondents. A stratified random sampling technique will be employed, with each department to be treated as a stratum.

4.0 RESULTS

4.1 Reliability

Education

Reliability Statistics
Cronbach’s AlphaNo. of Items
.8358

Attitude

Reliability Statistics
Cronbach’s AlphaNo. of Items
.8078

Intention

Reliability Statistics
Cronbach’s AlphaNo. of Items
.7908

The interpretation of reliability using Cronbach’s Alpha was based on the rule of thumb provided by (Sekaran & Bougie, 2010), who suggest that the Cronbach Alpha should be at least .70 or more. From the above analysis, the composite reliability coefficients of the latent constructs ranged from .790 to .835, with each exceeding the minimum acceptable level of .70, suggesting adequate internal consistency reliability of the measures used in this study (Hair, Ringle, & Sarstedt, 2011).

4.2 Regression

  Model Summaryb 
ModelRR SquareAdjusted R SquareStd. Error of the EstimateChange Statistics 
R Square ChangeF Changedf1df2Sig. F Change 
1.580a.336.3314.01613.33668.7752272.000 
a. Predictors: (Constant), ATTITUDE, EDUCATION 
b. Dependent Variable: INTENTION   
ANOVAa 
ModelSum of SquaresdfMean SquareFSig. 
1Regression2218.58421109.29268.775.000b 
Residual4387.17627216.129   
Total6605.760274    
a. Dependent Variable: INTENTION 
b. Predictors: (Constant), ATTITUDE, EDUCATION 

  Coefficientsa
ModelUnstandardized CoefficientsStandardized CoefficientsTSig.Collinearity Statistics
BStd. ErrorBetaToleranceVIF
1(Constant)12.7611.540 8.286.000  
Education.139.060.1532.306.022.5551.803
Attitude.448.064.4667.025.000.5551.803
a. Dependent Variable: INTENTION

The results suggest that both Entrepreneurial Education and Entrepreneurial Attitude significantly predict Entrepreneurial Intention among graduating students of Kano State Polytechnic. The regression model confirms that both variables (EE & EA) individually and jointly contribute significantly to predicting EI. These findings support prior studies and reinforced the importance of integrating entrepreneurship education across all departments to foster self-employment mindsets in students.

      4.3 Correlations
 EDUCATIONATTITUDEINTENTION
EDUCATIONPearson Correlation1  
Sig. (2-tailed)   
N275  
ATTITUDEPearson Correlation.667**1 
Sig. (2-tailed).000  
N275275 
INTENTIONPearson Correlation.464**.568**1
Sig. (2-tailed).000.000 
N275275275
**Correlation is significant at the 0.01 level (2-tailed).

The results suggest that both Entrepreneurial Education and Entrepreneurial Attitude significantly predict Entrepreneurial Intention among graduating students of Kano State Polytechnic. The positive correlations indicate that higher exposure to entrepreneurship education and a favorable attitude toward entrepreneurship are associated with stronger intentions to engage in entrepreneurial ventures.

  • CONCLUSION

In conclusion, entrepreneurship education plays a pivotal role in shaping students’ entrepreneurial mindset, skills, and intentions. While there is strong evidence supporting its positive influence on EI, the effectiveness of EE is highly dependent on content quality, pedagogical approach, and contextual relevance. Thus, there is a continuing need to strengthen EE curricula in polytechnics, tailor them to local entrepreneurial ecosystems, and embed experiential learning elements to foster genuine entrepreneurial intentions among students. This growing body of evidence has prompted scholars and educators to view EE as a foundation for building entrepreneurial ecosystems within academic institutions. Entrepreneurial attitude is a critical psychological construct that significantly influences entrepreneurial intention. Fostering positive entrepreneurial attitudes through education, experiential learning, and supportive ecosystems is essential to nurturing a generation of proactive, innovation-driven graduates.

  • RECOMMENDATIONS

Based on the findings above, the following recommendations were developed –

  1. Curriculum redesign – this is to ensure transition from more of theoretical lectures to practical based learning such as business simulations, business incubation, and venture creations after practical, where students earn credit for launching actual startups
  2. Attitude shaping – since attitude is a major predictor, teachers should focus on social persuasion to shape the students’ psychological attitude
  3. Dream building – invite young successful alumni entrepreneurs to speak to students. This will boost their ambition and reduce fear of failure and makes them feel that it is a feasible career
  4. Encourage arts, science and engineering students to take entrepreneurship modules together. Innovation often happens at the intersection of diverse skill sets
  5. Policy makers to encourage startup development by giving grants instead of loans.
  6. Government to intensify “ease of doing business” to facilitate development of business ideas to reality
  7. Future researches to focus more in ways of translating academic research into practice.                 

REFERENCES

Abdulaziz, A., Fatai, A., Munirat, M., Ifeoma, E., & Raymond, D. (2023). Empowering youth through entrepreneurship education in Nigerian polytechnics. International Journal of Entrepreneurial Development, 28(3), 115–130.

Abdullahi, B., Musa, S., & Li, Q. (2022). Entrepreneurial attitude as a determinant of  entrepreneurial intention among undergraduates. Journal of Entrepreneurship Studies, 34(2), 88–101.

Abun, D., Foronda, D., Agoot, F., Belandres, M., & Magallanez, J. (2018). Attitude and intention towards entrepreneurship among higher education students in the Philippines. Journal of Entrepreneurship Education, 21(2), 1–14.

Adamu, R., Olatunji, K., & Ye, Y. (2023). Bridging the gap between entrepreneurial attitude and intention through experiential learning. African Journal of Business and Management, 29(4), 242–259.

Adegbite, S. A., Yusuf, A. J., & Lawani, A. O. (2023). Attitude and entrepreneurial intent: Mediating role of entrepreneurship education and pedagogies. Covenant Journal of Entrepreneurship, 7(2), 1-14.

Adeniyi, A. O., Rashid, L. A., & Gamede, V. (2024). Individual entrepreneurial orientation for entrepreneurial readiness: A study of vocational students in Nigeria. Humanities and Social Sciences Communications, 11(1), 1-10. https://doi.org/10.1057/s41599-024-02728-9

Adeoye, T., Ladan, A., & Jiang, Z. (2023). Influence of entrepreneurial attitude on the formation of entrepreneurial intention among Nigerian students. International Journal of Management and Entrepreneurship, 17(1), 33–50.

Aina, A., & Oladipo, R. (2021). Challenges of youth entrepreneurship in Nigeria. Journal of Sustainable Development, 10(2), 87–101.

Asuquo, R. E. (2024). Entrepreneurship education as a response to graduate unemployment in

Nigeria. Journal of African Education and Innovation, 6(1), 100–115.

Ayoade, A., Kwame, E., & Zhou, L. (2021). Impact of entrepreneurship education on entrepreneurial career choice. Education and Entrepreneurship Quarterly, 5(3), 44–61.

Bello, J., Chukwudi, A., & Wang, H. (2021). Cognitive and emotional dimensions of entrepreneurial behavior among undergraduates. Entrepreneurship and Society Review, 9(2), 44–62.

Bello, K. S., Danjuma, I., & Suleiman, A. (2023). Effect of entrepreneurship on economy growth and development in Nigeria. Journal of Human Resources and management Science, 2(2), 108-124. https://hummingbirdjournals.com/hrms/article/view/108

Chen, X., Adebayo, R., & Tan, H. (2021). Entrepreneurship education and youth employability in Sub-Saharan Africa. Journal of Youth and Entrepreneurship, 10(1), 15–31.

Chinelo, A., Abbas, M., & Wang, X. (2022). Integration of entrepreneurship into non-business programs in Nigerian tertiary institutions. African Journal of Educational Research, 22(3), 77–91.

Chukwuma, J., Bello, A., & Hassan, M. (2022). Investigating predictors of entrepreneurial intention among Nigerian youth. Entrepreneurship Development Studies, 7(4), 198–212.

Emeka, C., Agho, S., & Udeh, M. (2023). Re-thinking poverty eradication through education and entrepreneurship. African Economic Review, 20(2), 91–107.

Fatima, S. K., Bello, A., & wahab, S. A. (2022). Entrepreneurial alertness and intention among university students: The moderating role of entrepreneurship education. International Journal of Business and Technopreneurship, 12(1)x, 45-58.

Fayolle, A., & Gailley, B. (2015). The impact of entrepreneurship education on entrepreneurial attitudes and intention: Hysteresis and persistence. Journal of Business Venturing, 30(1), 75-93. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jbusvent.2014.07.001      

Ferreira, L., Silva, J., & Martins, D. (2022). Youth entrepreneurship for sustainable national development. International Journal of Social Innovation, 17(3), 129–145.

Hair, J. F., Ringle, C. M., & Sarstedt, M. 92011). PLS-SEM: Indeed a silver bullet. Journal of Marketing Theory and Practice, 19(2), 139-152. https://doi.org/10.2753/MTP1069-6679190202   

Ibrahim, A. M., Musa, I., & Zhang, Q. (2023). Digital media literacy and entrepreneurial intention: The mediating role of self-efficacy among university students. International Journal of Professional Business Review, 8(5), e01854. https://doi.org/10.266668/businessreview/2023.v815.1854

Idowu, T. (2023). Economic policies and youth entrepreneurship in Nigeria. Nigerian Journal of Public Administration, 19(1), 12–28.

Johnson, O., Adeoye, A., & Chen, Y. (2023). Human capital development and entrepreneurship for national progress. Global Journal of Human Resources and Development, 13(4), 154-171.

Khan, S. A. R., Yusuf, S., Ali, S. S., Sharma, A., & Adeel, S. (2021). Influence of financial literacy and educational skills on entrepreneurial intent: Empirical evidence from young entrepreneurs of Pakistan. Journal of Asian Finance, Economics and Business, 8(1), 697-710.https://doi.org/10.13106/jafeb.2021.vol8.no1.697

Krejcie, R. V., & Morgan, D. W. (1970). Determining sample size for research activities. Educational and Psychological Measurement, 30(3), 607–610.

Krueger, N. F., Reilly, M. D., & Carsrud, A. L. (2000). Competing models of entrepreneurial intentions. Journal of Business Venturing, 15(5-6), 411-432. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0883-9026(98)00033-0   

Liang, J., Adesina, R., & Wang, Y. (2024). Gender differences in entrepreneurial intention across three countries. Entrepreneurship and Gender Studies, 8(1), 49–67.

Linan, F., & Chen, Y.-W. (2009). Development and cross-cultural application of a specific instrument to measure entrepreneurial intentions. Entrepreneurship Theory and Practice, 33(3), 593-617. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1540-6520.2009.00318.x 

Martins, J. M., Lima, T. M., & Correia, S. C. (2022). Entrepreneurial intention and the influence of personality traits: A study among university students. International Journal of Professional Business Review, 7(1), eo323.https://doi.org/10.266668/businessreview/2022.v7i1.323

Nasir, M., Okechukwu, P., & Fu, L. (2021). Student entrepreneurial attitudes and intentions: Evidence from Malaysian polytechnics. International Journal of Business and Management, 16(3), 50–63.

Nasir, A., Lukman, S., Adisa, W. B., & Olaniyan, S. O. (2023). Entrepreneurial orientation and performance of small and medium enterprises in Nigeria. The moderating role of institutional environment. International Journal of Research and Innovation in Social Science, 7(9), 1145-1162. https://doi.org/10.47772/,2023.7991 

Noor, M. S. M., Idris, A., & Hassan, Z. (2021). Assessing the relationship between entrepreneurship education, entrepreneurial mindset and intention among university students. International Journal of Academic Research in Business and Social Sciences, 11(3), 854-869. https://doi.org/10.6007/IJARBSS/v11-i3/8975   

Nor, M. M., Idris, A., Fatah, A. M., & Salim, N. (2022). The impact of human resource management practices on employee performance among government servants in Malaysia. International Journal of Academic Research in Business and Social Sciences, 12(10), 2584-2594. https://doi.org/10.46886/IJARBSS/v12-i10/12051

Nwachukwu, C., Gomez, J. M., & Xu, S. (2022). Entrepreneurial intention and startup preparation: A study among nosiness students. Journal of Business and Socio-Economic Development, 2(1), 1-15. https://doi.org/10.1108/JBSED-01-2022-0010

Ogunyemi, A. O., Raji, A. A., & Zhang, Q. (2022). The impact of entrepreneurship education on entrepreneurial intention: The mediating role entrepreneurial self-efficacy. International Journal of Research in Business and Social Sciences, 11(4), 112-121. https://doi.org/10.20525/ijrbs.v11i4.1812 

Okafor, M., Ezen0wa, P., & Oyetunji, B. (2021). Entrepreneurial ecosystems and national development. Journal of Policy Research and Innovation, 14(4), 209–224.

Okeke, C. D., Yusuf, S. A., & Bello, M. B. (2021). Vocational skills acquisition and entrepreneurial intention among undergraduates in Nigeria. Journal of management and Social Sciences, 10(2), 442-456.

Okeke, M. N., Nwankwo, K. O., & Ubah, J. I. (2023). Environmental factors and entrepreneurial intentions of graduating students in Nigerian universities. International Journal of Business and Management Review, 11(4), 18-34.

Okon, E. E., & Bello, K. S. (2022). Financial innovation and the growth of emerging markets in Nigeria. Journal of management and Social Science Research, 3(1), 45-59. 

Okon, J. E., Bello, A. S., & Wang, Y. (2022). Digital media and entrepreneurship intention among university students. Journal of Business and Economic Development, 7(2), 45-58. 

Okonjo, N. P., Felix, A. O., & Wang, Y. (2024). Human capital development and social entrepreneurial intention: A comparative analysis of digital literacy among university students. Journal of Global Entrepreneurship Research, 14(1), 112-129. https://doi.org/10.1007/s40497-024-00381-w

Olowolaju, P. S., Shah, S. Z. A., & Ridwan, M. S. (2023). Determinants of entrepreneurial intention among university students: An empirical study. International Journal of Professional Business review, 8(6), e01942. https://doi.org/10.266668/business review/2023.v8i6.1942 

Oyelola, B., Bakare, S., & Adebayo, K. (2021). Cognitive antecedents of entrepreneurial

            intention among final-year students. Entrepreneurship and Development Review, 12(3),   

            89–106.

Patel, R., Sharma, S., & Bhatnagar, V. (2023). Digital entrepreneurship and financial inclusion: The role of FinTech in driving sustainable growth. Journal of Business and Economic Research, 21(4), 312-330. https:/doi.org/10.1016/j.busres.2023.10.015

Petronova, N. P., Kuznetsova, A. V., & Romanova, N. V. (2023). Assessment of digitalization of paid services and services of the regions of the Russian Federation based on a multipara metric data analysis. Journal of Applied Economic Research, 2(3), 542-566. https://doi.org/10.15826/vestnik.2023.22.3.024 

Popescu, C. R. G., & Diu, M. S. (2023). The influence of economic and entrepreneurial education on perception and attitudes towards entrepreneurship. Sustainability, 15(20), 14793. https://doi.org/10.3390/su152o14793

Rahman, M. A., Tsn, S. L., & Othman, A. H. A. (2022). Influence of entrepreneurship education, self-efficacy, and university support on entrepreneurship intention. Journal of Business and management Studies, 4(2), 241-252. https://doi.org/10.32996/jbms.2022.4.2.19

Rahim, A. B., Ishola, S. A., & Le, T. H. (2023). Determinants of green entrepreneurial intention among university students: An application of planned behavior. Journal of Cleaner Production, 385(1), 135-150, https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jclepro.2022.135684

Pulka, B. M., Aminu, A. A., & Rikwentishe, R. 92015). The impact of entrepreneurship education on entrepreneurial intentions of university students in Nigeria. International Journal of Research in Business Studies and Management, 2(9), 1-11. 

Pulido, M., Azubuike, E., & Zhou, Q. (2024). Entrepreneurial transformation in higher education:

A longitudinal study. Higher Education and Entrepreneurship Research, 9(1), 15–38.

Saidu, M., Ibrahim, G., & Chen, X. (2023). Psychological foundations of entrepreneurial intention in African universities. Journal of Contemporary Entrepreneurial Studies,

          15(2), 74–89.

Salim, R., Farouk, A., & Nor, M. (2021). Exploring cognitive foundations of entrepreneurial intention. Global Business and Management Review, 11(1), 23–38

Sekaran, U., & Bougie, R. (2010). Research methods for business: A skill building approach (5th ed.). John Wiley & sons.

Silva, T. H., Pereira, Y. L., & Oliveira, L. B. (2023). Higher education’s influence on social networks and entrepreneurial intention. Journal of Entrepreneurship and Small Business, 15(3), 210-228.

Suleiman, M., Adamu, S., & Ibrahim, N. (2024). Entrepreneurial orientation among Nigerian undergraduates. International Journal of Business Studies, 28(1), 65–80.

Trang, I., & Mintardjo, C. M. (2018). The influence of entrepreneurship education on entrepreneurial intention through self-efficacy and motivation.  International Journal of Applied Business and International Management, 3(2), 1-11. https://doi.org/10.32535/ijabim.v3i2.131

Walters, T., Onuoha, M., & Makinde, F. (2023). Harnessing youth for sustainable development in West Africa. Journal of Youth Policy & Innovation, 17(2), 39–54.

Yakubu, H., Hassan, M., & Omeje, T. (2022). Poverty and entrepreneurship in Nigeria: A

           paradox? Nigerian Journal of Economic Reforms, 13(3), 44–60.

Call for Papers – 2026

📢 Call for Papers – 2026

International Journal of Research (IJR)

📧 Submit at: ijr@ijrjournal.com
🌐 Journal Website: https://www.ijrjournal.com

The International Journal of Research (IJR) invites original and high-quality research papers for publication in its 2026 issues. IJR is a peer-reviewed, open-access international journal committed to promoting multidisciplinary research and making scholarly knowledge accessible to researchers, academicians, professionals, and students across the globe.


🔍 About the Journal

The International Journal of Research (IJR) is a monthly, peer-reviewed academic journal that provides an inclusive platform for publishing original research articles, review papers, case studies, conceptual papers, and short communications. The journal follows a double-blind peer review process to ensure academic rigor, originality, and quality.

IJR strongly supports open-access publishing, allowing published articles to be freely accessible worldwide without subscription barriers.


📚 Scope of the Journal

IJR is multidisciplinary in nature and welcomes submissions from a wide range of academic and professional fields, including but not limited to:

  • Engineering and Technology
  • Architecture and Planning
  • Computer Science and Information Technology
  • Management and Commerce
  • Social Sciences and Humanities
  • Education and Psychology
  • Environmental Studies and Sustainability
  • Life Sciences and Agriculture
  • Health Sciences and Public Policy
  • Economics, Finance, and Development Studies

Interdisciplinary and applied research papers are highly encouraged.


✍️ Types of Papers Accepted

  • Original Research Articles
  • Review Papers
  • Case Studies
  • Conceptual and Theoretical Papers
  • Short Research Communications

All submissions must be original, unpublished, and not under consideration elsewhere.


💰 Publication Fee (APC)

To support affordable and inclusive academic publishing:

Open Access Publication Fee: Only USD 10
✅ No submission fee
✅ No hidden charges

This minimal APC makes IJR one of the most affordable peer-reviewed open-access journals, especially beneficial for students, early-career researchers, and scholars from developing countries.


🧪 Peer Review & Ethics

  • Double-blind peer review
  • Plagiarism check before acceptance
  • Ethical publishing standards followed strictly
  • Constructive reviewer feedback provided

IJR aims for a fast yet rigorous review process without compromising publication quality.


📅 Important Dates

  • Submission Open: Ongoing (for 2026 issues)
  • Review Time: Short and efficient
  • Publication: Monthly issues throughout 2026

Early submissions are encouraged for priority review and publication.


📤 How to Submit

Authors are requested to send their manuscripts via email:

📧 ijr@ijrjournal.com

Include:

  • Manuscript (MS Word format)
  • Author details and affiliations
  • Declaration of originality

Detailed author guidelines are available on the journal website:
🌐 https://www.ijrjournal.com


🌍 Why Publish with IJR?

✔ Peer-reviewed international journal
✔ Open access for global visibility
✔ Very low APC (USD 10 only)
✔ Monthly publication
✔ Multidisciplinary scope
✔ DOI assignment and proper indexing process
✔ Supportive editorial team


📌 Submit your research and be part of the 2026 scholarly community of IJR.

For queries, feel free to contact: ijr@ijrjournal.com

We look forward to your valuable contributions!

Call for Papers- International Journal of Research (IJR)

📢 Call for Papers

International Journal of Research (IJR)

The International Journal of Research (IJR) invites original and high-quality research papers for publication in its upcoming issues. IJR is a peer-reviewed, open-access international journal that provides a global platform for researchers, academicians, professionals, and students to disseminate their scholarly work across a wide range of disciplines.

🌐 Journal Website: https://ijrjournal.com
📧 Paper Submission Email: ijr@ijrjournal.com
💲 Article Processing Charge (APC): Just USD 10 (One-time, after acceptance)


About the Journal

The International Journal of Research (IJR) is committed to promoting accessible, affordable, and ethical scholarly publishing. As an open-access journal, IJR ensures that all published articles are freely available to readers worldwide, thereby enhancing visibility, citation potential, and academic impact.

The journal follows a rigorous peer-review process to maintain academic quality while ensuring a fast and transparent review timeline, making it especially suitable for early-career researchers and scholars from developing regions.


Scope of the Journal

IJR is multidisciplinary in nature and welcomes research contributions from (but not limited to) the following areas:

  • Social Sciences and Humanities
  • Education and Pedagogy
  • Management, Commerce, and Economics
  • Science and Technology
  • Engineering and Applied Sciences
  • Architecture, Planning, and Design
  • Environmental Studies and Sustainability
  • Law, Public Policy, and Governance
  • Health, Psychology, and Allied Sciences
  • Interdisciplinary and Emerging Research Areas

Both theoretical and empirical studies are encouraged.


Types of Papers Accepted

The journal accepts the following categories of manuscripts:

  • Original Research Articles
  • Review Papers
  • Case Studies
  • Conceptual Papers
  • Short Communications
  • Book Reviews

All submissions must be original, unpublished, and not under consideration by any other journal.


Why Publish with IJR?

✔ Open Access publication
✔ Very low APC – only USD 10
✔ International editorial and reviewer base
✔ Fast peer-review and publication process
✔ DOI assignment for published articles
✔ Global visibility and readership
✔ Author-friendly submission process

IJR strongly supports inclusive academic publishing, making research publication affordable without compromising scholarly standards.


Submission Guidelines

Authors are requested to submit their manuscripts in MS Word format to:
📧 ijr@ijrjournal.com

The manuscript should include:

  • Title and author details
  • Abstract and keywords
  • Main text with proper references
  • Declaration of originality

Detailed author guidelines are available on the journal website:
🌐 https://ijrjournal.com


Important Dates

📌 Submission: Open (Rolling submissions accepted)
📌 Review Process: Fast and peer-reviewed
📌 Publication: Immediately after acceptance and APC payment


Invitation to Authors

The editorial board of IJR warmly invites researchers, faculty members, PhD scholars, postgraduate students, and independent researchers to submit their valuable work and become part of a growing international research community.

📨 Submit your paper today to:
ijr@ijrjournal.com

🔗 Visit the journal: https://ijrjournal.com

Call for Papers – International Journal of Research (IJR)

🌐 Call for Papers – International Journal of Research (IJR)
📖 A Premier Platform for Scholarly Publishing Across Disciplines
📝 Website: www.ijrjournal.com
📧 Email: ijr@ijrjournal.com
ISSN (Online): 2348-6848 | ISSN (Print): 2348-795X
Impact Factor: 8.2 | Monthly | Peer-Reviewed | Open Access


The International Journal of Research (IJR) is pleased to invite original and high-quality manuscripts for publication in its upcoming issues. With a strong commitment to academic excellence, research integrity, and the promotion of knowledge, IJR offers an inclusive platform for scholars, academicians, professionals, and researchers to share their findings with a global audience.

Established as a multidisciplinary, peer-reviewed, and open-access journal, IJR is recognized for its rigorous editorial process, transparent peer-review system, and global reach. It serves as a forum for the exchange of ideas and advancements across a wide range of fields and disciplines.


🌟 About the Journal

The International Journal of Research (IJR) is published monthly and maintains a strict double-blind peer-review process to ensure the integrity and academic merit of every submission. Our editorial board comprises distinguished scholars, researchers, and professionals from around the world who are committed to maintaining the highest standards in academic publishing.

With an impact factor of 8.2, IJR continues to gain prominence as one of the most reliable, credible, and accessible journals for researchers who wish to reach a wider academic and professional readership.


📚 Areas of Interest

IJR accepts papers from all disciplines, with particular interest in the following areas:

  • Humanities and Social Sciences – Sociology, Psychology, Political Science, Anthropology, History, Literature, Philosophy
  • Science and Technology – Physics, Chemistry, Mathematics, Earth Sciences, Environmental Science
  • Engineering and Applied Sciences – Civil, Mechanical, Electrical, Computer, and Software Engineering
  • Medical and Life Sciences – Medicine, Nursing, Public Health, Biology, Biotechnology, Pharmacy
  • Business and Management Studies – Finance, Marketing, Human Resource Management, Economics
  • Education and Pedagogy – Educational Theory, Learning Technologies, Curriculum Development
  • Law, Policy, and Governance – Public Administration, Legal Studies, Ethics, and Policy Analysis
  • Interdisciplinary Studies – Bridging multiple academic perspectives to solve complex issues

📝 Types of Submissions Accepted

  • Original Research Articles
  • Review Articles and Literature Surveys
  • Case Studies and Technical Reports
  • Short Communications and Concept Papers
  • Conference Papers (Extended Versions)

⏰ Important Dates and Timeline

  • Final Submission Deadline: 25th of each month
  • Initial Decision: Within 5–7 working days
  • Revisions & Final Decision: 7–10 days (if required)
  • Online Publication: Between 28th–30th of each month
  • Print Issue Dispatch: Within 10 days of online publication

🧾 Publication Benefits

  • Rapid Review and Publishing Process
  • DOI (Digital Object Identifier) for Every Paper
  • e-Certificate of Publication for Each Author
  • High Visibility Through Indexing in Major Databases
  • Opportunity to Publish Special Issues and Edited Volumes
  • Support for Early-Career Researchers and Scholars from Developing Countries
  • Print Copies Available on Request

💵 Article Processing Charges

A nominal fee is charged to cover editorial, peer-review, archiving, DOI registration, and publication costs.
Discounts and waivers are available for authors from low-income countries, NGOs, and students. Please write to us for more information.


🔗 How to Submit

We accept submissions via email and through our online portal.

📧 Email your manuscript in .doc/.docx format to: ijr@ijrjournal.com
🌐 Or submit directly through our website: www.ijrjournal.com

Manuscripts should follow our submission guidelines, which are available on the website. Each manuscript should be accompanied by a declaration of originality and a short bio of the author(s).


📣 Final Note

Publishing in IJR means becoming part of a vibrant community of scholars committed to advancing knowledge, promoting open access, and contributing to meaningful academic and professional dialogue. Whether you are an academic, a postgraduate researcher, or an independent thinker, IJR provides the right platform to amplify your voice and document your insights.

We look forward to your contribution.


📨 For submissions and queries:
📧 ijr@ijrjournal.com
🌐 www.ijrjournal.com

International Journal of Research (IJR)
Where Knowledge Meets Impact

LionHeart Family Institute Expresses Concerns Over Academic Challenges for Christian Scholars

Daily writing prompt
If you had the power to change one law, what would it be and why?

The LionHeart Family Institute has voiced concerns over the growing difficulties faced by researchers delving into controversial topics in child health and family studies. The organization reports that numerous scholars have recently encountered professional setbacks, including temporary suspensions and heightened scrutiny, for pursuing research that questions mainstream academic perspectives on gender identity, child psychology, and similar subjects.

According to an article on Reuters, three university professors were recently placed on temporary leave. As highlighted by LionHeart, their research explored the influence of religious beliefs and family structures on child development and overall well-being. Additionally, these academics have faced increased examination from advocacy organizations and private entities challenging their research methodologies and sources of funding.

Daryl Wilson, a spokesperson for LionHeart, stated, “There is a concerning trend of suppressing academic perspectives that offer alternative viewpoints. Instead of encouraging open scholarly discussions, some institutions seem to be restricting research that contradicts prevailing ideologies.”

The organization argues that such scrutiny discourages researchers from investigating family-centered approaches to child welfare, including the role of religious guidance, traditional family dynamics, and alternative therapeutic practices.

Concerns About Bias in Research Funding

The LionHeart Family Institute has also raised concerns about potential bias in research funding, particularly in child health and psychology. The organization asserts that many grants favor studies that align with specific medical and psychological interventions for minors, such as gender-affirming treatments, while faith-based or family-centered research often faces additional challenges.

“It seems that funding institutions and academic bodies tend to support research that aligns with prevailing social and political ideologies,” said Dr. John Leo Grimani, CEO of LionHeart Family Institute. “Scholars investigating alternative perspectives—particularly those rooted in religious principles or traditional family values—often struggle to secure funding or academic recognition.”

Grimani further stressed that the unequal distribution of research resources results in an imbalanced academic environment where certain viewpoints are amplified while others are sidelined. “Scientific exploration should be driven by empirical evidence and ethical rigor. A variety of perspectives must be considered. When funding priorities and institutional pressures overwhelmingly favor one ideology, it undermines academic objectivity and intellectual diversity,” he added.

Championing Academic Freedom

In light of these issues, the LionHeart Family Institute is advocating for universities and research institutions to protect academic freedom and impartiality. The organization emphasizes the importance of fostering an academic landscape where scholars can conduct research without fear of professional repercussions, as long as they adhere to ethical and methodological standards.

“Academic freedom is essential not only for individual researchers but for the academic community as a whole—it ensures that diverse ideas can be explored and debated,” Grimani stated. “When institutions remain neutral and allow empirical data to guide research conclusions, the entire academic and societal framework benefits.”

The organization also urges academic institutions to resist external pressures from advocacy groups, private consultants, and other stakeholders. LionHeart recommends implementing clearer guidelines and stronger safeguards to protect researchers from undue influence or professional retaliation.

Advocating for Open Scientific Dialogue

The overarching message from the LionHeart Family Institute is a call for open and transparent scientific discussion. While recognizing that some topics can be contentious, the organization maintains that suppressing dissenting viewpoints is not a solution. Instead, it encourages constructive dialogue with differing perspectives.

“Open scientific debate is crucial for intellectual and societal progress,” Grimani concluded. “Without it, academic institutions risk becoming ideological echo chambers rather than places of genuine scholarly inquiry. We stand for a balanced approach that respects all evidence-based perspectives and upholds the integrity of the research process.”

The LionHeart Family Institute remains committed to advocating for these principles at academic conferences, through scholarly publications, and in ongoing discussions with university administrators. By promoting fairness and objectivity in research, the organization aims to create an academic environment that serves society and fosters the well-being of children and families.

The Digital Horizon: How the Metaverse is Reshaping Life as We Know It

While many still view the metaverse as a buzzword or a tech trend of the future, it has already begun to infiltrate various aspects of our lives. Virtual platforms such as Holiverse and The Sandbox are spearheading this shift, creating digital spaces where people can work, learn, and socialize.

According to an article on Techstory, this change isn’t sudden. The metaverse has been gradually evolving, driven by innovations in VR, AR, and blockchain technology. What’s crucial now is to understand the opportunities it presents and act before it’s too late.

Digital pioneers are already benefiting from new income streams. Play-to-earn games and virtual real estate investments have opened doors to wealth generation reminiscent of the early cryptocurrency days. Holiverse exemplifies the possibilities of digital entrepreneurship, where users are not merely consumers but active participants in building the virtual economy.

Moreover, beyond economics, the metaverse is making significant inroads in fields such as education and healthcare. Virtual classrooms allow students to engage in hands-on learning without leaving their homes. In healthcare, augmented reality assists surgeons in performing complex operations with enhanced accuracy and lower risk.

In the realm of employment, the metaverse is generating new career paths. From virtual event organizers to digital fashion designers, the opportunities are vast. IKEA’s virtual store in Roblox, where employees interact with customers in a fully digital environment, is a prime example of how traditional businesses are entering this space.

Education is undergoing a revolution as well. Platforms like Prisms VR and Bodyswaps provide immersive learning experiences, helping students develop both hard and soft skills. Students can now explore virtual laboratories, practice public speaking, or even learn to navigate a plane through a storm — all within the safety of a virtual environment.

Healthcare professionals are also leveraging metaverse technologies. AR-assisted surgeries have already been successfully performed, and the use of digital twins allows doctors to simulate procedures before conducting them on real patients. These advancements are improving outcomes and reducing risks in critical medical procedures.

The metaverse isn’t just a technological evolution; it’s a transformative force reshaping multiple aspects of our daily lives. The line between digital and physical realities is becoming increasingly blurred, heralding a new era of interconnected experiences.

Call for Guest post on IJR internationaljournalofresearch.com High Impact Domain

Daily writing prompt
What is something others do that sparks your admiration?

Call for Guest Posts on IJR (International Journal of Research)

The International Journal of Research (IJR) is inviting guest post submissions from writers, scholars, researchers, and domain experts to contribute high-quality articles on a variety of academic, scientific, and interdisciplinary topics. This platform offers an opportunity to showcase expertise, contribute to global knowledge sharing, and engage with a large community of academics and professionals.

In this article, we will explore the call for guest posts on IJR, why you should consider submitting your work, the high-impact domain areas covered by the journal, and the process for submitting a guest post.


Introduction to the International Journal of Research (IJR)

The International Journal of Research (IJR) is a well-established academic platform dedicated to the publication of research papers, articles, and scholarly content in a wide range of disciplines. With a focus on research-driven content, IJR aims to foster intellectual growth and knowledge dissemination across various domains. The journal has gained a reputation for publishing impactful research, contributing to the advancement of global knowledge.

The call for guest posts on IJR is a special initiative to invite contributions from external writers and experts in the field. Guest posts serve as an excellent opportunity for individuals to showcase their expertise, introduce innovative ideas, and contribute valuable insights to the academic community.


Why Contribute a Guest Post to IJR?

  1. Global Reach and Audience: IJR has a vast readership that includes scholars, educators, researchers, and professionals from around the world. By submitting a guest post, you can increase your visibility and share your work with a global audience interested in high-quality research and academic content.
  2. Exposure to Academic and Professional Communities: Writing a guest post for IJR can lead to networking opportunities and collaborations with fellow academics and professionals in your field. It’s a great platform to establish your presence in your domain of expertise.
  3. Contribute to Knowledge Dissemination: Contributing to a high-impact academic journal like IJR allows you to be part of a broader effort to disseminate knowledge and contribute to scientific, technological, and scholarly advancements in your discipline.
  4. Build Credibility and Authority: By being featured as a guest author on IJR, you position yourself as a thought leader in your area of expertise. Publishing in such a reputable journal boosts your academic portfolio and enhances your credibility in the academic community.
  5. Enhance Your Professional Profile: Whether you are an academic researcher, a professional in the industry, or an aspiring writer, publishing guest posts in IJR can add value to your professional profile. It showcases your writing skills and research acumen to potential employers, collaborators, or institutions.

High-Impact Domain Areas for Guest Posts

IJR welcomes contributions across a broad spectrum of academic fields, ensuring that your article will be part of a diverse, well-rounded journal. Some of the high-impact domains covered by IJR include:

  1. Science and Technology
    • Artificial Intelligence and Machine Learning
    • Blockchain and Cryptography
    • Internet of Things (IoT)
    • Robotics and Automation
    • Environmental Science and Sustainability
    • Nanotechnology and Biotechnology
    • Space Science and Astronomy
    • Data Science and Big Data Analytics
    • Cybersecurity and Data Privacy
  2. Health and Medical Research
    • Medical Innovations and Breakthroughs
    • Epidemiology and Public Health
    • Mental Health and Behavioral Sciences
    • Pharmaceutical Sciences and Drug Development
    • Healthcare Management and Policy
    • Genetics and Genomic Research
    • Health Informatics and Digital Health
  3. Business and Economics
    • Economic Policy and Development
    • Business Management and Strategy
    • Entrepreneurship and Startups
    • Marketing and Consumer Behavior
    • Finance and Investment Strategies
    • Corporate Social Responsibility (CSR)
    • International Trade and Global Markets
  4. Education and Social Sciences
    • Educational Psychology
    • Curriculum Development and Pedagogy
    • Social Work and Community Development
    • Human Rights and Social Justice
    • Political Science and International Relations
    • Sociology and Anthropology
    • Gender Studies and Equality
  5. Arts, Humanities, and Literature
    • Cultural Studies and Philosophy
    • History and Archaeology
    • Literary Criticism and Analysis
    • Linguistics and Language Studies
    • Art and Music Theory
    • Performing Arts and Film Studies
    • Ethics and Social Philosophy
  6. Engineering and Applied Sciences
    • Civil Engineering and Infrastructure
    • Mechanical Engineering and Manufacturing
    • Electrical and Electronics Engineering
    • Chemical Engineering
    • Aerospace and Marine Engineering
    • Renewable Energy Systems
    • Material Science and Engineering

Guest Post Submission Guidelines

If you are interested in contributing a guest post to IJR, it is important to follow the submission guidelines to ensure your work is considered for publication. Below are the key guidelines for submitting a guest post:

  1. Topic Relevance: Ensure that your article is relevant to the high-impact domain areas listed above. Your guest post should address a specific issue or provide insights that add value to existing knowledge in your field.
  2. Original Content: Your article must be original and not published elsewhere. Plagiarism or duplicate content is strictly prohibited. It should reflect your own ideas, research findings, and perspectives.
  3. Research and Evidence-Based: Articles should be based on sound research and factual information. Proper citations and references should be included for any data, studies, or research findings cited.
  4. Article Length: Guest posts should typically range from 1,000 to 2,500 words depending on the topic and depth of the content. The article should be comprehensive yet concise and engaging.
  5. Language and Clarity: Articles should be written in clear, academic English. Avoid jargon or overly complex language that may confuse readers. The content should be accessible to a wide academic audience.
  6. Formatting: Use standard formatting, including 12-point font size, Times New Roman, and 1.5 line spacing. Ensure that the article is well-structured with appropriate headings, subheadings, and paragraphs.
  7. Supporting Materials: If relevant, include images, graphs, charts, or tables that enhance the clarity of your content. These visuals must be properly credited and of high quality.
  8. Submission Process: Submit your guest post via the designated submission form on the IJR website. You may also be required to provide a brief author bio, including your academic background and expertise in the field.
  9. Peer Review Process: All submitted guest posts undergo a peer-review process to ensure the quality and accuracy of the content. Feedback will be provided, and revisions may be requested before final publication.

How to Submit Your Guest Post to IJR

To submit a guest post, follow these simple steps:

  1. Visit the IJR website (http://www.internationaljournalofresearch.com).
  2. Navigate to the “Submit a Guest Post” section.
  3. Complete the submission form, including your article title, full content, and any supporting materials.
  4. Attach your author bio and any relevant references or citations.
  5. Submit your article for review.

Upon successful submission, your article will be reviewed by the editorial team. You will be notified about the acceptance or feedback for revisions. Once approved, your guest post will be published and promoted through IJR’s global channels.


Conclusion

Submitting a guest post to the International Journal of Research (IJR) is a fantastic opportunity for academics, professionals, and experts to share their knowledge and research with a broad, international audience. The high-impact domains covered by IJR ensure that there is a wide range of topics to explore, making it an ideal platform for those wishing to contribute meaningful content to the academic community.

By adhering to the submission guidelines and providing well-researched, original content, you can have your work published in a reputable academic journal and make a lasting impact in your field.

Take the first step today and become part of a global network of scholars and researchers committed to knowledge advancement.

How to Create and Use an ORCID ID

An ORCID ID (Open Researcher and Contributor ID) is a unique identifier for researchers and authors, designed to distinguish their work and contributions from those of others. Here’s a step-by-step guide on how to create and effectively use your ORCID ID.

Step 1: Creating an ORCID ID

  1. Visit the ORCID Website:
  2. Sign Up:
    • Click on the “Register” button.
    • Fill in your details, including your name, email address, and a password. You will also need to agree to the terms of use and privacy policy.
  3. Complete Your Profile:
    • Once registered, you can start adding information to your ORCID profile:
      • Personal Information: Add your affiliations, biography, and other relevant details.
      • Research Outputs: Link or add your publications, presentations, and datasets. You can do this manually or by importing from various databases.
  4. Choose Privacy Settings:
    • ORCID allows you to control who can see your information. You can make your profile public, limited to trusted parties, or private.
  5. Save Your ORCID ID:
    • Your ORCID ID will be a unique alphanumeric string (e.g., 0000-0001-2345-6789). Save it somewhere accessible, as you’ll use it in future applications and submissions.

Step 2: Using Your ORCID ID

  1. Include in Publications:
    • Add your ORCID ID to your publications, grant applications, and CVs. This ensures that your work is correctly attributed to you.
  2. Link to Other Profiles:
    • Link your ORCID ID to other research networks and profiles (e.g., ResearchGate, Google Scholar). This helps consolidate your academic presence.
  3. Manage Your Works:
    • Regularly update your ORCID profile with new publications, projects, and collaborations. You can import works from databases like CrossRef, PubMed, or Scopus.
  4. Use in Grant Applications:
    • Many funding agencies now require an ORCID ID for grant applications. Ensure you include it to streamline your application process.
  5. Collaborate with Others:
    • Share your ORCID ID with collaborators to facilitate the attribution of joint works.
  6. Monitor Your Impact:
    • ORCID provides features to track your publications and citations over time, helping you gauge your research impact.

Benefits of Having an ORCID ID

  • Unique Identification: Distinguishes you from other researchers with similar names.
  • Simplifies Attribution: Ensures that all your work is linked to you, enhancing visibility and credibility.
  • Enhances Discoverability: Increases the likelihood of your research being found by others in your field.
  • Integration with Journals: Many academic journals and publishers are integrating ORCID IDs into their submission processes, making it easier to link works.

Conclusion

Creating and using an ORCID ID is a vital step for any researcher or academic professional. It enhances the visibility of your work, simplifies the management of your research output, and facilitates collaboration. By taking a few moments to set up your ORCID profile, you can significantly improve how your contributions are recognized and credited in the academic community.An ORCID ID (Open Researcher and Contributor ID) is a unique identifier for researchers and authors, designed to distinguish their work and contributions from those of others. Here’s a step-by-step guide on how to create and effectively use your ORCID ID.

Step 1: Creating an ORCID ID

  1. Visit the ORCID Website:
  2. Sign Up:
    • Click on the “Register” button.
    • Fill in your details, including your name, email address, and a password. You will also need to agree to the terms of use and privacy policy.
  3. Complete Your Profile:
    • Once registered, you can start adding information to your ORCID profile:
      • Personal Information: Add your affiliations, biography, and other relevant details.
      • Research Outputs: Link or add your publications, presentations, and datasets. You can do this manually or by importing from various databases.
  4. Choose Privacy Settings:
    • ORCID allows you to control who can see your information. You can make your profile public, limited to trusted parties, or private.
  5. Save Your ORCID ID:
    • Your ORCID ID will be a unique alphanumeric string (e.g., 0000-0001-2345-6789). Save it somewhere accessible, as you’ll use it in future applications and submissions.

Step 2: Using Your ORCID ID

  1. Include in Publications:
    • Add your ORCID ID to your publications, grant applications, and CVs. This ensures that your work is correctly attributed to you.
  2. Link to Other Profiles:
    • Link your ORCID ID to other research networks and profiles (e.g., ResearchGate, Google Scholar). This helps consolidate your academic presence.
  3. Manage Your Works:
    • Regularly update your ORCID profile with new publications, projects, and collaborations. You can import works from databases like CrossRef, PubMed, or Scopus.
  4. Use in Grant Applications:
    • Many funding agencies now require an ORCID ID for grant applications. Ensure you include it to streamline your application process.
  5. Collaborate with Others:
    • Share your ORCID ID with collaborators to facilitate the attribution of joint works.
  6. Monitor Your Impact:
    • ORCID provides features to track your publications and citations over time, helping you gauge your research impact.

Benefits of Having an ORCID ID

  • Unique Identification: Distinguishes you from other researchers with similar names.
  • Simplifies Attribution: Ensures that all your work is linked to you, enhancing visibility and credibility.
  • Enhances Discoverability: Increases the likelihood of your research being found by others in your field.
  • Integration with Journals: Many academic journals and publishers are integrating ORCID IDs into their submission processes, making it easier to link works.

Conclusion

Creating and using an ORCID ID is a vital step for any researcher or academic professional. It enhances the visibility of your work, simplifies the management of your research output, and facilitates collaboration. By taking a few moments to set up your ORCID profile, you can significantly improve how your contributions are recognized and credited in the academic community.

5 Proven Methods to Save Money on Proxies

The digital world demands investment in technology, and proxies are an essential part of this. However, these can get expensive quickly. You might find yourself wondering how to keep your devices secure and still stay within your budget. Don’t worry – you’re not stuck. Here are five proven methods to save money on proxies without ever compromising security.

Photo by Stefan Coders on Pexels.com

Defining Proxy Usage

Before diving headfirst into saving methods, it’s crucial to define how you’re using proxies in the first place. Were you aware that usage directly impacts cost? It does.

In line with online activities, different proxy types are needed. For businesses that scrape data from websites without getting banned or individuals who wish to anonymously browse the internet – a high-quality proxy is essential. More advanced usage typically comes with a heftier price tag.

Yet how often you use these proxies also matters. Infrequent users may not need the infrastructure that high-demand users necessitate. Therefore, understanding your proxy usage needs allows you to select the most cost-effective proxy solution without paying for unnecessary extras.

Paid vs Free Proxies

The web brims with free options; one might reason why pay for something you can get for free? Yet with proxies, this position could end up costing you more.

While free proxies look alluring due to their non-existent cost, they come with severe limitations, which could hamper productivity and jeopardize security. Using these often results in slow connections, broken or cluttered services, lack of customer support – complete chaos.

You’re therefore advised that if quality and reliable connection matter – steer clear of them. Instead, consider moderately-priced alternatives that provide acceptable performance rates coupled with robust security measures.

Investigating EarthWeb Coupons

Perhaps an unexpected avenue for saving on your proxies is through coupon sites – EarthWeb, specifically. EarthWeb Coupons are known for their steep discounts on various products and services, including proxies. EarthWeb is an excellent resource for those looking to balance their budgets but not sacrifice quality on their proxy choice.

Coupon sites not only provide substantive savings but also deliver variety. You can easily compare offers from different providers and analyze reviews before deciding. Like EarthWeb, it’s a hub of reputable providers that contain valuable information beyond just pricing – reliability ratings, performance statistics, etcetera giving you a holistic picture of what you’re getting before committing financially.

Investing in Shared Proxies

If you’re thinking of investing in proxies, consider shared ones. They’re less costly compared to private or dedicated proxies, making budget-friendly for businesses looking into cost-cutting without compromising operation efficiency.

Shared proxies are exactly what they sound like; collectively used by several users at a time. While this means the response time might be slightly slower as compared to private proxies (due to multiple simultaneous users), using shared proxies could be a practical option if speed is not your primary consideration – saving you considerable costs in the long run.

Benefit of Bulk Purchasing

If you need many proxies, consider buying them in bulk. Many proxy providers offer fantastic discounts for such purchases. Remember, stocks are cheaper when bought wholesale – proxies aren’t any different.

Purchasing cumbersome amounts of data may seem intimidating initially but remember that the more you buy, the lower the price tag. So it’s advisable to plan out your needs in advance and target discount seasons where you can bulk purchase proxies at discounted rates.

Affordable Annual Plans

On top of bulk buying, another effective way of saving money is by subscribing to annual proxy plans. Paying your proxy fees annually typically results in substantial savings compared to monthly subscriptions.

Several reputable providers offer healthy discounts on longer-term subscriptions. While an annual commitment might seem daunting, especially if you’re new to proxies – by thoroughly researching and understanding needs, planning your usage, costs can significantly decrease.

Plus, a longer subscription provides peace of mind as there’s no need for regular renewals or worry about sudden price escalations.

Sales and Discount Periods

Proxy providers have begun mirroring the retail practice of offering significant sales during peak seasons. Black Friday and Cyber Monday are key promotional periods for major tech brands and startups alike. Though tempting, companies and individual users planning their proxy services for the upcoming year should not lose sight of aligning discounted plans with actual needs.

Rather than jump at deals which might overdeliver bandwidth and capabilities, smart shoppers survey the provider landscape in advance. By forecasting usage across devices and campaigns, buyers can determine their ideal plan parameters and price point.

Risk Factors in Cheap Proxies

You’ve probably heard the saying “you get what you pay for”, and it’s particularly applicable when shopping for proxies. While offering short term savings, cheap proxies often end up proving expensive due to several hidden risks associated with them.

Cheap proxies often suffer from poor service reliability, lack of adequate cyber security features, limited server locations and poor customer support causing operational inefficiencies and potential data breaches. They also tend to be slower, which can significantly hamper your operations.

Ultimately, investing in quality proxies from a renowned and respected provider proves to be more cost-effective. It guarantees reliable service, safeguards vital information, and assures efficient business operations.

Negotiating with Providers

The highly competitive nature of the proxy marketplace gives you a good chance of negotiating deals with providers. Especially if you’re buying in bulk or committing for a longer term, most providers are willing to cut a deal to secure loyal customers.

Often prices listed on websites aren’t fixed and can be tailored according to specific requirements. Don’t hesitate to reach out to their sales team expressing your interest and possible negotiation room. Every penny saved counts towards meeting your bottom line.

Comparing Different Offers

As with any other purchase decision, comparison should form part of your strategy before buying proxies. The internet can expose users to cyber threats, so it’s important to understand what security features different providers offer. Each provider has its pricing model, features, speed, uptime statistics and so on, including whether enhanced cybersecurity is included or lacking. This makes direct comparisons sometimes difficult.

Using comparison websites or manually comparing providers helps decipher what’s available within one’s budget but still meets one’s needs adequately. Comparing different offerings ensures you’re getting the absolute best deal for your cash and aren’t overpaying. It also allows you to select a provider that aligns with your cybersecurity needs.

Avoid Unnecessary Add-Ons

No matter how attractive additional features may appear, stick to your original needs and refrain from unnecessary add-ons that increase costs. Do you really require unlimited bandwidth or premium privacy features? If not, steer clear.

Add-ons prove beneficial if they meet your direct needs. If they don’t align with your business objectives, consider them an unnecessary expenditure. Always evaluate your business needs before falling for extras bundled with your proxy server.

Educating About Scams

There’s lots of ways to save money on proxies, but unfortunately, the marketplace isn’t devoid of scams luring naive buyers with outrageous promises like “unlimited bandwidth for a negligible price”. Maintain a skeptical approach towards these too-good-to-be-true offers.

Instead of ending up paying for something which doesn’t exist or underserved – understand the market average pricing. If it’s far off this range – likely, it’s a scam. Be smart about purchases as any money saved from dodging scams constitutes savings on proxies.

Rounding it Up

In a time where staying anonymous online matters more than ever, proxies are essential tools used by businesses to ensure security and circumvent geographical barriers while economizing where possible. Every bit counts when saving, and by exploring different methods – you’re ensuring you never overpay while keeping operations efficient.

Study on Innovative and Effective Pedagogical Practices

By: Sushila & Dr. Yogendra Nath Chaubey

  1. Need of the Innovative and Effective Pedagogical practices:

Many research scholars have desired to move into a pedagogical approach that is more active, cooperative and learner-centered. However, the importance of explicative studies is undeniable; they clarify theoretical constructs or assist in the understanding how particular population samples differ. Biswas-Diener and Diener (2001), for example, sought to investigate the life satisfaction and subjective well-being of individuals living in poverty based within Calcutta. While the findings reported a negative perception of life satisfaction, it was found that each of the three groups differed, as did the level in which income impacted on satisfaction and levels of subjective well-being. Although it was found that, on average, participants in this sample maintained an overall negative life satisfaction score, they were ‘fairly satisfied’ with aspects of the ‘self’ and ‘social relationships’. Biswas-Diener and Diener (2001) additionally make a cultural observation of because; 

Photo by Monstera Production on Pexels.com

Indian respondents do not rate global areas higher than specific, it appears they do not exhibit a ‘positivity bias’ … [and that] it may be the Indians evaluate areas in a more even-handed way without focusing primarily on their best areas as Americans seem to do”.

There is an evident importance towards the student having a positive relationship with a teacher. The student-teacher relationship is mentioned in various whole school evaluation management, leadership and learning (WSE-MLL) as being “dynamic … [which] has resulted in caring, confident learners”. It is clear how the key strength in the provision of the curriculum is how teachers deliver the curriculum. There are recommendations of how teachers should consider using the local community and landmarks into their lessons by “researching and collating local history as part of the Local Studies strand of the history curriculum”, which speak more towards enhancing the curriculum rather than its delivery. 

Several WSEs report how there should be “greater use of collaborative, activity-based methods together with further Information and Communication Technology (ICT) initiatives”. Opportunities provided by extracurricular activities are said to cater for the “holistic education of pupils” and that by providing opportunities “to participate in a broad range of community-related events and extra-curricular activities” allow students to “benefit” in various ways. Teachers were also praised for their collaboration with members of staff in order to “provide a broad and balanced curriculum” and for their dedication in voluntarily leading “curriculum initiatives and pupil-support measures”. 

It is difficult to apply the findings from both the Department of Education and Skill (DES) and Growing Up in India (GUI) data for the purpose of supporting this research; what can be applied, however, are possibilities. It is mentioned in the GUI that 27% of students like school, 66% like school sometimes, and that 7% never like school; it is also reported that 53% of students like their teacher, 41% like their teacher sometimes, and that 6% never like their school teacher. 

The problem with using a Likert scale of three is that it can be difficult to determine whether the middle value is either positive or negative. For example, it is reported on the second page of this report that “a large majority of 9-year olds (93%) said they liked school at least ‘sometimes’. The remainder said they ‘never’ liked it”; this finding could also be written as ‘a large majority of 9-year olds (73%) said they never liked school at least sometimes’. The same is true for a student liking a teacher, 53% like their teacher ‘Always’ in comparison to ‘Never’ (6%). With regards to the 2012 dataset, 64.8% of students reported liking school more than ‘quite a bit’; while 7.1% reported not liking school very much and 2.4% reporting hating school. The specific percentages will need to be interpreted with some caution, however, but it can be argued that the general experience of students liking school within the GUI sample is positive. It can also be argued that the only certain finding in these statistics is that a student likes the teacher more than they like school (in the primary cohort only). 

  • Theme of the Research:

When observing each of the themes, from both primary and secondary school, it is apparent that a teacher is somewhat of a gatekeeper, being responsible for the planning, organisation, and assessment (all of which must be in line with the curriculum) of the students in their classroom.

In addition, the role of the management is to support the students by assisting the teacher, inside and outside of the classroom, by giving direct support to students that may need additional help. There is a slight difference in this WSE sample with secondary schools employing academic and personal guidance support, receiving special educational needs resource hours, support from the School Completion Programme, and having designated times for classes in ‘Social, Personal, and Health Education’. Primary schools appear to focus more on in-class support and whole class initiatives that support individual targeted students; taking the form of sports activities or after school groups. In both WSE samples, however, there is a need for additional student and teacher support in the form of organisation at a management level; by designating the available resources more appropriately, timetabling initiatives to support student wellbeing, revising and updating policies, and following the departmental guidelines for particular curriculum balances. However, while the qualitative WSE findings above indicate the importance of the development and delivery of a lesson, highlighting how teachers must prepare and organise the content of the lesson whilst taking into account the various other factors such as school policies and the availability of resources, there is no mention of teacher supports. 

There are advantages of having a management with a clear structure that allows its members to communicate and be communicated to, be active and support the school as a whole. In supporting the school as a whole also includes the staff. The theme of ‘Ownership and Management’ and ‘In-School Management’ talks mainly about the abilities of the board of management to adhere to the needs of the students and the requirement of the teachers in facilitating this need, to a certain extent. By taking this information and applying it to the articles that had been shared throughout social media creates an additional context outside of the WSE findings. For example, several articles draw attention to teacher strikes as a result of issues such as Junior Cycle reform. These issues would naturally cause some form of influence within the school environment, and therefore, the classroom. Although more research has been conducted on this topic outside of the context, Baker (2013) and Wills (2014) both highlight the negative effects that industrial action has at a classroom level. For example, when factoring for individual school and cohort characteristics, Baker (2013) found that teacher strikes can have a significant negative affect on a students’ test scores. Similarly, Wills (2014) claims that the “magnitude of the effect is roughly equivalent to a quarter of a years’ lost learning despite the average strike duration in these schools representing only seven per cent of official school days that year”. 

Wills (2014) found that in particular types of schools the performance of a student where a subject taught by a striking teacher was 10% of a standard deviation lower when compared against a subject being taught by a non-striking teacher and that there may be “lingering disruptive effects on student learning” as a result of strikes. These studies provide a particular perspective to this research project that had previously gone unnoticed. They raise the question of how effective a school community is at being able to communicate issues and support the staff that may be undergoing various levels of anxiety and stress. What this means is that, if the board of management was successful at communicating and supporting the teaching staff, the atmosphere would most likely be positive and reassuring but, if not, one could argue that this may cause an atmosphere of confusion, isolation, and increased levels of stress throughout the school. From the data gathered above, it is clear that there are multiple factors that influence the atmosphere and culture of a school, and by extension, educational research. 

  • Brief Literature Review 
  •  Importance of Interaction 

Wubbels and Brekelmans (2005) adopt the systems approach, proposed by Watzlawick, Beavin and Jackson (1967), arguing that every behaviour displayed by an individual while in the presence of another is a form of communication. Falling under this category, education is considered a continuous cycle of interaction where “one cannot not communicate when in the presence of someone else” which also infers that “whatever a person’s intentions are, others will infer meaning from this behaviour” (Wubbels & Brekelmans, 2005, pg. 7).

  •  Dynamics of Pedagogy 

As mentioned earlier that, because the learning environment and classroom dynamics are in a constant state of change, teachers are often placed into a position where they need to adapt (Edwards & Edick, 2013). The Teaching Perspectives Inventory (TPI) (Pratt & Collins, 2000) was initially considered, but it was felt that using a scale that focused on the implementation of pedagogical skill rather that the identification of a particular type of pedagogical skill would be more practical in this research. For this reason, a scale was needed that could measure the way in which a teacher integrated a number of elements to their everyday classroom practice. The Technological Pedagogical and Content Knowledge (TPACK) was designed to observe the relationships between a teachers’ ability to integrate technology, pedagogy, and content knowledge into their teaching practice (Koehler & Mishra, 2008).

  •  Need of Psychological Support 

Moving forward with the topic of relationships, interaction, and environment, Maslach (1976) was curious about how individuals working within the human services (dentistry, nursing, teaching, etc.) felt throughout times high emotional arousal and the various coping strategies the individuals employed. Through this research, among others, Maslach (1976) labelled a concept known as ‘burnout’ that caused individuals to feel emotionally exhausted to the point where negative perceptions towards clients, patients, or students, were formed. Later research by Maslach, Jackson, and Leiter (1996) explain burnout further as being a “syndrome of emotional exhaustion, depersonalisation, and reduced personal accomplishment that can occur among individuals who work with people in some capacity”.

  • Conclusion 

In some ways, the importance of the teacher in the classroom is made evident through statements such as “pupils’ positivity towards school is reflective of teachers’ efforts to deliver a broad, balanced and interesting curriculum”. As mentioned earlier in this paper, Pratt (2000) argues that each individual teacher will naturally hold a unique “set of beliefs and intentions that give direction and justification to our actions”, meaning that each individual classroom is a completely unique environment; further developing this ecosystemic perspective and that each school is made up of a series of ecosystems. 

In moving forward with this research, what is now currently known about the educational environment is that nothing is completely certain; the collected data above reveals possible indications of what may be happening on a classroom level. While students have identified liking their teacher more than they like school, possibly indicating that the student places greater emphasis on the student-teacher relationship, it is unclear whether this dynamic extends into secondary school. 

The lack of information and data surrounding the interactions between the students and teachers is interesting from a context, considering the length of time one spends with the other. There is a reported gender imbalance throughout each level of education, with the number of male primary school teachers reducing as seen in the DES statistics and, as suggested by the GUI, a possible difference in teaching strategies and styles in both male and female teachers. It is known that both teachers and principals experience high levels of stress, but also experience high levels of satisfaction. This dynamic of the student-teacher relationship is not made explicitly clear. 

Despite the importance of a teacher preparing lessons that are ‘engaging’, as identified in the WSE, the delivery of this class is dependent on numerous factors. For example, a lesson plan is developed for a class based on what the teacher feels the class is capable of; it states the learning outcomes, how these are measured, what materials are used, or whether the teacher needs to cater for any special educational needs. Because every class is different, if a teacher intends on giving the same lesson to another group, the plan itself will need to be adapted to suit the needs and requirements of the next class. In other words, the teacher needs to understand the students and who they are in order to effectively deliver the content of a lesson; this implies numerous factors that were not addressed in the above datasets. 

Digital pedagogy in various forms is the future of education, requiring adjustments in teaching and learning methodologies. Keeping aligned with the methodological framework of this research, the purpose of this research was to critically review and evaluate pre-existing data, concerning the education environment, with the intention of giving a direction to this research. What the findings of this current study are initially showing is that there is need to explore the dynamics of the relationship between students and their teachers. This desk research has provided three specific research directions which have, to this point, led to more questions than it has answered.

Later, Biswas-Diener and Diener (2006), using a larger sample group of both Indian and American participants (N=183), reported almost identical findings to the previous 2001 study. Similarly, all three groups in this study reported high levels of satisfaction with the ‘self’, which was considered a cultural difference in the previous study. However, while the American samples reported negative levels of subjective well-being and social relationships, the Indian sample reported positive levels of subjective well-being social relationships. Biswas-Diener and Diener (2006) propose that macroeconomic factors, such as the communistic government or high poverty rate, as being a significant contributor to the differences between the samples. If they are the same, as was the case with Biswas-Diener and Diener (2001; 2006) great; if not, an analysis of population differences will most likely uncover a new way to view the phenomena under study.

REFERENCE:

  1. Baker, M. (2013). Industrial actions in schools: strikes and student achievement. Canadian Journal of Economics/Revue canadienne d’économique46(3), 1014-1036.
  2. Wills, G. (2014). The Effects of Teacher Strike Activity on Student Learning in South African Primary Schools. Economic Research Southern Africa working paper.
  3. Mittal, S. (2015). Evaluating the benefits of E-learning Systems as perceived by School Teachers in India: An SEM approach. BVIMR Management Edge8(1).
  4. Biswas-Diener, R., & Diener, E. (2001). Making the best of a bad situation: Satisfaction in the slums of Calcutta. Social Indicators Research, 55, 329-352. 
  5. Biswas-Diener, R., & Diener, E. (2006). Subjective well-being of the homeless, and lessons for happiness. Social Indicators Research. 76, 185-205.
  6. Breeman, L. D., Wubbels, T., van Lier, P. A. C., Verhulst, F. C., Van der Ende, J., Maras, A., & Tick, N. T. (2015). Teacher characteristics, social classroom relationships, and children’s social, emotional, and behavioural classroom adjustment in special education. Journal of school psychology53(1), 87-103.
  7. Watzlawick, P., Beavin, J. H., & Jackson, D. (1967). The Pragmatics of Human Communication. New York: Norton.
  8. Edwards, S. & Edick, N.A. (2013). Culturally responsive teaching for significant relationships. Journal of Praxis in Multicultural Education7(1), 4.
  9. Pratt, D. D., & Collins, J. B. (2000). The teaching perspectives inventory (TPI). Adult Education Research Conference (Paper 68). Retrieved 16/6/2015 from http://newprairiepress.org/aerc/2000/papers/68/
  10. Koehler, M. J., & Mishra, P. (2008). Introducing tpck. Handbook of technological pedagogical content knowledge (TPCK) for educators, 3-29.
  11. Maslach, C. (1976). Burned-out. Journal of Human Behaviour, (9):16-22.
  12. Maslach, C., Jackson, S.E. and Leiter, M.P. (1996). MBI: The Maslach Burnout Inventory: Manual. Consulting Psychologists Press, Palo Alto, CA.

Link to DOWNLOAD PDF