“Religion and Rationality in Arun Kolatkar’s Poem ‘Jejuri”

Daily writing prompt
What were your parents doing at your age?

Dr. Jahagirdar Zinga Salunkhe

TSS’s Smt. V. U. Patil Arts and Late. Dr. B. S. Desale Science College, Sakri

Tal-Sakri Dist- Dhule (Maharashtra) Pin-Code-424304

Email:-jahagirdar1474@gmail.com

ABSTRACT:

Arun Kolatkar’s Jejuri presents a unique and realistic portrayal of religious experience in modern Indian society by examining the complex relationship between faith and reason. Arun Kolatkar’s Jejuri occupies a significant place in Indian English poetry for its realistic and unconventional treatment of religion and spirituality. The poem Jejuri presents a skeptical and rational view of religious practices through the eyes of a modern pilgrim. Kolatkar depicts the pilgrimage site of Jejuri as a space where devotion coexists with doubt and observation. The poet’s persona neither blindly accepts nor completely rejects religious beliefs; instead, he adopts a balanced perspective that encourages critical reflection.  This paper explores the tension between religion and rationality in Jejuri and examines how Kolatkar questions blind faith while appreciating the cultural significance of religious traditions. The study reveals that Arun Kolatkar does not reject religion completely but advocates a balanced approach that harmonizes faith with reason.The study highlights the continued relevance of poet’s vision in an age increasingly shaped by scientific thinking and modern sensibilities.

This paper analyzes how Kolatkar questions mechanical worship and blind faith while recognizing the cultural and emotional significance of religion. It argues that Jejuri promotes a harmonious relationship between religion and rationality, suggesting that true spirituality lies in awareness, inquiry, and human understanding rather than in rigid rituals.

KEYWORDS: Jejuri, traditions, religion, rationality, pilgrim, faith,rituals,unconventional,skepticism, Lord Khandoba,priests.

INTRODUCTION:

Arun Kolatkar (1932–2004) is one of the most prominent figures in modern Indian English poetry. His collection Jejuri (1976) won the Commonwealth Poetry Prize and brought him international recognition. The poem sequence is based on the poet’s visit to Jejuri, a small pilgrimage town in Maharashtra, dedicated to Lord Khandoba. Through a series of short poems, Arun Kolatkar presents his observations of temples, priests, pilgrims, and rituals.Unlike conventional religious poetry that glorifies faith. He presents religion as a lived experience rather than an idealized concept. The poet’s persona in Jejuri is neither a devoted believer nor an outright atheist. Instead, he represents the modern, rational individual who questions traditional beliefs while participating in religious practices.

CONCEPT OF RELIGION AND RATIONALITY:

Religion has traditionally been associated with faith, devotion, and unquestioned belief in divine power. In Indian culture, pilgrimage is seen as a sacred act that strengthens spiritual consciousness. Rationality, on the other hand, emphasizes logic, observation, and critical thinking. A rational individual seeks evidence and clarity rather than accepting beliefs blindly.

In Jejuri, Arun Kolatkar juxtaposes these two forces. The sacred environment of temples and rituals is constantly examined through a rational lens. The poet does not deny the existence of spiritual longing but questions whether religious practices truly fulfill this need. This conflict between belief and reason forms the central theme of Jejuri.

PORTRAYAL OF RELIGION IN JEJURI:

ArunKolatkar presents religion in Jejuri as a mixture of devotion, superstition, and routine. The temples appear old, broken, and neglected, symbolizing the decline of spiritual vitality. In the poem “The Bus,” the journey to Jejuri is depicted in a casual and almost humorous manner, reducing the solemnity usually associated with pilgrimage.

In “The Priest,” the priest is portrayed as mechanically performing rituals without genuine spiritual involvement. His actions appear more professional than devotional. Similarly, in “An Old Woman,” the blind beggar woman symbolizes blind faith. Though physically blind, she possesses unwavering devotion. The poet admires her sincerity but also views her belief with skepticism. This reflects Kolatkar’s balanced attitude toward faith.

RATIONAL OUTLOOK OF THE POET:

The poet’s rationality is evident in his constant questioning and observation. He does not accept religious symbols at face value. In “The Doorstep,” he describes broken stones and discarded idols, suggesting the fragility of religious structures. The sacred is reduced to ordinary material objects.In “Yeshwant Rao,” the poet meets a man who claims to have supernatural powers. Instead of believing him, the poet responds with irony and doubt. This reflects the rational mind that refuses to accept miraculous claims without proof.Kolatkar also uses precise and simple language to maintain an objective tone. His imagery is concrete and realistic, avoiding exaggerated spiritual expressions. This stylistic choice strengthens the rational perspective of the poem.

THE DECLINE OF SACRED AWE:

One of the central concerns of Jejuri is the diminution of the sacred in the face of modern realities. “The roofs are leaking, & the gods are old.”This opening line immediately sets the tone of temporal decay. The temples, once places of awe and wonder, now show signs of neglect. Kolatkar’s god is not timeless; he is aged, almost vulnerable.

The poet’s observation of the landscape intensifies this sense:“The bitter taste of the sun is in the stones.”Here, the natural world around the temple feels harsh and uninviting, as if spirituality itself has been eroded by time and environment.

USE OF IRONY AND SATIRE:

Irony is one of the most powerful tools. Arun Kolatkar uses to expose the gap between religious ideals and actual practice. Many scenes in Jejuri appear humorous but carry serious implications.For example, in “The Bus,” the casual behavior of pilgrims contrasts sharply with the supposed sanctity of the journey. In “Makarand,” the worship of a deity is presented in a manner that highlights human absurdity.Through satire, Arun Kolatkar criticizes blind devotion, hypocrisy, and empty rituals. However, his satire is gentle rather than harsh. He does not insult believers but encourages them to reflect critically on their faith.

Arun Kolatkar’s voice often leans toward irony a technique that allows him to present religious ritual devoid of idealization.“The morning after the festival the village is strewn with coconuts and flowers.”

This image situates the sacred celebration within a very human reality: waste and debris. The aftermath of religious fervor is not transcendental clarity but a messy, littered terrain.Another striking line reveals the poet’s complex attitude toward worship:“Come back next year, Khandoba said.”Here, the anthropomorphized god appears almost bureaucratic, signaling a routine rather than a miraculous intervention.

RELIGION AS CULTURAL EXPERIENCE:

Despite his rational approach, Arun Kolatkar does not dismiss religion completely. He recognizes its cultural and emotional importance. Jejuri is presented as a living space where religion, poverty, history, and human struggle coexist.The poet participates in rituals, observes festivals, and interacts with pilgrims. This shows his involvement with the religious environment. His skepticism does not isolate him from the community. Instead, it allows him to experience religion more honestly.Thus, religion in Jejuri is not merely a spiritual practice but also a social and cultural phenomenon.

RECONCILIATION OF FAITH AND REASON:

One of the most significant aspects of Jejuri is its attempt to reconcile faith and reason. Arun Kolatkar does not advocate complete rejection of religion. Nor does he promote blind belief. He suggests a middle path where faith is guided by intelligence and awareness.The poet respects human devotion but rejects superstition. He values spiritual curiosity but opposes mechanical rituals. This balanced perspective reflects the mindset of modern individuals who seek meaning without abandoning rational thinking.Through this approach, Jejuri becomes a philosophical exploration of belief in the contemporary world.

CONCLUSION:

Arun Kolatkar’s poem Jejuri presents a profound examination of religion and rationality in modern Indian society. By portraying religious practices through a skeptical yet sympathetic lens, the poet challenges blind faith and promotes critical awareness. His use of irony, realistic imagery, and detached narration highlights the tension between tradition and modernity. Through his keen observation and subtle irony, Kolatkar portrays a landscape where faith, tradition, and skepticism coexist in constant tension. Rather than glorifying blind devotion or dismissing belief altogether, the poet adopts a balanced and critical perspective that encourages thoughtful reflection.

Arun Kolatkar neither glorifies nor condemns religion. Instead, he invites readers to reflect on their own beliefs and practices. Jejuri ultimately suggests that true spirituality lies not in rigid rituals but in honest inquiry and human understanding. The poem remains relevant today as it addresses the universal conflict between faith and reason in an increasingly rational world.Arun Kolatkar’s depiction of decaying temples, mechanical rituals, and indifferent priests symbolizes the erosion of unquestioned religious authority in a modern, rational world. At the same time, he acknowledges the emotional and cultural significance of faith in human life. The speaker’s detached yet curious attitude reflects the modern individual’s struggle to reconcile inherited beliefs with logical reasoning and personal experience.

By blending realistic imagery with philosophical insight, Jejuri questions conventional notions of holiness and challenges readers to reconsider the true essence of spirituality. The poem suggests that genuine faith does not lie in rigid practices or superstitions but in self-awareness, moral integrity, and intellectual honesty. Rational inquiry, therefore, becomes not an enemy of religion but a means to deepen understanding.

In conclusion, Jejuri stands as a significant literary work that bridges tradition and modernity, belief and doubt, emotion and reason. Arun Kolatkar successfully highlights the need for a harmonious coexistence between religion and rationality in a rapidly changing world. His poetic vision urges readers to move beyond superficial religiosity and embrace a more reflective, humane, and enlightened approach to spirituality.

REFERENCES

  1. Kolatkar, Arun. Jejuri. Bombay: Clearing House, 1976.
  2. Naik, M. K. A History of Indian English Literature. Sahitya Akademi, 1982.
  3. Parthasarathy, R. Ten Twentieth-Century Indian Poets. Oxford University Press, 1976.
  4. King, Bruce. Modern Indian Poetry in English. Oxford University Press, 1987.
  5. Mehrotra, Arvind Krishna. A History of Indian Literature in English. Columbia University Press, 2003.

When Wisdom Transforms: Why Ekaterina Fakhrutdinova Doesn’t ‘Treat’ but Helps Restore

Author: Amanda Gram Published: 28th August 2025

When a crisis is not a sentence but a turning point. And how God speaks through honest conversations.

In today’s world, we often encounter two opposing camps: some say “only faith heals,” while others insist that “only scientific psychology works.”

Ekaterina Fakhrutdinova – a Christian family counselor, soul-care practitioner, certified BMHC Mental Health Coach, member of the Association for Cognitive Behavioral Therapists, leader of a family ministry, and member of the American Association of Christian Counselors (AACC) – breaks this myth. She shows that there is no conflict between soul care and science if the focus remains on the person, their pain, and their hope.

Not fearing pain – that is maturity.
When families come to Ekaterina after betrayal, when women bring wounds, teenagers bring anxiety, or pastors come with burnout, she does not look for someone to blame. She listens. She hears. And she gently walks alongside. Not from the position of “I know what’s right,” but as someone who has walked the path, who knows how to be present, and who helps people hear themselves.

Her method – the fruit of 14 years of practice, numerous supervisions, scientific research, and prayer – is built on Aaron Beck’s cognitive-behavioral therapy, Viktor Frankl’s logotherapy, and Jay Adams’ biblical counseling. The method does more than work – it reveals.

“Faith is not a form. It’s when you, even in tears, are not afraid to be real before God. And psychology is not control, but a tool that makes the journey clearer.”

What Ekaterina offers is a unique kind of spiritual care for mental health, where a person receives support in difficult life circumstances. The method helps navigate complex situations when one cannot understand what is happening inside.

It transforms loneliness into the valuable resource of solitude, and chaos into awareness.

Family pain is not the end. It is an invitation to healing.
Many couples come to Ekaterina at their hardest moment: after betrayal, abortion, frozen intimacy, or decades of silence. And it is precisely in these situations that her mission becomes clear: to create space for restoration.

The project “From Heart to Heart” has become not just the title of her book, but a true method of accompaniment, where psychological help is grounded in spiritual foundations. Here, words like “prayer,” “sin,” “forgiveness,” and “trauma” are not feared – because it is honesty that restores relationships.

“If a family has at least one living link – faith, empathy, principles, values, or the desire to understand – then there is something to work with.”

Who is this path for?
Ekaterina Fakhrutdinova helps:

  • Christian families who don’t want to destroy, but don’t know how to preserve;
  • Young people afraid of repeating their parents’ mistakes;
  • Parents of children with special needs who are exhausted from holding on;
  • Pastors, ministry leaders, and missionaries who have no safe place to be weak;
  • Those who have left, lost, grown old, “given up,” despaired – yet still want to believe again.

Not a psychologist for everyone. But a guide for those who want to keep moving forward.
Ekaterina is a true companion for those ready not only to be heard, but also to listen – to themselves, to God, to others.

Her style is not about imposing, but supporting. Not about diagnosis, but dialogue. Not about quoting a book, but about living through a story.

The result?
Faith becomes alive.
Family becomes possible.
And pain is not the end – but the entry point to healing.

Science and God

“Science” and “God”, the two words which are often seen as separate entities. These words seem conflicting to most of us and are often a topic of debate. Science seems to question the existence of God and believers of God often question why we are unable to explain the entire universe completely by science till date, a question on the success of science. We can often come across debates on televisions, radio, magazines, etc where people try to prove one as superior over the other. But, are they really two different things? Are they conflicting terms? Or are they same?

A deeper thought over it can clear our confusion. If we deep dig, we find that indeed both are connected. We really don’t need to choose between them. Science and God, are superior powers. The differences arise when we start associating God with some particular religion and Science with the only education. In reality, science is the process of thinking God’s thought after him. “An equation is really nothing unless it expresses a thought of God”, according to Ramanujan. They both actually merge at the spiritual level.

When we talk of science, it is the theories, the fundamental laws that very well explains the nature around us. It offers an explanation of all the natural phenomena in a very beautiful way and at a very basic level. It helped us understand how to converse in the language of nature, i.e in mathematics. It gives human power. The more we as humans understand science, the more powerful we become. Visit the days when humans started to understand science to get to know about the secrets of nature, the things they imagined then are now a reality. The gadgets they considered as their dreams are now in our hands. The technology we imagine today will also become a reality pretty soon. Science gave a power to humans to achieve the impossible.

God, on the other hand, is another superiority. There has been no proper evidence of someone seeing a God. We have not seen God, but we all believe in a “power” that is superior to all of us and many refer to this superior power as “God”. God gives humans the strength and power by making us understand the language of love and humanity. Spirituality is the heart of a human being and through God, we reach here. God helps us understand our potential and make us believe in our strengths. It changes our perception and makes the world a very beautiful and peaceful place for us. The world is incomplete without God.

We can thus conclude,  that both Science and God are a source of immense power to human beings and both are tied together. Both speak the same language. The more faith we develop in God, the more we get close to science, the more we understand science, our belief in the existence of God becomes stronger. Louis Pasteur rightly said that “a bit of science can distance us from God, but more of it nears one to him”, and that is for sure. Diving deep into them will give us immense power and peace.

DEVOTION SEES NO RELIGION

“Ahe Nila saila Prabala Mata barana mo Arata Nalini banaku Kala dalana Ahe Nila saila”. Nestled on the eastern coast of India neighboring West Bengal lies Odisha the home to Sri Lord Jagannath. Notable for being one of the Char Dham or four abodes, the grandiose Jagannath temple of Puri for ages has heard the devotional songs sung by many great poets and priests. Drawn by the alluring aura of the Great Lord saints like Chaitanya Mahaprabhu and poets like Salabega have also been mesmerized by it. Just like the sweetness of Kanika bhog which is offered to the lord as Mahaprasad, there is an immense sweetness in this story of love and devotion of Salabega. Salabega was the son of the Mughal subedar, Lalbeg, and a young Hindu Brahmin widow who was a devotee of Lord Jagannath, who lived in the first half of the 17th century. As soon as he was sufficiently old, SalaBega took up fighting in his father’s campaigns. It so happened that, in the war where Lalbeg died, SalaBega got badly injured and was battling for life. His mother prayed to her beloved Lord Jagannath for her dear son’s life and her prayers were answered. SalaBega was cured miraculously. His mother told him then that Lord Jagannath was an incarnation of Vishnu, the creator of the universe. This incident made SalaBega convinced about the healing essence of the Lord, thus he ended up becoming Lord Jagannath’s devotee. Feeling greatly indebted to Lord Jagannath, he went to Puri to see Lord Jagannath. However, due to the custom of not allowing non-Hindus to enter the temple, the priests didn’t allow SalaBega to enter the temple. SalaBega didn’t fight or opposed them. He waited for the annual Chariot festival, the Rath Yatra where Lord Jagannath, Goddess Subhadra, and Lord Balabhadra are brought out onto the Bada Danda and travel to the Shri Gundicha Temple, to their maternal aunt’s temple, in huge chariots allowing the public to have darsana. They stay there for nine days and travel back to the Shree Mandira. So every year he kept a watch for the chariot, he built a small hut on that road which is the Mazar now. During the rest of the year, he kept visiting religious places. On a particular year, he got delayed in coming back to his hut from Vrindavana, as on the way he suddenly fell ill. Feeling helpless and realizing that he would not reach Puri in time to see the Ratha yatra festival, he offered prayers to Lord Jagannath pleading him to wait until he arrived at the Rath Yatra. An anxious SalaBega cried out to Lord Jagannath and had a dream in which the Lord promised him that He would wait for him. So when the Nandighosha or the chariot of Lord Jagannath reached near the hut of SalaBega, it refused to move even an inch. People tried to pull it hard but nothing happened. They even got elephants to push the Nandighosha but SalaBega’s utter devotion to the Lord kept the Chariot glued to that exact spot for seven days. By then, the King of Puri and all priests were worried. The head priest got a dream telling him not to worry as the Lord was waiting for his favorite kid. So for 7 days, all rituals of Lord Jagannath, all pujas were done on the Chariot itself. SalaBega came at last. This time, nobody stopped him from going closer to the Lord. He went and had his darshan, and worshipped the Lords. Now it is ritualistic for the Lord’s chariot to stop near his Samadhi every year during Rath Yatra. The Lord’s benevolence is not restricted to just one religion, he sees everyone as his children.
Recently before the commencement of the rath yatra this year, the Supreme court of India passed an order canceling the Rath Yatra citing the growing concern of the pandemic as the reason for which 21 persons moved the court seeking recall of its order staying the historic Lord Jagannath Rath Yatra. Among them was Aftab Hossan, a 19-year-old Muslim student from Odisha’s Nayagarh district. Hossen has said his grandfather had constructed a Trinath (Brahma, Vishnu, and Maheshwar) temple at Itamati in 1960. He said that he has also read several books on Lord Jagannath and developed devotion towards the ‘Lord of the Universe’. This instance shows that faith breaks all the boundaries created by religion uniting people. Continue reading “DEVOTION SEES NO RELIGION”