Tag: Writing

Work Motivation of University Lecturers: A Narrative Review and Policy-Oriented Synthesis

Daily writing prompt
What books do you want to read?
View all responses

Hiếu, P. T. (2026). Work Motivation of University Lecturers: A Narrative Review and Policy-Oriented Synthesis. International Journal of Research, 13(1), 494–507. https://doi.org/10.26643/ijr/2026/24

Phí Thị Hiếu

Associate Professor, Thai Nguyen University of Education, Thai Nguyen, Vietnam

Abstract

This article presents a narrative review of selected literature on work motivation among university lecturers, aiming to synthesize key theoretical perspectives and recurring empirical themes. Drawing on established motivational frameworks, particularly self-determination theory and two-factor theory, the review examines how intrinsic and extrinsic factors interact to influence lecturers’ engagement, job satisfaction, and organizational commitment.

The reviewed literature suggests that intrinsic motivation is frequently identified as an important factor in sustaining lecturers’ long-term engagement and professional dedication. These intrinsic factors are strongly supported by autonomy, perceived competence, collegial relationships, and opportunities for meaningful teaching and research. At the same time, extrinsic conditions, including salary, workload, promotion systems, and employment stability, function as essential foundational factors that shape lecturers’ overall job satisfaction and retention, even if they do not directly generate intrinsic motivation.

The review further highlights the importance of organizational culture, leadership practices, and governance structures in shaping motivational experiences. Several studies suggest that managerialist and performance-driven environments may, in some contexts, be associated with reduced perceptions of autonomy and intrinsic motivation among lecturers. In addition, contemporary higher education reforms emphasizing accountability and performance metrics are shown to have mixed motivational effects, depending on how they are implemented and perceived by academic staff. Overall, the review underscores that lecturers’ work motivation is a multidimensional and context-dependent phenomenon with significant implications for teaching quality, research productivity, and the sustainability of higher education systems. The reviewed literature points to the potential value of higher education policies that take lecturers’ psychological needs into account when designing governance and evaluation mechanisms.

Keywords

Work motivation, academic motivation, university lecturers, higher education

Introduction

Work motivation of university lecturers has been widely recognized as a critical factor influencing the quality of higher education, institutional effectiveness, and the sustainable development of academic systems worldwide. University lecturers play a central role not only in teaching and research but also in curriculum development, academic governance, and community engagement. As higher education systems face increasing pressures related to globalization, digital transformation, accountability, and performance-based evaluation, understanding the factors that motivate lecturers to perform effectively has become an important concern for researchers, educational leaders, and policymakers.

In the context of higher education, work motivation refers to the internal and external forces that initiate, direct, and sustain lecturers’ professional behaviors, including teaching commitment, research productivity, innovation, and engagement with institutional goals. Motivated lecturers are more likely to demonstrate higher levels of job satisfaction, instructional quality, and professional dedication, which in turn positively affect student learning outcomes and institutional reputation. Conversely, low levels of work motivation among academic staff may lead to reduced teaching effectiveness, diminished research output, burnout, and higher turnover intentions.

The literature on work motivation of university lecturers draws on established motivational theories such as Maslow’s hierarchy of needs, Herzberg’s two-factor theory, self-determination theory, and expectancy–value theory. These theoretical frameworks have been used to explain how intrinsic factors (e.g., passion for teaching, academic autonomy, professional growth) and extrinsic factors (e.g., salary, promotion opportunities, working conditions, leadership support) interact to shape lecturers’ motivational orientations. In academic settings, intrinsic motivation is often emphasized due to the intellectual and autonomous nature of academic work, yet extrinsic conditions remain crucial for sustaining long-term commitment and performance.

A growing body of empirical studies across different national contexts has explored how lecturers’ work motivation may be influenced by a combination of individual, organizational, and contextual factors. These include institutional policies, workload distribution, research support, evaluation systems, leadership styles, collegial relationships, and opportunities for professional development. In recent years, changes in higher education governance—such as increased performance measurement, publication pressure, and competition for research funding—have significantly reshaped lecturers’ motivational experiences. While some lecturers may feel motivated by clear performance incentives and recognition, others may experience increased stress and reduced autonomy.

In developing and transitional higher education contexts, including Vietnam and other Southeast Asian countries, research has highlighted additional challenges related to limited resources, heavy teaching loads, and disparities in career advancement opportunities. These contextual factors may intensify the importance of supportive leadership, fair evaluation systems, and meaningful professional development in sustaining lecturers’ motivation. However, despite a growing body of research, existing findings remain fragmented, and systematic syntheses focusing specifically on university lecturers’ work motivation are still limited.

Therefore, a comprehensive literature review on the work motivation of university lecturers is necessary to consolidate existing evidence, identify dominant research themes, and clarify theoretical and empirical trends in this field. By synthesizing prior studies, such a review can contribute to a deeper understanding of how motivational factors operate within higher education and provide valuable insights for institutional policy and academic management. Ultimately, enhancing lecturers’ work motivation is essential for improving educational quality, fostering innovation, and ensuring the long-term sustainability of higher education institutions.

Materials and Methods

This study employed a narrative literature review approach to critically synthesize influential theoretical and empirical studies relevant to lecturers’ work motivation. The literature was collected primarily from peer-reviewed academic journals, scholarly books, and reputable academic reports focusing on higher education, educational psychology, and human resource management in academic settings. The review included both international and regional studies, with particular attention to empirical research and theoretical frameworks addressing intrinsic and extrinsic motivation, job satisfaction, organizational commitment, and professional engagement among university lecturers.

The selection of literature was guided by the following inclusion criteria: (1) studies explicitly examining work motivation, job motivation, or closely related constructs such as job satisfaction and organizational commitment among university or college lecturers; (2) research grounded in established motivational theories, including self-determination theory and two-factor theory; (3) studies conducted in higher education contexts; and (4) publications considered relevant to contemporary higher education systems and policy environments. Both qualitative and quantitative studies were included to capture a broad range of methodological perspectives.

After the identification and screening process, the selected publications were analyzed using a thematic synthesis approach. The analysis focused on identifying recurring themes and patterns related to motivational factors influencing university lecturers. Specifically, the findings were organized around key thematic dimensions, including intrinsic motivational factors such as professional autonomy and academic identity, extrinsic motivational factors such as salary, promotion, and working conditions, and institutional and policy-related influences such as leadership practices, performance evaluation systems, and professional development opportunities.

The synthesis process involved comparing findings across studies to identify commonalities and divergences, as well as examining how contextual factors such as national higher education policies and institutional characteristics shape lecturers’ motivation. Through this thematic organization, the review aimed to provide an integrated and evidence-based understanding of work motivation among university lecturers, thereby informing future research directions and policy development in higher education.

 

Research Results

Based on the literature selection criteria and the methodological approach outlined in the Materials and Methods section, the reviewed studies provide a comprehensive and multi-layered picture of work motivation among university lecturers. Across diverse higher education systems and institutional contexts, lecturers’ motivation emerges as a complex construct influenced by individual psychological needs, organizational conditions, and broader policy environments. Drawing primarily on self-determination theory and two-factor theory, the findings are synthesized into interrelated thematic domains that collectively explain how and why lecturers experience varying levels of motivation in their academic work.

 

1. Theoretical grounding of lecturers’ work motivation in higher education research

A dominant characteristic of the reviewed literature is its strong grounding in established motivational theories. Self-determination theory is widely used to conceptualize lecturers’ work motivation as a continuum ranging from intrinsic motivation to different forms of extrinsic motivation. Many studies drawing on self-determination theory emphasize autonomy as a key motivational factor in academic work, although the strength of this relationship appears to vary across institutional contexts. Empirical studies demonstrate that autonomy, understood as control over teaching content, research agendas, and professional decision-making, is a central motivational driver for university lecturers. Research grounded in self-determination theory shows that when lecturers perceive high levels of autonomy, they report stronger intrinsic motivation, higher job satisfaction, and greater commitment to their institutions. Conversely, environments characterized by rigid managerial control or excessive administrative regulation tend to frustrate autonomy needs, resulting in diminished motivation.

Two-factor theory provides a complementary perspective by distinguishing between intrinsic motivators related to the nature of academic work itself and extrinsic or hygiene factors associated with employment conditions. The reviewed studies consistently support Herzberg’s distinction, showing that intrinsic factors such as intellectual challenge, recognition, and opportunities for academic achievement play a crucial role in sustaining long-term motivation. At the same time, inadequate hygiene factors—such as low salary, job insecurity, or heavy workloads—do not necessarily motivate when present but can significantly demotivate when absent.

Qualitative research deepens these theoretical insights by illustrating how lecturers interpret motivation through their professional identities. Interviews and narrative studies reveal that many lecturers view teaching and research not merely as occupational tasks but as vocations aligned with personal values and social responsibilities. These findings reinforce theoretical models that conceptualize academic motivation as value-driven and meaning-oriented rather than purely instrumental.

 

2. Intrinsic motivational factors in academic work

Across the reviewed literature, intrinsic motivation consistently emerges as a central component of lecturers’ engagement and persistence in higher education. Studies examining intrinsic motivation highlight factors such as enjoyment of teaching, intellectual curiosity, commitment to knowledge creation, and satisfaction derived from mentoring students. These intrinsic drivers are frequently identified as more stable and enduring than extrinsic incentives.

Research grounded in self-determination theory demonstrates that intrinsic motivation among lecturers is strongly associated with perceived competence. Lecturers who feel capable of delivering high-quality teaching, conducting meaningful research, and contributing to academic communities report higher levels of motivation and professional fulfillment. Opportunities for professional development, research collaboration, and academic recognition are therefore frequently cited as key conditions supporting intrinsic motivation.

Several qualitative studies further show that intrinsic motivation is closely linked to lecturers’ perceptions of the social value of their work. Lecturers often describe motivation in terms of contributing to student development, advancing societal knowledge, or addressing local and global challenges. This sense of purpose reinforces sustained engagement, even in contexts where extrinsic rewards are limited.

However, the literature also indicates that intrinsic motivation is vulnerable to erosion when institutional conditions undermine autonomy or overload lecturers with administrative tasks. Studies report that increasing bureaucratic demands and performance pressures can reduce the time and energy available for intrinsically rewarding activities such as teaching innovation and research, thereby weakening motivation over time.

 

3. Extrinsic motivational factors, job satisfaction, and organizational commitment

In addition to intrinsic factors, extrinsic motivators play a significant role in shaping lecturers’ work motivation, particularly through their influence on job satisfaction and organizational commitment. Quantitative studies frequently examine salary, promotion systems, workload distribution, and employment stability as key predictors of motivation-related outcomes.

The reviewed literature indicates that fair and transparent reward systems contribute positively to lecturers’ job satisfaction. While salary alone is rarely identified as a primary motivator, inadequate compensation relative to workload and expectations is consistently associated with dissatisfaction and reduced commitment. Promotion opportunities and recognition of academic achievements are similarly important, particularly for early- and mid-career lecturers seeking career progression.

Organizational commitment emerges as a closely related construct in many studies. Lecturers who perceive institutional support, fairness, and recognition tend to report stronger affective commitment and a greater willingness to invest effort in teaching and research. Conversely, perceptions of inequity, opaque evaluation criteria, or unstable employment conditions are associated with lower commitment and higher turnover intentions.

Importantly, the literature emphasizes that extrinsic factors interact with intrinsic motivation rather than replacing it. Supportive extrinsic conditions can create an environment in which intrinsic motivation flourishes, whereas poor working conditions can undermine even highly motivated lecturers. This interaction aligns with theoretical arguments that motivation in academic work is best understood as a combination of internal drives and external supports.

 

4. Organizational culture, leadership, and institutional governance

A substantial portion of the reviewed studies situates lecturers’ motivation within organizational contexts, highlighting the role of institutional culture, leadership styles, and governance structures. Research consistently demonstrates that collegial and participatory organizational cultures are positively associated with higher levels of motivation and job satisfaction among lecturers.

Studies examining leadership practices find that supportive and transformational leadership styles foster motivation by recognizing academic contributions, encouraging professional autonomy, and facilitating collaboration. Leaders who engage lecturers in decision-making processes contribute to a sense of ownership and shared responsibility, which enhances both intrinsic motivation and organizational commitment.

In contrast, studies report that managerialist governance models emphasizing performance metrics, accountability, and competition may negatively affect lecturers’ motivation. When evaluation systems are perceived as overly quantitative or misaligned with academic values, lecturers often experience increased stress and reduced intrinsic motivation. These findings suggest that governance structures play a critical mediating role between policy demands and individual motivational experiences.

Qualitative evidence further reveals that organizational culture influences how lecturers interpret institutional expectations. In supportive environments, lecturers are more likely to view performance requirements as opportunities for growth, whereas in unsupportive contexts, similar requirements may be perceived as controlling or demotivating.

 

5. Policy environments and systemic influences on lecturers’ motivation

Beyond organizational factors, the reviewed literature highlights the significant impact of national and institutional policy environments on lecturers’ motivation. Higher education reforms related to funding, accountability, and labor markets are frequently examined in relation to academic work motivation.

Studies document that performance-based funding models and publication-driven evaluation systems can alter motivational orientations among lecturers. While some lecturers respond positively to performance incentives, others experience heightened pressure and diminished intrinsic motivation, particularly when evaluation criteria prioritize quantity over quality.

Job insecurity emerges as a recurring theme in policy-related research. Studies focusing on contract-based employment and casualization report negative effects on motivation, job satisfaction, and long-term commitment. Lecturers facing uncertain employment conditions often adopt extrinsically driven motivational strategies focused on short-term survival rather than long-term academic development.

At the same time, policy environments that support academic freedom, stable employment, and investment in professional development are associated with more sustainable motivational patterns. These findings underscore the importance of aligning higher education policies with motivational principles that support both individual well-being and institutional quality.

 

6. Variations in motivation across career stages and institutional contexts

The reviewed studies reveal systematic variations in work motivation across career stages, institutional types, and national contexts. Early-career lecturers often emphasize extrinsic concerns such as job security, mentorship, and promotion opportunities, reflecting their transitional position within academic labor markets.

Mid-career lecturers tend to focus on balancing teaching, research, and service demands, with motivation shaped by workload management and recognition of achievements. Senior academics, in contrast, frequently prioritize autonomy, leadership roles, and opportunities to influence institutional directions.

Cross-institutional comparisons indicate that resource availability and institutional mission significantly shape motivational experiences. Research-intensive universities often provide stronger research-related motivators, while teaching-oriented institutions may emphasize pedagogical engagement. Cross-national studies further show that motivational patterns are influenced by cultural norms, policy stability, and economic conditions.

These variations highlight the importance of contextualized approaches to understanding and supporting lecturers’ motivation rather than relying on one-size-fits-all strategies.

 

7. Consequences of lecturers’ work motivation for individual and institutional outcomes

Finally, the literature consistently documents the consequences of lecturers’ motivation for both individual performance and institutional effectiveness. High levels of motivation are associated with greater teaching quality, research productivity, innovation in pedagogy, and engagement in academic service.

Conversely, low motivation is linked to burnout, emotional exhaustion, and intentions to leave the profession. Several studies suggest that sustained motivational decline can undermine institutional capacity by reducing staff retention and weakening academic communities.

By integrating findings across theoretical frameworks, methodologies, and contexts, the reviewed literature demonstrates that lecturers’ work motivation is a critical mechanism through which organizational practices and policy decisions influence higher education quality.

 

Discussion

The present review highlights that lecturers’ work motivation in higher education is not solely an individual psychological phenomenon but is deeply embedded in institutional practices and policy frameworks. By synthesizing findings across studies grounded in self-determination theory and two-factor theory, this discussion connects each major result theme to implications for higher education policy, governance, and management.

First, the strong theoretical grounding of lecturers’ motivation in self-determination theory and two-factor theory has important policy implications. The consistent emphasis on autonomy, competence, and relatedness suggests that higher education policies should move beyond narrow performance management approaches and explicitly support lecturers’ psychological needs. Policies that increase administrative control, impose rigid accountability mechanisms, or standardize academic work without regard for disciplinary diversity may unintentionally undermine intrinsic motivation. From a policy perspective, this implies that national and institutional frameworks should preserve academic freedom, allow flexibility in teaching and research design, and recognize the professional judgment of lecturers as a core principle of quality assurance in higher education.

Second, the prominence of intrinsic motivational factors such as intellectual engagement, enjoyment of teaching, and commitment to knowledge creation underscores the need for policies that protect the core academic mission. The results indicate that lecturers are most motivated when they can focus on meaningful teaching and research activities rather than excessive administrative tasks. Higher education policies that overload lecturers with reporting requirements or prioritize short-term output indicators risk eroding intrinsic motivation over time. Therefore, policy reforms should aim to streamline administrative processes, reduce unnecessary bureaucratic burdens, and create institutional conditions that allow lecturers to invest time and energy in pedagogically and intellectually rewarding work.

Third, findings related to extrinsic motivational factors, job satisfaction, and organizational commitment highlight the importance of fair and transparent employment policies. While salary and material rewards alone do not guarantee high motivation, inadequate compensation, unclear promotion pathways, and insecure employment conditions consistently undermine lecturers’ commitment. This has direct implications for higher education labor policies, particularly in systems experiencing increasing casualization and contract-based employment. Policies that ensure reasonable workload allocation, transparent evaluation criteria, and stable career pathways are essential not only for staff well-being but also for institutional sustainability and educational quality.

Fourth, the role of organizational culture, leadership, and governance revealed in the results points to the significance of institutional-level policy implementation. Even well-designed national policies may fail to support motivation if institutional leadership adopts overly managerial or control-oriented practices. The reviewed studies suggest that participatory governance, collegial decision-making, and supportive leadership styles are critical for sustaining lecturers’ motivation. From a policy perspective, this implies that leadership development and governance reform should be integral components of higher education policy, with explicit attention to fostering trust, recognition, and professional respect within academic institutions.

Fifth, the influence of broader policy environments on lecturers’ motivation highlights tensions between accountability-driven reforms and academic values. Performance-based funding, publication pressure, and metric-oriented evaluation systems may incentivize productivity but can also generate stress and reduce intrinsic motivation, particularly when quality and context are overlooked. These findings suggest that higher education policies should adopt more balanced evaluation frameworks that combine quantitative indicators with qualitative assessments of teaching, research, and service. Policymakers should be cautious about relying exclusively on competitive performance metrics and consider their long-term motivational and professional consequences.

Sixth, variations in motivation across career stages and institutional contexts indicate that uniform policy solutions are unlikely to be effective. Early-career lecturers, for example, are particularly sensitive to job security and mentorship opportunities, while senior academics value autonomy and opportunities for leadership. Higher education policies should therefore be differentiated and flexible, providing targeted support for different career stages and institutional missions. Such differentiation can help align policy interventions with lecturers’ evolving motivational needs and professional trajectories.

Finally, the documented consequences of lecturers’ motivation for teaching quality, research productivity, and staff retention emphasize the strategic importance of motivation as a policy concern. Low motivation and burnout are not merely individual problems but systemic risks that can undermine institutional capacity and educational outcomes. From a policy standpoint, investing in supportive working conditions, professional development, and psychologically informed management practices should be viewed as long-term investments in higher education quality rather than short-term costs.

Overall, this discussion reinforces the idea that lecturers’ work motivation is a critical link between higher education policy and educational outcomes. Policies that align with established motivational theories and respect the professional nature of academic work are more likely to foster sustained engagement, innovation, and commitment among university lecturers. Conversely, policies that neglect psychological and organizational dimensions of motivation risk weakening the very human resources on which higher education systems depend.

 

Conclusion and Policy Implications

Conclusion

This review highlights lecturers’ work motivation as an important analytical lens for understanding how organizational practices and policy environments may influence academic engagement and institutional outcomes.

Overall, the reviewed literature indicates that intrinsic motivation—such as enjoyment of teaching, intellectual fulfillment, and commitment to academic values—plays a central role in sustaining lecturers’ engagement and professional dedication. These intrinsic factors are strongly influenced by lecturers’ perceptions of autonomy, competence, and relatedness, as well as by opportunities for meaningful teaching, research, and academic contribution. At the same time, extrinsic factors, including salary, promotion systems, workload, and employment stability, remain essential baseline conditions. While these factors may not directly generate high levels of intrinsic motivation, their absence consistently undermines job satisfaction, organizational commitment, and long-term retention.

The review also highlights the critical role of organizational culture and leadership in shaping lecturers’ motivational experiences. Supportive leadership, participatory governance, and collegial decision-making are associated with higher motivation and stronger professional commitment, whereas overly managerial, metric-driven, or control-oriented environments tend to weaken intrinsic motivation and increase stress and disengagement. These findings underscore that lecturers’ motivation cannot be understood or addressed in isolation from broader institutional practices and governance structures.

Furthermore, the reviewed studies suggest that contemporary higher education reforms—particularly those emphasizing accountability, performance measurement, and competition—have ambiguous effects on lecturers’ motivation. While such reforms may enhance productivity in the short term, they risk narrowing academic work, intensifying pressure, and diminishing intrinsic motivation if not carefully balanced with academic values and professional autonomy. The evidence also indicates that motivational needs vary across career stages and institutional contexts, suggesting that uniform policy approaches are unlikely to be effective.

Taken together, the findings confirm that lecturers’ work motivation is not merely an individual concern but a systemic issue with direct implications for teaching quality, research productivity, institutional stability, and the overall effectiveness of higher education systems.

 

Policy Implications

The findings of this review have several important implications for higher education policy and institutional practice.

First, higher education policies should explicitly recognize lecturers’ motivation as a central component of educational quality and institutional sustainability. Policymakers should move beyond narrowly defined performance indicators and incorporate psychological and organizational dimensions into policy design. This includes protecting academic autonomy, supporting intellectual freedom, and ensuring that accountability mechanisms do not undermine intrinsic motivation.

Second, employment and human resource policies in higher education should prioritize fairness, transparency, and stability. Clear promotion criteria, reasonable workload allocation, and secure career pathways are essential for sustaining lecturers’ job satisfaction and organizational commitment. In contexts where short-term contracts and performance-based employment are expanding, policymakers should carefully assess the long-term motivational and professional consequences of such practices.

Third, institutional governance and leadership development should be a policy priority. Universities should be encouraged to adopt participatory governance models that involve lecturers in decision-making processes affecting teaching, research, and working conditions. Leadership training programs should emphasize supportive, trust-based management approaches that align institutional goals with lecturers’ professional values.

Fourth, policy frameworks should support differentiated and flexible approaches to motivation across career stages. Early-career lecturers may benefit from mentorship, job security, and clear developmental pathways, while mid- and late-career academics may value autonomy, recognition, and leadership opportunities. Policies that acknowledge these differences are more likely to foster sustained motivation across the academic lifespan.

Finally, future higher education policies should adopt a long-term perspective on academic work. Investing in lecturers’ motivation—through supportive working environments, professional development opportunities, and psychologically informed management practices—should be viewed as a strategic investment rather than a cost. Such investments are essential for maintaining high-quality teaching, advancing research, and ensuring the resilience and adaptability of higher education systems in an increasingly complex policy environment.

In conclusion, this review underscores that effective higher education policy must be grounded not only in structural and economic considerations but also in a deep understanding of lecturers’ motivational processes. Aligning policy design with established motivational theories and empirical evidence offers a pathway to strengthening academic engagement, institutional effectiveness, and the long-term sustainability of higher education.

References

1. Barkhuizen, N., Rothmann, S., & van de Vijver, F. J. R. (2014). Burnout and work engagement of academics in higher education institutions: Effects of dispositional optimism. Stress and Health, 30(4), 322–332. https://doi.org/10.1002/smi.2520

2.  Bennett, A. A., Beehr, T. A., & Lepisto, L. R. (2017). A longitudinal study of work after retirement: Examining predictors of bridge employment, continued employment, and retirement satisfaction. Work, Aging and Retirement, 3(1), 16–31. https://doi.org/10.1093/workar/waw019

3. Deci, E. L., & Ryan, R. M. (2000). The “what” and “why” of goal pursuits: Human needs and the self-determination of behavior. Psychological Inquiry, 11(4), 227–268. https://doi.org/10.1207/S15327965PLI1104_01

4.  Deci, E. L., Olafsen, A. H., & Ryan, R. M. (2017). Self-determination theory in work organizations: The state of a science. Annual Review of Organizational Psychology and Organizational Behavior, 4, 19–43. https://doi.org/10.1146/annurev-orgpsych-032516-113108

5.  Franco-Santos, M., Lucianetti, L., & Bourne, M. (2012). Contemporary performance measurement systems: A review of their consequences and a framework for research. Management Accounting Research, 23(2), 79–119. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.mar.2012.04.001

6.  Huyghe, A., & Knockaert, M. (2015). The influence of organizational culture and climate on entrepreneurial orientation among research scientists. Journal of Technology Transfer, 40(1), 138–160. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10961-013-9323-3

7. Kinman, G., & Wray, S. (2018). Work-related wellbeing in UK higher education: A benchmark study. Higher Education, 77(2), 357–375. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10734-018-0268-7

8.  Nguyễn, T. H., & Trần, V. Q. (2023). Động lực làm việc của giảng viên đại học trong bối cảnh đổi mới giáo dục đại học ở Việt Nam. Tạp chí Giáo dục, 23(21), 12–17.

9. OECD. (2021). Building a high-quality teaching profession: Lessons from around the world. OECD Publishing. https://doi.org/10.1787/9789264444161-en

10. Ryan, R. M., & Deci, E. L. (2020). Intrinsic and extrinsic motivation from a self-determination theory perspective: Definitions, theory, practices, and future directions. Routledge.

11. Shin, J. C., & Jung, J. (2014). Academics job satisfaction and job stress across countries in the changing academic environments. Higher Education, 67(5), 603–620. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10734-013-9668-y

12. Teelken, C. (2012). Compliance or pragmatism: How do academics deal with managerialism in higher education? A comparative study in three countries. Studies in Higher Education, 37(3), 271–290. https://doi.org/10.1080/03075079.2010.511171

13. Tremblay, M. A., Blanchard, C. M., Taylor, S., Pelletier, L. G., & Villeneuve, M. (2009). Work extrinsic and intrinsic motivation scale: Its value for organizational psychology research. Canadian Journal of Behavioural Science, 41(4), 213–226. https://doi.org/10.1037/a0015167

14. Tuchman, G. (2009). Wannabe U: Inside the corporate university. University of Chicago Press.

15. Van den Broeck, A., Ferris, D. L., Chang, C.-H., & Rosen, C. C. (2016). A review of self-determination theory’s basic psychological needs at work. Journal of Management, 42(5), 1195–1229. https://doi.org/10.1177/0149206316632058

16. Winter, R., Taylor, T., & Sarros, J. (2000). Trouble at mill: Quality of academic worklife issues within a comprehensive Australian university. Studies in Higher Education, 25(3), 279–294. https://doi.org/10.1080/713696156

The influence of body geometry on the composition of visual-corrective tattooing

Roman Zao (Zakharchenko)
Artist, tattoo artist, researcher in visual culture
Judge of international tattoo conventions
Author of scholarly and research publications in tattoo art and body art
United States
EMAIL: Roman.Zao.ink@gmail.com  
ORCID: 0009-0003-5561-6339

 UDC 7.036:391.91

Publication Date: 14 January 2026
Keywords: visual-corrective tattooing, body geometry, composition, body art, anatomy, visual perception, spatial correction, practice-based research

In contemporary tattoo practice, the visual-corrective function of imagery has become increasingly significant. Within this context, tattooing is considered not only as a decorative or symbolic element, but also as a tool for visual transformation of bodily form. Compositional decisions in tattoo art can enhance, soften, or reinterpret the geometry of the human body, making bodily structure a key factor in artistic choice.

Body geometry comprises a set of proportions, directions, curvatures, rhythms, and visual accents shaped by the anatomical structure of a specific body. Visual perception of the human figure is based not on objective anatomical parameters, but on their optical interpretation. In this context, tattooing may function as a visual-corrective instrument, working with the perception of form, direction, and balance.

Visual-corrective tattooing involves a conscious approach to line, scale, compositional direction, and rhythmic structure. Artistic decisions are developed with consideration of the body’s vertical, horizontal, and diagonal axes, as well as zones of visual tension and relaxation. Composition may reinforce verticality, soften abrupt transitions of form, balance asymmetry, or deliberately accentuate particular bodily features.

Practice-based analysis demonstrates that line is one of the key instruments of visual correction. Vertically oriented elements visually elongate the form; diagonal lines introduce dynamics and a sense of movement; horizontal structures may stabilize composition, yet if applied incorrectly, they can visually weigh down the figure. Thus, the directional choice of line within tattoo composition directly affects the optical perception of body geometry.

Scale is another significant factor. Large-scale compositions enable redistribution of visual emphasis and the formation of a new bodily rhythm, whereas fragmented solutions operate locally, correcting specific areas. Visual-corrective tattooing cannot be universal in application; its effectiveness depends on precise alignment between composition and the individual bodily structure.

Equally important is the interaction between tattoo imagery and the body’s natural curves and curvature. Placement that ignores curvilinear surfaces results in proportional distortion and diminished visual coherence. Conversely, integrating composition into bodily curvature achieves organic fusion, in which the tattoo is perceived as a continuation of the body rather than an applied surface element.

To systematize visual-corrective factors and their influence on compositional decision-making, the following analytical table is presented.

Table 1. Body Geometry Influence on Visual-Corrective Tattoo Composition

Body geometry factorVisual perception issueCorrective compositional approachExpected visual effect
Vertical imbalanceCompressed silhouetteVertical line dominanceElongated body perception
AsymmetryVisual instabilityDirectional flow alignmentBalanced visual structure
Excess curvatureDistorted proportionsAdaptive curvature mappingHarmonized form perception
Volume concentrationVisual heavinessScale redistributionVisual lightness
Irregular surfaceFragmented perceptionModular compositionVisual coherence

For more precise analysis of visual-corrective tattooing, the following system of notational markers is applied within the study.

Notation system (used in analytical observation)
V-axis — dominant vertical orientation of composition
H-axis — dominant horizontal orientation
D-axis — diagonal compositional direction
C-curve — curvature alignment with body surface
S-scale — relative scale of tattoo composition
F-flow — directional visual flow of elements

This notation system allows for documentation and comparison of compositional solutions across different cases, revealing correlations between body geometry and the visual effect of tattooing.

Analysis of accumulated practical and research material indicates that visual-corrective tattooing constitutes a complex form of spatial design in which artistic decision-making extends beyond imagery itself. In this context, the tattoo artist functions not only as a creator of visual form, but also as an interpreter of bodily structure, working with perception and optical transformation.

Thus, the influence of body geometry on the composition of visual-corrective tattooing is systemic in nature. Conscious integration of anatomical and geometric factors enables tattooing to be understood as an instrument of visual body modeling situated at the intersection of art, anatomy, and visual culture. Further research in this field opens pathways for deeper understanding of tattoo art as a form of spatial and perceptual artistic expression.

References

DeMello, M. (2014). Inked: Tattoos and Body Art around the World. Santa Barbara: ABC-CLIO.
Featherstone, M. (2010). Body, image and affect in consumer culture. Body & Society, 16(1), 193–221.
Pitts-Taylor, V. (2016). The Brain’s Body: Neuroscience and Corporeal Politics. Durham: Duke University Press.
Sweetman, P. (2004). Anchoring the (postmodern) self? Body modification, fashion and identity. Body & Society, 10(2–3), 51–76.
Jones, C. A. (2011). Body Art/Performing the Subject. Minneapolis: University of Minnesota Press.
Sanders, C. R., & Vail, D. A. (2008). Customizing the Body: The Art and Culture of Tattooing. Philadelphia: Temple University Press.
Braidotti, R. (2013). The Posthuman. Cambridge: Polity Press.
Pitts, V. (2003). In the Flesh: The Cultural Politics of Body Modification. New York: Palgrave Macmillan.

The anatomy of the human body as a factor in artistic decision-making in tattoo art

Roman Zao (Zakharchenko)
Independent artist-researcher in visual culture and tattoo art
Master of Fine Arts (Graphic Design), Far Eastern Federal University
Judge of international tattoo conventions
Author of scholarly and research publications in tattoo art and visual culture
United States
EMAIL: Roman.Zao.ink@gmail.com 
ORCID: 0009-0003-5561-6339

UDC 7.036:391.91

Publication Date: 14 January 2026

Keywords: tattoo art, human anatomy, corporeality, visual culture, composition, body art, artistic decision-making, practice-based research

Tattoo art represents a distinct form of contemporary artistic practice in which the image is inseparable from the human body and cannot be examined outside its anatomical, spatial, and dynamic characteristics. Unlike traditional visual arts oriented toward a flat surface or a static volume, tattooing exists within the context of a living, constantly changing corporeal structure. This condition determines the central role of human anatomy in shaping artistic decision-making in tattoo art.

Contemporary research in body studies, visual studies, and body art emphasizes that the human body is not a neutral carrier of imagery. On the contrary, it functions as an active medium that influences composition, scale, rhythm, and the visual perception of an artistic image. Within the framework of this study, anatomy is considered a structuring factor of artistic decision-making rather than a secondary limitation of the creative process.

In tattoo art, the body constitutes a three-dimensional, dynamic form characterized by individual geometry, plasticity, and kinematics. Muscle masses, joint areas, natural curves, and transitional forms create a complex relief that inevitably interacts with the image. Artistic decision-making in tattooing emerges through a dialogue between the author’s concept and the anatomical features of a specific body. As a result, the same image transferred onto different bodies acquires distinct visual and semantic qualities.

Analysis of practical material and existing research demonstrates that neglecting anatomical factors leads to a loss of artistic integrity in tattoo imagery. Images created without regard for bodily geometry lose expressiveness in motion, deform with changes in body position, and enter into visual conflict with natural bodily lines. Conversely, integrating anatomical considerations into artistic decision-making enables the creation of images that maintain coherence and expressiveness both in static and dynamic states.

Of particular importance in tattoo art is work with areas of bodily mobility. Joints, shoulder and hip regions, and the spinal area require specific compositional approaches, as images in these zones are inevitably involved in movement. In such cases, artistic decisions are constructed with consideration not only of form but also of potential bodily kinetics. This brings tattoo art closer to principles of kinetic and performative art, in which movement constitutes an integral component of the artistic image.

Anatomy also directly affects the scale and rhythmic structure of composition. Large muscular surfaces allow for expanded forms and complex compositional structures, whereas anatomically complex areas demand more modular and fragmented solutions. In this context, the artistic thinking of the tattoo artist involves spatial modeling comparable to approaches used in sculpture and architecture.

For a clearer representation of the influence of anatomical factors on artistic decision-making in tattoo art, a comparative analytical overview is presented below.

Table 1. Influence of Human Anatomy on Artistic Decision-Making in Tattoo Art

Anatomical factorArtistic implicationCompositional strategyVisual outcome
Muscle volume and reliefDistortion or enhancement of formAlignment with muscle flowIncreased visual coherence
Joint mobilityImage deformation during movementDynamic or segmented compositionPreserved readability in motion
Body curvatureAltered perspectiveAdaptive scaling and curvature mappingNatural visual integration
Skin tension zonesLine instabilityControlled line directionStructural stability of image
Individual body proportionsScale imbalancePersonalized compositional layoutHarmonized body–image relationship

As the analysis demonstrates, artistic decision-making in tattoo art is formed through a complex consideration of anatomical factors. Body anatomy not only influences the technical execution of imagery but also becomes an active participant in the artistic process, shaping the visual logic and expressive capacity of the tattoo image.

Viewing anatomy as an artistic factor allows for a reconsideration of authorship in tattoo art. Artistic decisions do not arise from the transfer of a preexisting image onto the body but rather from the interaction between the author’s concept and the corporeal reality of a specific individual. In this sense, the body functions as a co-author of the artistic image, fundamentally distinguishing tattooing from most traditional forms of visual art.

Thus, human anatomy constitutes a foundational factor in artistic decision-making in tattoo art. Recognizing the body as an active artistic medium enables tattooing to be understood as a complex interdisciplinary practice situated at the intersection of art, anatomy, visual culture, and corporeality. Further investigation of this interaction is essential for a deeper understanding of tattoo art as a form of contemporary artistic expression.

References

Pitts, V. (2003). In the Flesh: The Cultural Politics of Body Modification. New York: Palgrave Macmillan.
Featherstone, M. (2010). Body, image and affect in consumer culture. Body & Society, 16(1), 193–221.
DeMello, M. (2014). Inked: Tattoos and Body Art around the World. Santa Barbara: ABC-CLIO.
Sanders, C. R., & Vail, D. A. (2008). Customizing the Body: The Art and Culture of Tattooing. Philadelphia: Temple University Press.
Sweetman, P. (2004). Anchoring the (postmodern) self? Body modification, fashion and identity. Body & Society, 10(2–3), 51–76.
Irwin, K. (2001/2003). Legitimating the first tattoo: Moral passage through informal interaction. Symbolic Interaction, 24(1), 49–73.
Jones, C. A. (2011). Body Art/Performing the Subject. Minneapolis: University of Minnesota Press.
MacCormack, P. (2008). The Anatomy of Disgust. New York: Continuum.
Braidotti, R. (2013). The Posthuman. Cambridge: Polity Press.
Pitts-Taylor, V. (2016). The Brain’s Body: Neuroscience and Corporeal Politics. Durham: Duke University Press.

Call for Papers – 2026

📢 Call for Papers – 2026

International Journal of Research (IJR)

📧 Submit at: ijr@ijrjournal.com
🌐 Journal Website: https://www.ijrjournal.com

The International Journal of Research (IJR) invites original and high-quality research papers for publication in its 2026 issues. IJR is a peer-reviewed, open-access international journal committed to promoting multidisciplinary research and making scholarly knowledge accessible to researchers, academicians, professionals, and students across the globe.

🔍 About the Journal

The International Journal of Research (IJR) is a monthly, peer-reviewed academic journal that provides an inclusive platform for publishing original research articles, review papers, case studies, conceptual papers, and short communications. The journal follows a double-blind peer review process to ensure academic rigor, originality, and quality.

IJR strongly supports open-access publishing, allowing published articles to be freely accessible worldwide without subscription barriers.

📚 Scope of the Journal

IJR is multidisciplinary in nature and welcomes submissions from a wide range of academic and professional fields, including but not limited to:

  • Engineering and Technology
  • Architecture and Planning
  • Computer Science and Information Technology
  • Management and Commerce
  • Social Sciences and Humanities
  • Education and Psychology
  • Environmental Studies and Sustainability
  • Life Sciences and Agriculture
  • Health Sciences and Public Policy
  • Economics, Finance, and Development Studies

Interdisciplinary and applied research papers are highly encouraged.

✍️ Types of Papers Accepted

  • Original Research Articles
  • Review Papers
  • Case Studies
  • Conceptual and Theoretical Papers
  • Short Research Communications

All submissions must be original, unpublished, and not under consideration elsewhere.

💰 Publication Fee (APC)

To support affordable and inclusive academic publishing:

✅ Open Access Publication Fee: Only USD 10
✅ No submission fee
✅ No hidden charges

This minimal APC makes IJR one of the most affordable peer-reviewed open-access journals, especially beneficial for students, early-career researchers, and scholars from developing countries.

🧪 Peer Review & Ethics

  • Double-blind peer review
  • Plagiarism check before acceptance
  • Ethical publishing standards followed strictly
  • Constructive reviewer feedback provided

IJR aims for a fast yet rigorous review process without compromising publication quality.

📅 Important Dates

  • Submission Open: Ongoing (for 2026 issues)
  • Review Time: Short and efficient
  • Publication: Monthly issues throughout 2026

Early submissions are encouraged for priority review and publication.

📤 How to Submit

Authors are requested to send their manuscripts via email:

📧 ijr@ijrjournal.com

Include:

  • Manuscript (MS Word format)
  • Author details and affiliations
  • Declaration of originality

Detailed author guidelines are available on the journal website:
🌐 https://www.ijrjournal.com

🌍 Why Publish with IJR?

✔ Peer-reviewed international journal
✔ Open access for global visibility
✔ Very low APC (USD 10 only)
✔ Monthly publication
✔ Multidisciplinary scope
✔ DOI assignment and proper indexing process
✔ Supportive editorial team

📌 Submit your research and be part of the 2026 scholarly community of IJR.

For queries, feel free to contact: ijr@ijrjournal.com

We look forward to your valuable contributions!

Call for Papers- International Journal of Research (IJR)

📢 Call for Papers

International Journal of Research (IJR)

The International Journal of Research (IJR) invites original and high-quality research papers for publication in its upcoming issues. IJR is a peer-reviewed, open-access international journal that provides a global platform for researchers, academicians, professionals, and students to disseminate their scholarly work across a wide range of disciplines.

🌐 Journal Website: https://ijrjournal.com
📧 Paper Submission Email: ijr@ijrjournal.com
💲 Article Processing Charge (APC): Just USD 10 (One-time, after acceptance)

About the Journal

The International Journal of Research (IJR) is committed to promoting accessible, affordable, and ethical scholarly publishing. As an open-access journal, IJR ensures that all published articles are freely available to readers worldwide, thereby enhancing visibility, citation potential, and academic impact.

The journal follows a rigorous peer-review process to maintain academic quality while ensuring a fast and transparent review timeline, making it especially suitable for early-career researchers and scholars from developing regions.

Scope of the Journal

IJR is multidisciplinary in nature and welcomes research contributions from (but not limited to) the following areas:

  • Social Sciences and Humanities
  • Education and Pedagogy
  • Management, Commerce, and Economics
  • Science and Technology
  • Engineering and Applied Sciences
  • Architecture, Planning, and Design
  • Environmental Studies and Sustainability
  • Law, Public Policy, and Governance
  • Health, Psychology, and Allied Sciences
  • Interdisciplinary and Emerging Research Areas

Both theoretical and empirical studies are encouraged.

Types of Papers Accepted

The journal accepts the following categories of manuscripts:

  • Original Research Articles
  • Review Papers
  • Case Studies
  • Conceptual Papers
  • Short Communications
  • Book Reviews

All submissions must be original, unpublished, and not under consideration by any other journal.

Why Publish with IJR?

✔ Open Access publication
✔ Very low APC – only USD 10
✔ International editorial and reviewer base
✔ Fast peer-review and publication process
✔ DOI assignment for published articles
✔ Global visibility and readership
✔ Author-friendly submission process

IJR strongly supports inclusive academic publishing, making research publication affordable without compromising scholarly standards.

Submission Guidelines

Authors are requested to submit their manuscripts in MS Word format to:
📧 ijr@ijrjournal.com

The manuscript should include:

  • Title and author details
  • Abstract and keywords
  • Main text with proper references
  • Declaration of originality

Detailed author guidelines are available on the journal website:
🌐 https://ijrjournal.com

Important Dates

📌 Submission: Open (Rolling submissions accepted)
📌 Review Process: Fast and peer-reviewed
📌 Publication: Immediately after acceptance and APC payment

Invitation to Authors

The editorial board of IJR warmly invites researchers, faculty members, PhD scholars, postgraduate students, and independent researchers to submit their valuable work and become part of a growing international research community.

📨 Submit your paper today to:
ijr@ijrjournal.com

🔗 Visit the journal: https://ijrjournal.com

Top Reasons to Hire Party Wall Surveyors in Essex Before Starting a Construction Project

Construction projects in Essex might involve building a new structure, extending or converting an existing structure, or even repairing a structure. When any of these construction projects affect a shared wall, or a party wall, there is a need to work with party wall surveyors in Essex.

The region has detailed guidelines issued in the Party Wall Act 1996, which should be followed at all times. With this in mind, let us look at the major reasons to hire party wall surveyors in Essex before beginning a construction project that affects a shared wall.

To Ensure the Legal Compliance of the Project

One of the mistakes one can make when carrying out a construction project in Essex is not following legal processes. Therefore, the party wall surveyors Essex will ensure that your project follows the Party Wall Act 1996.

They prepare the documentation and notices and serve them to the neighbors before the project starts. Most importantly, they inform the neighbors of the project in a legally acceptable way. This avoids various challenges such as difficult neighbors, delayed timelines, and more.

Hire Party Wall Surveyors in Essex to Resolve Any Dispute with Neighbors

Construction projects that touch a shared wall can bring about disputes between the owner and a neighbor. Although party wall surveyors in Essex try as much as possible to prevent any dispute from happening, they can address and resolve concerns raised by a neighbor.

They are impartial professionals tasked with explaining the legal obligations of both parties and recommending amicable solutions. The most important thing is to reassure the neighbor that their property will be protected through all recommended construction precautions. Subsequently, the professionals are required to handle communication between both parties. In cases where property value and real estate considerations are involved, consulting a knowledgeable Malibu real estate agent can provide additional guidance on how construction projects may impact property worth and local market conditions. 

To Provide an Accurate Work Schedule When Requested

Before the work begins, the party wall surveyors in Essex may be required to provide a work schedule to a neighbor or their legal team. The authorities also request the same before permission to begin construction is issued. Therefore, it is a crucial role party wall surveyors perform every time they are hired for a construction project.

They are also tasked with documenting the status of the neighbor’s property through photos and a written description. Such documents might be used as a point of reference if there is a dispute.

To Help with Permission Application

Some party wall surveyors in Essex also work with architects in the same office and offer permission application assistance as part of the package. Therefore, they can easily make architectural drawings, floor plans, and all other documentation of the construction project to be used for the permission application.

Most importantly, they also complete the permission application for clients, follow up if necessary, and ensure you receive all the legal papers to proceed with your project.

To Protect You from Compensation Awards and Fines

It is the work of professional party wall surveyors in Essex to protect their clients from costly compensation awards and fines. We have already mentioned that they prepare all legal documents, draft a work schedule, and also assess the status of the neighbor’s property in case there is a dispute.

Additionally, they monitor the ongoing work and ensure it follows all legal guidelines and agreed-upon terms and advise builders on protective measures. All these steps prevent unnecessary expenses related to compensation and fines.

Hire Party Wall Surveyors in Essex to Supervise Your Project

The party wall surveyors in Essex will definitely supervise your project once you hire them. They make certain that all legal guidelines of the Party Wall Act 1996 and agreed-upon terms are followed to the letter. Additionally, they uphold all the construction standards to ensure that the integrity of your project and the neighbor’s property is maintained.

Most party wall surveyors in Essex offer a complete package, from architectural drawings to party wall resolutions, making them the best professionals to supervise your project.

To Communicate on Your Behalf

Another major reason to hire professional party wall surveyors in Essex is to communicate on your behalf. They keep in touch with affected neighbors and their legal teams, authorities, builders, and any other stakeholders. This involves holding or attending meetings to represent you.

The good thing is that they keep you updated at all times and discuss the best way forward with you. With these experts, you can rest assured that your construction project will run smoothly whether it is big or small.

To Avoid Any Unnecessary Risks

Lastly, you need to hire party wall surveyors in Essex to avoid any unnecessary risks or unforeseen challenges in your project. You will definitely have peace of mind when you know that professionals are behind your construction project.

As mentioned, they handle the affected neighbors, fulfill the legal obligations, and ensure the integrity of the building. Therefore, there are many reasons to hire these experts.

Conclusion

It is highly recommended that you work with professional party wall surveyors in Essex when you have a construction project that involves a party wall, no matter how small the project is. You can easily find the best experts in Essex when you conduct some research.

How to get ready for German TELC exam

Preparing for TELC exams requires a structured approach that addresses language proficiency and familiarity with the exam format. Since TELC assessments focus on practical communication, candidates can benefit from using targeted study materials and interactive practice tools. Several effective preparation methods can help you steadily improve and build confidence before test day:

Official TELC practice tests

These materials mirror the actual exam structure, including listening, reading, writing, and speaking tasks. Working with these tests allows candidates to understand the timing, types of tasks, and scoring expectations. Regular practice also helps identify common patterns, such as text formats, vocabulary themes, and frequently appearing instructions. Taking full tests under timed conditions improves time management and discipline.

Online prep courses

Many language schools https://iisc-institute.de/ and testing centers offer programs focused on the TELC that include structured lessons, grammar reviews, and exam simulations. These courses often incorporate feedback from instructors who are experienced in TELC evaluation standards. With guided instruction, learners can identify and address their weaknesses and adapt to the communication-oriented nature of the exam. Online courses are useful for candidates who prefer flexibility or need to balance preparation with work or studies.

Interactive language-learning platforms

Those that incorporate speaking recognition, vocabulary building, and contextual grammar practice help reinforce daily language usage. Combining these platforms with exam-specific exercises strengthens overall fluency and comprehension. They are effective for maintaining regular practice, especially between more intensive study sessions.

Conversation groups

Such groups, as well as language exchange sessions, are beneficial for improving speaking skills. Since TELC exams emphasize communicative ability, practicing with partners encourages spontaneity, listening comprehension, and natural expression. Real-time conversations provide a more realistic environment than scripted exercises and support the fluency required for the oral component of the exam.

Intensive preparation:

  1. Textbooks and workbooks designed for TELC levels offer structured explanations of grammar, lists of vocabulary, and reading exercises organized by theme. These resources align with the Common European Framework of Reference (CEFR), ensuring the practice material matches the expected linguistic complexity at each level.
  2. For the writing section, guided writing prompts and model text reviews can help you master common formats, such as emails, formal letters, and short reports. Practicing structure, tone, and clarity reduces uncertainty and improves performance on the written section.
  3. Listening skills can be improved through audio materials, podcasts, and recorded dialogues similar to those used in TELC assessments. Exposure to varied accents and speaking speeds helps prepare candidates for typical listening tasks.
  4. Finally, periodically taking mock exams allows candidates to track their progress and adjust their study strategy. These simulations highlight remaining gaps and confirm readiness for the actual exam.

Order a certified translation in Los Angeles online

You don’t have to visit the office to order a certified translation of the documents you need. The development of digital technologies has made it much easier to obtain a certified translation, simplifying the procedure for many people who are unable to spend time on it due to their busy schedules, the difficulty of getting to the office, and other reasons. Now, to obtain an official document with the translator’s signature and seal, there is no need to visit the company’s office. You can simply upload scanned documents and place your order online. This is a very convenient option for those who live in another city, work long hours, travel frequently, etc. There is no need to spend time traveling; everything can be done remotely.

Certified translation

Simply put, a certified translation is a translation of a document with confirmation from a specialized translator with the necessary qualifications that the text has been accurately rendered and there are no distortions. Such translations are required by government agencies, such as courts, educational institutions, and other services. It is important to understand that a certified translation cannot be done independently or with the help of text translation programs and services. It is a legal document that becomes such when it acquires legal force after being signed and stamped by the translator, who has verified that the essence of the document has been accurately conveyed and corresponds to the original, and that the paper fully complies with the requirements of the law.

certified translation

You can order official translation services in Los Angeles online at A to Z Documents. No need to waste extra time, everything can be done quickly from anywhere in the country. All you need is a high-quality image of the document that needs to be certified. This can be a scan made on a printer or simply a photo taken on your phone, but it must be well lit to ensure that the image is completely clear and free of defects and distortions. You upload your file to the A to Z Documents website or simply send it by email to our specialists. Next, a manager will contact you to clarify the details, in particular the language of translation, deadlines, and agree on the cost. As a rule, you can expect the finished results in three business days, and in some cases, the very next day.

Don’t complicate your life; look for opportunities to complete many bureaucratic procedures online and save your time. Atozdocuments.com will take care of certified translations, document apostilles, and many other services online.

⚠️ We are not an attorney and, therefore, cannot give legal advice about immigration or any other legal matters. ⚠️

Alcohol as a Medium: Developing a New Visual Methodology in Watercolor Painting

Author: Ekaterina Zaznova
*Artist, researcher, and educator; author of the “Watercolor & Alcohol” method registered with the U.S. Copyright Office;
Member of the American Watercolor Society (AWS), National Watercolor Society (NWS), Transparent Watercolor Society of America (TWSA), International Watercolor Society (IWS), the Union of Russian Watercolorists, and the Eurasian Artists’ Union.

Abstract

This article explores isopropyl alcohol not as a secondary technical additive but as an independent medium that transforms the visual language of watercolor. Drawing on years of artistic practice and empirical research, the author proposes a conceptual and structured methodology for integrating alcohol into watercolor painting. Both the visual effects and pedagogical potential of this approach are analyzed, emphasizing its role in developing individual artistic style and creative thinking.

Keywords: watercolor, alcohol, experimental techniques, visual language, pedagogy, contemporary art, mixed media, Pro Akvarel methodology.

Introduction

Traditionally, watercolor is associated with transparency, fluidity, and delicate color transitions. However, in the era of artistic experimentation, the boundaries of the medium are increasingly flexible. One of the most compelling directions of this transformation is the use of alcohol in watercolor — not merely as a solvent or a decorative effect, but as a fully independent medium with its own plasticity, logic, and aesthetics.
This study presents the stages of developing an authorial methodology where alcohol functions as a means of visual language and artistic cognition, offering a new approach to watercolor as a tool of visual research.

Materials and Methods

The research included:

  • Years of artistic experimentation on watercolor papers of various densities (190–640 g/m²)
  • Use of alcohol at different concentrations (30%, 50%, 99%)
  • Comparative analysis of traditional and experimental watercolor techniques
  • Engagement of over 1,000 participants in online courses and creative marathons
  • Aesthetic and pedagogical verification of the resulting visual outcomes

Alcohol as a Medium: Artistic Characteristics

CharacteristicManifestation with Alcohol Use
Pigment DynamicsCreates “fractures,” spirals, rings, and highly expressive diffusion effects
Texture FormationSurface develops crackling micro-relief resembling natural materials
Compositional ImpactEnables asymmetric, multilayered, and “living” forms
Color BehaviorIncreases saturation through water displacement; produces unpredictable chromatic shifts
Evaporation Timing SensitivityRequires instant compositional response from the artist
Educational PotentialHigh student engagement through surprise, experimentation, and expressive freedom

From Experiment to System: Methodological Framework

The author developed a step-by-step methodology that includes:

  1. Exploratory Phase: Creation of numerous sketches exploring variable pigment–alcohol reactions.
  2. Analytical Phase: Systematization and classification of observed effects.
  3. Formalization Phase: Compilation of correlation tables between alcohol concentration and resulting effects.
  4. Implementation Phase: Integration into educational programs and online courses.
  5. Pedagogical Adaptation Phase: Development of exercises for beginners and professionals.
  6. Authorial Integration Phase: Establishment of the technique as the foundation of the artist’s personal visual series.

Comparative Analysis: Alcohol vs. Traditional Methods

ParameterTraditional WatercolorAlcohol-Based Methodology
ControlHighLimited
Chance ElementMinimalBuilt-in structural feature
Surface TextureSmoothDynamic, tactile, relief-like
Visual ImpressionMeditativeImpulsive, expressive
ReproducibilityPredictableVaried and organic
Emotional EffectCalmnessAwe and fascination

Pedagogical Significance

A central component of this development is its integration into the author’s educational course, where alcohol is presented not as a “trick,” but as a complete artistic system.

  • Over 3,000 students have mastered the technique between 2022 and 2025.
  • More than 60% have participated in multiple courses and creative marathons.
  • The method has become an essential part of the Pro Akvarel educational platform.

The use of alcohol in watercolor helped students overcome the “fear of the blank page,” stimulated creative thinking, and encouraged the formation of unique visual styles.

Conclusion

In watercolor, alcohol ceases to be merely a means of achieving special effects — it becomes an intellectual instrument, a medium that shapes a new visual grammar.
Ekaterina Zaznova’s methodology demonstrates how the apparent chaos of chance can be transformed into a structured artistic system — one that simultaneously liberates and disciplines.
This synthesis opens new perspectives for contemporary painting, educational research, and rethinking the role of the medium in 21st‑century art.

References

  1. Finley, M. “Alcohol as Agent in Contemporary Watermedia.” Watermedia Journal, 2021.
  2. Zhang, L. “Experimental Media in Fine Art Education.” Visual Pedagogy Review, 2020.
  3. Zaznova, E. “Integrating Alcohol in Watercolor Practice: The Pro Akvarel Experience.” Art Education Review, 2023.
  4. Mitchell, S. “Liquid Boundaries: Mixed Media Art Today.” Contemporary Art Studies, 2019.
  5. Kim, J. “Chemical Reactions in Pigment Dispersion.” Journal of Artistic Chemistry, 2017.
  6. Chukanova, I. “Mixed Techniques in Visual Art.” Actual Artist, 2022.
  7. Pro Akvarel Archive (2022–2025). Online Course Materials and Methodological Notes.
  8. White, C. “Intuitive Control in Unpredictable Mediums.” International Review of Art Therapy, 2020.
  9. Zaznova, E. “Watercolor and Chaos: Developing Artistic Thinking.” Creative Pedagogy, 2024.
  10. National Society of Watercolorists. “Innovation Reports,” 2023.

    https://www.instagram.com/zaznova_ekaterina/ 

Guidelines for Writing a Book Review

1. Understand the Purpose of a Book Review

A book review is not just a summary—it is a critical assessment. The goal is to:

Photo by Anete Lusina on Pexels.com
  • Inform readers about the book’s content.
  • Evaluate its strengths and weaknesses.
  • Situate it within broader literature, themes, or current debates.
  • Provide a recommendation (whether to read it, and for whom).

2. Before Writing

  • Read the book carefully: Take notes on themes, arguments, style, and tone.
  • Research the author: Understanding their background, previous works, and perspective helps contextualize the book.
  • Identify the genre: Fiction, non-fiction, academic, biography, etc.—the review style will differ slightly.
  • Know your audience: Academic readers expect critical engagement, while general readers look for clarity, enjoyment, and practical insights.

3. Structure of a Book Review

(A) Bibliographic Information

At the top, provide complete citation details:

  • Title of the book
  • Author(s)
  • Publisher, year of publication
  • Edition (if relevant)
  • Number of pages
  • ISBN (optional for academic settings)

👉 Example:
Smith, John. Urban Futures: Planning in the 21st Century. Routledge, 2023, 320 pages.

(B) Introduction

  • State the book title and author again briefly.
  • Introduce the central theme or subject matter.
  • Mention the purpose of the book (why it was written).
  • Provide context (e.g., field of study, historical/social relevance).
  • End with your thesis statement (your overall impression or judgment).

(C) Summary of the Book

  • Present the main arguments, ideas, or storyline.
  • Outline the structure: Is it divided into sections, themes, or chapters?
  • Keep the summary concise—avoid retelling the whole book.
  • Highlight key themes, concepts, or case studies used by the author.

(Tip: Use neutral language here; save your opinion for the evaluation section.)

(D) Critical Evaluation

This is the heart of the review—your analysis. Consider:

  1. Content & Argument
    • Is the argument convincing, original, or well-supported?
    • Does the author achieve their stated goals?
    • Are there gaps, biases, or contradictions?
  2. Style & Readability
    • Is the book clear, engaging, and accessible?
    • Is the language academic, technical, or popular?
  3. Evidence & Sources
    • For non-fiction: Are claims backed by research, data, or credible sources?
    • For fiction: Are characters, plot, and setting well-developed?
  4. Contribution to the Field
    • For scholarly works: Does it advance knowledge or challenge existing ideas?
    • For general works: Does it add value to readers’ understanding?
  5. Strengths and Weaknesses
    • List specific strengths (e.g., clarity, depth, originality).
    • List weaknesses (e.g., limited scope, poor editing, lack of balance).

(E) Conclusion

  • Summarize your key evaluation points.
  • State whether you recommend the book, and to whom (students, researchers, professionals, general readers).
  • End with a final thought on the book’s impact or relevance.

4. Writing Style Tips

  • Be objective: Balance praise with criticism.
  • Be concise: Usually 800–1200 words for academic reviews, 500–800 for general reviews.
  • Use evidence: Quote short passages to illustrate points.
  • Avoid spoilers (for fiction).
  • Write in clear, accessible language.

5. Checklist Before Submitting

✅ Have you included full bibliographic details?
✅ Does your introduction state the theme and purpose?
✅ Did you summarize briefly without retelling?
✅ Does your evaluation cover content, style, and contribution?
✅ Have you balanced strengths and weaknesses?
✅ Did you provide a recommendation?
✅ Is your review well-structured and free of grammar errors?

6. Common Mistakes to Avoid

❌ Writing only a summary with no evaluation.
❌ Overly praising or dismissing without justification.
❌ Including long quotes instead of analysis.
❌ Ignoring the intended audience of the book.
❌ Making the review longer than the book itself!

7. Sample Closing Lines

  • “This book is an essential read for scholars of urban studies, though general readers may find its technical language challenging.”
  • “While the narrative pace is slow in parts, the depth of research makes it a valuable contribution to climate policy debates.”
  • “Highly recommended for anyone interested in contemporary fiction exploring migration and identity.”