Citation

Yadav, P. (2026). Modernity and the Subaltern Experience in the Works of Kiran Desai, Arundhati Roy, and Aravind Adiga. International Journal of Research, 12(12), 689–694. https://doi.org/10.26643/rb.v118i1.7254

Priyanka Yadav

Research Scholar

Dept. of English, J. P. University, Chapra

Abstract

The emergence of modernity in postcolonial India has generated complex social, economic, and cultural transformations that have significantly influenced the lives of marginalized communities. Indian English fiction has played a crucial role in representing these changes by foregrounding the voices of the subaltern and interrogating dominant narratives of progress and development. This paper examines the representation of modernity and the subaltern experience in the selected works of Kiran Desai, Arundhati Roy, and Aravind Adiga. Through a close reading of The Inheritance of Loss, The God of Small Things, and The White Tiger, this study explores how these writers depict the tensions between tradition and modernity, privilege and deprivation, power and resistance. Drawing upon postcolonial theory, subaltern studies, and sociological perspectives, the paper argues that these novelists present modernity as a contradictory force that simultaneously promises mobility and perpetuates inequality. The protagonists and marginalized characters in these works negotiate their identities within oppressive social structures shaped by class, caste, gender, and global capitalism. By highlighting lived experiences of exclusion and aspiration, Desai, Roy, and Adiga challenge hegemonic representations of Indian modernity and create alternative narratives that foreground subaltern agency. This comparative analysis demonstrates that contemporary Indian English fiction serves as a powerful medium for critiquing social injustice and reimagining inclusive forms of development.

Keywords: Modernity, Subaltern Studies, Indian English Fiction, Marginality, Postcolonial Literature, Power, Globalization, Social Inequality

Introduction

The concept of modernity occupies a central position in discussions of postcolonial societies, particularly in the context of developing nations such as India. Modernity is often associated with industrialization, urbanization, technological advancement, education, and global integration. However, in postcolonial settings, modernity is rarely experienced uniformly. Instead, it is marked by uneven development, social stratification, and persistent forms of marginalization. While certain sections of society benefit from economic liberalization and globalization, large segments continue to remain excluded from opportunities and resources. This uneven distribution of power and privilege has generated a complex social reality in which traditional hierarchies coexist with modern institutions.

Indian English literature has consistently engaged with these contradictions. Contemporary novelists have explored how modernity shapes individual lives and collective identities, particularly among marginalized communities. The subaltern, a term popularized by the Subaltern Studies Group and theorists such as Gayatri Chakravorty Spivak, refers to those social groups who are excluded from political representation and cultural dominance. These groups include the rural poor, lower castes, women, migrant workers, and other disenfranchised communities. Their voices are often silenced within dominant historical and literary narratives.

Kiran Desai, Arundhati Roy, and Aravind Adiga belong to a generation of writers who have critically examined the impact of modernity on Indian society. Their novels reflect the anxieties, aspirations, and struggles of individuals located at the margins of power. Through innovative narrative techniques and socially engaged storytelling, these writers interrogate the myth of progress and expose the human costs of development. This paper seeks to analyze how modernity is represented in The Inheritance of Loss, The God of Small Things, and The White Tiger, and how the subaltern experience is articulated within these narratives.

By adopting a comparative approach, this study aims to highlight both common concerns and distinctive perspectives in the works of these authors. It argues that while Desai emphasizes emotional displacement and cultural alienation, Roy foregrounds caste and gender oppression, and Adiga focuses on class conflict and economic exploitation. Together, their writings provide a multidimensional critique of contemporary Indian modernity.

Theoretical Framework: Modernity and Subaltern Studies

Theoretical discussions of modernity in postcolonial contexts emphasize its ambivalent nature. Scholars such as Partha Chatterjee and Homi Bhabha have argued that postcolonial modernity differs significantly from its Western counterpart. It emerges within conditions of colonial domination and economic dependency, resulting in hybrid social formations. Modern institutions such as democracy, education, and capitalism coexist with feudal structures, patriarchal values, and caste hierarchies. As a result, modernity becomes a site of conflict rather than consensus.

Subaltern Studies, initiated in the 1980s by scholars like Ranajit Guha, sought to recover the voices of marginalized groups from elite historiography. This approach challenged nationalist and colonial narratives that ignored popular resistance and everyday struggles. Spivak’s influential question, “Can the Subaltern Speak?”, further problematized the representation of marginalized voices in academic and literary discourse. She argued that even well-intentioned intellectuals often appropriate subaltern experiences, thereby reinforcing power structures.

In literary studies, the subaltern perspective has encouraged critics to examine how marginalized characters are portrayed and whether they possess narrative agency. The intersection of modernity and subalternity reveals how development projects, globalization, and urban expansion often displace traditional communities and exacerbate inequalities. Literature becomes a crucial space for articulating these tensions and contesting dominant ideologies.

This paper draws upon postcolonial theory, subaltern studies, and sociological insights to analyze how Desai, Roy, and Adiga represent marginalized lives. It considers narrative voice, characterization, spatial settings, and symbolic imagery as key elements through which modernity and subalternity are negotiated.

Modernity and Displacement in Kiran Desai’s The Inheritance of Loss

Kiran Desai’s The Inheritance of Loss presents a nuanced exploration of globalization, migration, and cultural alienation. Set in the Himalayan town of Kalimpong and interspersed with scenes from the United States, the novel portrays characters caught between local traditions and global aspirations. The narrative foregrounds emotional and psychological dimensions of marginalization rather than overt political resistance.

The character of Biju, an undocumented immigrant in America, represents the transnational subaltern. His journey reflects the disillusionment of many migrants who seek economic mobility but encounter exploitation and isolation. Working in restaurant kitchens under harsh conditions, Biju remains invisible within the host society. His experience exposes the darker side of globalization, where labor mobility benefits corporations while dehumanizing workers.

In India, characters such as Sai and Gyan grapple with identity crises shaped by colonial legacies and modern education. The judge, Jemubhai Patel, embodies internalized colonialism. Educated in England, he despises his native culture and family, resulting in emotional repression and social withdrawal. His alienation illustrates how modernity, mediated through colonial institutions, can produce self-denial and cultural dislocation.

The Gorkhaland movement depicted in the novel highlights regional marginalization and political unrest. Insurgent youth challenge state authority, reflecting frustrations arising from economic neglect and cultural invisibility. However, Desai presents this resistance as fragmented and emotionally charged rather than ideologically coherent.

Through these narratives, Desai portrays modernity as a force that fragments identities and intensifies feelings of loss. The subaltern in her novel is characterized by vulnerability, displacement, and longing. While her characters rarely achieve structural transformation, their emotional struggles reveal the human consequences of uneven development.

Caste, Gender, and Subaltern Resistance in Arundhati Roy’s The God of Small Things

Arundhati Roy’s The God of Small Things offers a powerful critique of social hierarchies rooted in caste, gender, and class. Set in Kerala, the novel examines how rigid social norms regulate individual desires and perpetuate inequality. Roy situates her narrative within both local traditions and broader political contexts, including communism and globalization.

Velutha, an Untouchable carpenter, represents the most marginalized figure in the novel. Despite his technical skills and political awareness, he remains excluded from social mobility due to caste discrimination. His relationship with Ammu violates social codes and triggers brutal repression. Velutha’s death symbolizes the violent silencing of subaltern aspirations that challenge hegemonic structures.

Ammu’s marginalization as a divorced woman further illustrates gendered oppression. Her lack of economic independence and social status exposes her vulnerability within patriarchal systems. Although educated and emotionally resilient, she is denied dignity and autonomy. Her tragic fate reflects the limitations imposed on women within both traditional and modern frameworks.

The twin protagonists, Estha and Rahel, experience psychological trauma resulting from social conflict and familial breakdown. Their fragmented identities reflect the broader disintegration of social cohesion under modern pressures. Roy employs a non-linear narrative structure to mirror this fragmentation and to challenge conventional storytelling modes.

Roy’s political engagement distinguishes her approach from Desai’s more introspective style. She foregrounds collective injustice and structural violence, emphasizing the need for social transformation. By centering the narrative on marginalized voices, Roy enables the subaltern to speak, even if temporarily, through literary representation.

Modernity in Roy’s novel is associated with consumerism, political corruption, and cultural erosion. Yet, she also gestures toward alternative forms of solidarity and resistance. Love, memory, and storytelling emerge as subversive forces that contest dominant power relations.

Class Conflict and Economic Exploitation in Aravind Adiga’s The White Tiger

Aravind Adiga’s The White Tiger presents a stark portrayal of neoliberal India characterized by extreme economic disparities. Through the voice of Balram Halwai, the novel exposes the brutal realities of class exploitation and social immobility. Adiga adopts a confessional narrative style that allows the subaltern protagonist to narrate his own story.

Balram originates from the “Darkness,” a metaphor for rural poverty and systemic neglect. His early life is marked by deprivation, child labor, and lack of educational opportunities. Despite his intelligence, structural barriers prevent his upward mobility. The novel thus critiques meritocratic myths associated with modern capitalism.

Working as a driver for a wealthy family, Balram witnesses corruption, hypocrisy, and moral decay among elites. His employers embody the contradictions of modernity, combining Westernized lifestyles with feudal attitudes. They benefit from globalization while perpetuating exploitation.

Balram’s eventual act of murder and theft represents a radical form of resistance. By becoming an entrepreneur through criminal means, he breaks free from servitude. However, his success raises ethical questions. Adiga does not romanticize violence but presents it as a product of systemic injustice. The “rooster coop” metaphor illustrates how social conditioning prevents collective rebellion among the poor.

Unlike Desai’s passive sufferers and Roy’s tragic rebels, Adiga’s protagonist actively reshapes his destiny, albeit through morally ambiguous methods. His voice is assertive, ironic, and confrontational. This narrative strategy challenges elite literary conventions and foregrounds subaltern consciousness.

Modernity in The White Tiger is depicted as ruthless competition. Economic growth benefits a small minority while marginalizing millions. Adiga exposes how democracy and capitalism fail to deliver social justice, thereby questioning dominant development paradigms.

Comparative Analysis: Convergences and Divergences

A comparative reading of these novels reveals significant thematic convergences. All three authors critique the myth of inclusive progress and highlight the persistence of inequality. Their narratives expose how modern institutions reinforce existing hierarchies rather than dismantling them. Globalization, urbanization, and education emerge as double-edged forces that offer opportunities to some while marginalizing others.

At the same time, each writer adopts a distinct perspective. Desai emphasizes emotional displacement and cultural hybridity, portraying marginalization as a condition of existential uncertainty. Roy foregrounds caste and gender oppression, presenting subalternity as structurally embedded and violently enforced. Adiga focuses on economic exploitation and class conflict, depicting subaltern resistance in aggressive and pragmatic terms.

Narrative strategies also differ significantly. Desai employs lyrical prose and multiple perspectives to convey fragmentation. Roy uses experimental structure and symbolic imagery to challenge linear history. Adiga adopts a satirical and confessional voice to provoke readers. These stylistic choices shape how subaltern experiences are represented and interpreted.

In terms of agency, Desai’s characters remain largely constrained, Roy’s characters resist but are defeated, and Adiga’s protagonist succeeds through transgression. This variation reflects different ideological positions regarding the possibility of social change. Together, these narratives suggest that subaltern agency is contingent, fragile, and often compromised.

Conclusion

The works of Kiran Desai, Arundhati Roy, and Aravind Adiga provide insightful critiques of modernity and its impact on marginalized communities in postcolonial India. Through diverse narrative techniques and thematic concerns, these authors expose the contradictions of development and globalization. Their novels reveal how modernity, instead of ensuring social mobility and equality, often reproduces structures of exclusion.

By foregrounding subaltern experiences, these writers challenge dominant representations of Indian progress. They emphasize lived realities of poverty, discrimination, and displacement that remain invisible in official discourse. At the same time, their narratives explore possibilities of resistance, whether through emotional resilience, political dissent, or radical self-assertion.

This study demonstrates that contemporary Indian English fiction functions as a vital space for negotiating questions of power, identity, and justice. Desai, Roy, and Adiga not only document social realities but also reshape literary conventions to accommodate marginalized voices. Their works invite readers to reconsider prevailing notions of success and development and to imagine more inclusive forms of modernity.

In an era marked by rapid economic change and persistent inequality, these novels remain profoundly relevant. They remind us that true progress cannot be measured solely by material growth but must be evaluated in terms of human dignity, social equity, and ethical responsibility.

Works Cited

Adiga, Aravind. The White Tiger. HarperCollins, 2008.

Ashcroft, Bill, Gareth Griffiths, and Helen Tiffin. The Empire Writes Back: Theory and Practice in Post-Colonial Literatures. 2nd ed., Routledge, 2002.

Bhabha, Homi K. The Location of Culture. Routledge, 1994.

Chatterjee, Partha. The Nation and Its Fragments: Colonial and Postcolonial Histories. Princeton UP, 1993.

Desai, Kiran. The Inheritance of Loss. Hamish Hamilton, 2006.

Guha, Ranajit. Dominance without Hegemony: History and Power in Colonial India. Harvard UP, 1997.

Nayar, Pramod K. Postcolonial Literature: An Introduction. Pearson, 2008.

Roy, Arundhati. The God of Small Things. IndiaInk, 1997.

Spivak, Gayatri Chakravorty. “Can the Subaltern Speak?” Marxism and the Interpretation of Culture, edited by Cary Nelson and Lawrence Grossberg, U of Illinois P, 1988, pp. 271–313.

Thiong’o, Ngũgĩ wa. Decolonising the Mind: The Politics of Language in African Literature. Heinemann, 1986.

Young, Robert J. C. Postcolonialism: An Historical Introduction. Blackwell, 2001.